T
twoangels
Guest
The medical community does not like Natural Family Planning/Fertility Awareness Methods because early user effective studies indicated that couples were more likely than contracepting couples to not use the method consistantly. In other words, the couple charts, knows they’re fertile and has sex anyway. However, NFP couples (especially in the intitial studies) tend to have a more casual attitude toward getting pregnant than contracepting couples. In fact, within Catholic circles and on this site, you’ll find lots of debate over the “moral use” of NFP. People get into huge arguments about what justifies even making an effort to prevent pregnancy.well actually wait, my mom just said, and she is catholic, she said the NFP method works badly and she just used birth control, I am thinking about just having my wife on birth control despite it being unnatural, I mean I am not going against the church, I would never want to do that but its just unneccesarily tedious and chancey for the NFP method, I dont want like 8 kids like my grandmother had.
This argument has died down a little and modern studies have started to incorporate more secular individuals who use charting plus barrier methods instead of abstinence. The couples who abstain do have a lower pregnancy rate than the couples who use the barrier methods during the fertile times, but the difference is not significant and overall the user effective is about a 3% failure rate and a 1% method failure rate (though it varies slightly depending on the study.
You also have the practical experience of couples who gave NFP a shot, but learned fertility charting while they were already sexually active or even while they needed special instructions, like with breastfeeding. And so there is a definite learning curve to fertiity charting that isn’t really suited for the idea of learning the method while being sexually active. Personally I believe the charting should be taught to girls as soon as they hit their periods because the chart is also a great health record and can be used to catch women’s health issues right away.
Then you have women with irregular cycles. Left untreated, these cycles not only make charting a bigger challenge, but they also are a health issue. There is something wrong with the woman’s hormonal balance and she does need medical treatment. And such treatment ought to make NFP easier. (the only issue being that finding physicians trained in such treatment can be a huge challenge. If the woman does not have access to a physician who can diagnosis the real condition and treat it, than I believe the long term health risk of an irregular cycle warrent going on hormonal birth control because it at least regulates it to a point.
With all that said, I have noticed that the medical community now isn’t even starting to condemn NFP. They’re starting to discredit barier methods and even the pill. The push is to get most women on the IUD because since it is inserted and thus involves no steps, the user failure rate gets super close to the method failure rate unlike any methods that involve personal choice.
There is definitely a world out that that sees unplanned pregnancies as an evil. Most doctors will freak out when a woman refuses hormonal birth control. I don’t believe we can blame women for being on it. There is an agenda to get us on it.
But, no, NFP does not mean having more kids than you can handle. It does mean that you have to weigh your desire to prevent pregnancy with your need for sexual intimacy. Is it worth it or is there a bit of selfishness there?