D
Digitonomy
Guest
If there is a sitting bishop, he has the power to influence and sanction those within the diocese involved in the selection of a replacement. You seem to be more familiar than I am with the committees and so forth involved in the whole process, which determines where there could be undue pressure applied.I really don’t understand why a retirement normally would have to be accepted to begin the process of finding a new bishop…why not just hold off on leaving a see vacant until the Vatican is prepared to name a successor?
Besides the bishop actively applying inappropriate pressure in the selection process, all involved may behave differently if it is not known for sure that his resignation will be accepted.
Here is the issue I had heard about for the Bishop of Birmingham - notice the two announcements that the resignation had been accepted. I couldn’t find the details in a quick search… I think the issue was that it wasn’t actually published, as the Vatican’s publishing house suspends all activity upon the pope’s death - wouldn’t want rogue elements in the Vatican publishing papal edicts after all. As a result, even though it was accepted by John Paul, it did not take effect.
catechism.org/comm/archives/2005/05-088.shtml
nccbuscc.org/comm/archives/2005/05-116.shtml