blessing instead of communion

  • Thread starter Thread starter angell1
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The OP mentioned the document. I provided it. The OP can read it for clarification on this topic. Why is this such a problem for you.
There are plenty of places on this board, other threads and sticky on this forum that has the information needed regarding the document. Why is it such a problem for you to accept another perspective concerning the topic of this thread?
 
There are plenty of places on this board, other threads and sticky on this forum that has the information needed regarding the document. Why is it such a problem for you to accept another perspective concerning the topic of this thread?
It is normal in these forums when Church documents are brought up that someone provides them for reference.
You are the one who has problem with that. You brought it up, not me.
 
This issue is raised frequently on this forum. There is also a sticky which makes clear that the oft-quoted CDW message from 2009 was a personal opinion that carries no authority. Bottom line is that Bishops decide in their ecclesial areas whether blessings at Communion are permitted or encouraged. Incidently they are permitted in Vatican City!
What everyone who likes these blessings seem to miss is that the letter from the CDW simply provided norms that are already in effect that prohibit these blessings.

It reminds me of the way everyone quotes Redemptionis Sacramentum for everything when all RS did was remind priests of all the things that are already forbidden. There may have been one or two new things in RS but for the most part it simply reiterated what was already in canon law and various other documents.
 
It is normal in these forums when Church documents are brought up that someone provides them for reference.
You are the one who has problem with that. You brought it up, not me.
Yes, it is normal for people to post Church documents and it is normal for people to offer their opinions. To answer your question, I don’t have a problem with posting church documents. It is just that I am trying to be considerate of the OP"s situation. And in my opinion, the best response in this case is not to overwhelm a person with documentation. .
 
👍

Reminds me of the cartoon
Yea, that cartoon says it all.

There is another thread discussing the same topic. It is ridiculous that people come in with their “authority” telling others they “should not do this”. Like you said, Popes bless children all the time.

Even if the “Communion line” is for Communion, there is no need to be so opinionated and insisting. I see some people hold the attitude of “I am right, you are wrong” and “knowing it all”. Such mentality usually belongs to the beginners on the spiritual journey.
 
Non-Catholics and Catholics in a state of mortal sin or otherwise not properly disposed to receive may not receive Communion and should not be going up for a blessing. It is called the Communion Line and not the Communion and Blessing Line.
Blessing are not permitted. Everyone receives a blessing just before the Mass ends so there is no need to go up anyway.

February 2009

Vol. XIV, No. 10

Congregation for Divine Worship -

On Giving Blessings During the Communion Rite

What about giving blessings to people who come forward in the Communion line but who are not receiving Communion? Should a priest, deacon or an extraordinary minister of Holy Communion give the person a blessing instead?

What if a person who is not receiving Communion presents himself with arms crossed over the chest, during the regular administration of Communion?

Two men wrote to the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments (CDW) asking about this practice. Their query asked if there are “particular guidelines or restrictions” concerning the practice of a minister or extraordinary minister giving the person a blessing.

The response from the CDW was in the form of a letter (Protocol No. 930/08/L), dated November 22, 2008, signed by Father Anthony Ward, SM, Under-secretary of the Congregation.

The letter said that “this matter is presently under the attentive study of the Congregation”, so “for the present, this dicastery wishes to limit itself to the following observations”:
  1. The liturgical blessing of the Holy Mass is properly given to each and to all at the conclusion of the Mass, just a few moments subsequent to the distribution of Holy Communion.
  2. Lay people, within the context of Holy Mass, are unable to confer blessings. These blessings, rather, are the competence of the priest (cf. Ecclesia de Mysterio, Notitiae 34 (15 Aug. 1997), art. 6, § 2; Canon 1169, § 2; and Roman Ritual De Benedictionibus (1985), n. 18).
  3. Furthermore, the laying on of a hand or hands — which has its own sacramental significance, inappropriate here — by those distributing Holy Communion, in substitution for its reception, is to be explicitly discouraged.
  4. The Apostolic Exhortation Familiaris Consortio n. 84, “forbids any pastor, for whatever reason to pretext even of a pastoral nature, to perform ceremonies of any kind for divorced people who remarry”. To be feared is that any form of blessing in substitution for communion would give the impression that the divorced and remarried have been returned, in some sense, to the status of Catholics in good standing.
  5. In a similar way, for others who are not to be admitted to Holy Communion in accord with the norm of law, the Church’s discipline has already made clear that they should not approach Holy Communion nor receive a blessing. This would include non-Catholics and those envisaged in can. 915 (i.e., those under the penalty of excommunication or interdict, and others who obstinately persist in manifest grave sin).
The Congregation’s clarification that extraordinary ministers of Holy Communion (always laity), cannot give sacramental blessings within Mass is very helpful; and could be especially useful to pastors in parishes where inappropriate blessings during Communion have become common.
I doubt that either Jesus or the Holy Father would agree with your assessment.
 
Yes, an Extraordinary Minister can give a blessing at Communion, but we are specifically told to use the SIDE of the thumb (so that no particle of the Holy Eucharist may touch the forehead), make the sign of the cross on the forehead of those not receiving Communion but coming for a blessing. We are NOT to make the sign of the cross with our whole hand (as a Priest does at Mass) nor to make it while holding a Host in our hand. Those types of blessings are reserved for the Priest alone. Anyone can give a blessing with their thumb on the forehead of their child, spouse or others in the family. Superiors in Convents have been doing so for centuries when Sisters are leaving to drive to the store (or travel by foot or donkey, for that matter!) Many families do so when their children leave for school. My husband gave me such a blessing each day when I left for the evening/night shifts with a long drive and then working as a Nurse. It was a great comfort to me. I’m sure it’s a comfort to anyone! Our Priest instructed us very carefully about how to do this, and what is and is not permitted.
This is the sort of thing that makes me shake my head. I don’t think there is anything wrong with how laypeople impart blessings at your parish. What I do think is ridiculous is how it is to be differentiated from the “priestly method”, even though they are so very similar. It almost seems like the rule exists simply to make one method exclusive to clergy, and nothing else.

I know some “experts” claim that laypeople cannot confer a blessing in the name of the Holy Trinity. That too seems arbitrary to me.

What is wonderful is that your priest gives careful instruction. Most EMsHC have no clue whatsoever at my parish about any of this at my parish and simply make something up (all different of course) on the fly.
 
This thread has been dormant for three and a half years…beyond the expiry for reviving a thread, according to forum practice.

It is reported to the moderator of the sub-forum, so that it can be closed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top