M
mo0004
Guest
A company has a policy that it will grant a “retention incentive” of up to 10% of salary to employees who would otherwise look for and accept another job. An employee goes to his boss and, in accord with policy, says in writing “I want a $10,000 a year raise. (About 10% of salary.) Unless I get it, I will look for another job and leave if I find one. But if I get the raise, I’ll stay.” The employee is bluffing. He knows that it is very unlikely that he will look for another job even if he doesn’t get the raise. But the employee is a valued, experienced professional in a hard-to-fill occupation, and the boss knows it. It will cost a lot more to train a replacement than to simply give in to the $10K raise request. And this even assumes that such a replacement can even be found because there is an acute shortage of qualified people in this profession The employee deserves to be paid more (this is backed up by published salary statistics), and the company can afford it. The employee, if kept happy, is likely to stay another 10 years before retirement, so the employee stands to gain over $100,000 by his bluff. The boss is pretty sure that the employee is bluffing, but feels that the employee is worth it. The boss recommends the employee for the raise, the company gives it and the employee accepts it. Four questions: Is the bluff a sin on the part of the employee? If so, could it be mortal? If the boss knows that the employee is bluffing but just wants to keep a valued employee, is the boss committing a sin by recommending approval of the raise? If so, is that sin mortal?