BombShell: William Barr says there is no evidence of widespread fraud in presidential election

  • Thread starter Thread starter RootKitWarrior
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Also for everyone else who claims fraud with the only proof being “I read it on a website.”
 
" Attorney General William Barr said in an interview Tuesday that the Justice Department has uncovered no evidence of widespread voter fraud that would tip the results of the presidential election, a comment directly undercutting allegations being made by President Donald Trump and his legal team.

“To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have affected a different outcome in the election,” Barr told the Associated Press."
puer.dei said:
Well, tonight’s tweetstorm should be epic.
Click to expand...
"The comments are likely to infuriate President Trump and members of his legal team, who have increasingly turned their ire towards the Justice Department and FBI in recent days over the agencies’ refusal to investigate baseless conspiracies of widespread voter fraud.

“You would think, if you’re in the FBI or Department of Justice, this is – this is the biggest thing you could be looking at,” Trump said in a Sunday interview with Fox News host Maria Bartiromo. “Where are they? I have not seen anything. I mean, I just – they just keep moving along, and they go on to the next president.”

Barr specifically singled out one theory peddled by Trump and his allies that vote tabulation machines had been tampered with in a way to skew the election towards President-elect Joe Biden.

“There’s been one assertion that would be systemic fraud and that would be the claim that machines were programmed essentially to skew the election results. And the DHS and DOJ have looked into that, and so far, we haven’t seen anything to substantiate that,” Barr said."

 
Last edited:
Should I offer a conspiracy theory? Ok you twisted my arms.

Barr is pandering to Biden in hopes of keeping his J O B in the D O J.
 
I have pointed out that is the way it is going to be months ago.

The fraud although easy to deduce, is almost impossible to prove once the votes are in.

You need to manage that BEFORE the election with voter ID, up to date voter registration lists, minimizing mail-in votes and tracking them BEFORE counting them, etc.

I agree with Barr. No “proof” at least court-room worthy. It was set up that way from the beginning.

They KNEW Trump would break vote-getting records for a presidential candidate. And with President Trump receiving the most Presidentual votes in the history of the USA (unless you want to count Biden’s fraudulent vote count - my opinion) Trump did break vote obtaining records.
 
Last edited:
Cathoholic said:
Trump receiving the most Presidentual votes in the history of the USA (unless you want to count Biden’s fraudulent vote count - my opinion) Trump did break vote obtaining records.
Click to expand...
So how many millions of Biden’s votes are fraudulent in your esteemed opinion?
 
RootKitWarrior said:
Barr is pandering to Biden in hopes of keeping his J O B in the D O J.
Click to expand...
Not a chance. I have never heard of a cabinet member being retained when a new administration takes office.

Certainly one that has betrayed the tradition of an independent justice department will not be welcome in a new administration.

I think it’s more likely he is trying to do damage control and burnish his image by putting some space between himself and the president. Maybe even bait Trump into firing him. So many well respected professionals in the Justice Department and elsewhere in government have been fired by this president that it’s almost a badge of honor, a proof of virtue.
 
Last edited:
Digitnomy said:
I think it’s more likely he is trying to do damage control and burnish his image by putting some space between himself and the president.
Click to expand...
You might be right, but I think it’s too late for Barr. That Trump stench is hard to get rid of.

 
Cathoholic said:
I have pointed out that is the way it is going to be months ago.

The fraud although easy to deduce, is almost impossible to prove once the votes are in.

You need to manage that BEFORE the election with voter ID, up to date voter registration lists, minimizing mail-in votes and tracking them BEFORE counting them, etc.

I agree with Barr. No “proof” at least court-room worthy. It was set up that way from the beginning.
Click to expand...
The absence of evidence is not evidence.
 
Cathoholic said:
48.png
FrankFletcher:
The absence of evidence is not evidence.
Click to expand...
I agree with your principle, but I disagree with your built-in premise concerning the widespread election fraud that took place.
Click to expand...
What built-in premise do you believe I am using?
 
Cathoholic said:
They KNEW Trump would break vote-getting records for a presidential candidate. And with President Trump receiving the most Presidentual votes in the history of the USA (unless you want to count Biden’s fraudulent vote count - my opinion) Trump did break vote obtaining records.
Click to expand...
The election is not a popularity contest.
 
As said at the USPS whistleblowers’ press conference, that whole event was after what Barr said, this is already old news in post #1. More is coming out.
 
I guess the DOJ issued a reply yesterday saying some media outlets have incorrectly reported that the DOJ has concluded its investigation into voter fraud and that it has not found any voter fraud in the election. The Department will continue to pursue voter fraud allegations.

The full message can be seen here ~

https://twitter.com/x/status/1333937356185997312
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top