Book of Revelation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jim_Baur
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

Jim_Baur

Guest
How many sacraments are mentioned in the Book of Revelation?

Or, how many allusions to the seven sacraments in the Book of Revelation?

Thanks.
 
Hi Jim

I think you would be hard put to find any allusions to the sacraments in the Book of Revelation. Why do you ask?

Verbum
 
Wedding feast = Eucharist,Matrimony
Lambs Blood washing Robes=Confession
White robes=Baptism
Sealed with Sign(Spirit)=Confirmation
Offering of Incense,Prayers=Holy Orders

Anointing of sick= Stuck on this one.
 
The Heavenly Liturgy is seen in the Book of Revelation.

Also, I am studying “The Bible and The Liturgy” by Jean Danielou, S. J. On page 61 of the English translation he says: “So if we recall the fact that the Apocalypse is filled with allusions to Baptism, it certainly seems as if this sign of the Lamb refers to the “sphragis” of the liturgy of initiation.”

The question came to mind: How many allusions to the seven sacraments are in the Book of Revelation?

I have read several books that agree with Scott Hahn’s “The Lamb’s Supper the Mass as Heaven on Earth.”

My gut belief is that all seven are in the Apocalypse. I do not know if I am correct or incorrect.

Sorry if I am not clear, I find it most difficult to articulate my ideas and questions in writing.
 
Jim,

I will reply to this later, I am at work right now and I don’t have the time I need.

As for a quick reply, you have penance in 2:5. You also have the Lord in 2 places making refernce to the Eucharist. 2:7 is a Eucahristic reference concerning eating from the tree of life. Also 3:20 *Behold, I stand at the gate, and knock. If any man shall hear my voice, and open to me the door, I will come in to him, and will **sup *with him, and he with me. And 2:17 He, that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith to the churches: To him that overcometh, I will give the hidden manna, and will give him a white counter, and in the counter, a new name written, which no man knoweth, but he that receiveth it.
This is backed up by the Church Fathers too, they understood those passages to be sacramental passages, which I will give the quotes from them tonight.

I would also recommend using your Cathecism to find the Sacrament-Revelation connection. All you have to do is turn to the section on the 7 Sacraments and look at the bottom of the page to see where the book of Revelation is quoted.
 
As I look at my Catechism, I find some connections made between Revelation and Sacraments.

Confirmation- Rev. 7:2-3 and 9:4 7:3 Saying: Hurt not the earth, nor the sea, nor the trees, till we sign the servants of our God in their foreheads.

Holy Orders
- Rev. 1:6, 5:9-10 5:10 And hast made us to our God a kingdom and priests, and we shall reign on the earth.

Matrimony-
Rev. 19:7,9 7 Let us be glad and rejoice, and give glory to him; for the marriage of the Lamb is come, and his wife hath prepared herself.9 And he said to me: Write: Blessed are they that are called to the marriage supper of the Lamb. And he saith to me:
 
Here are some portions from my commentary that I am working on.

2:17 He, that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith to the churches: To him that overcometh, I will give the hidden manna, and will give him a white counter, and in the counter, a new name written, which no man knoweth, but he that receiveth it.

The hidden manna could have been understood by Oecumenius as the Holy Eucharist, as he used the Greek word tou musteriou which is “of the mystery.” That is where we get the Latin word “sacramentum” which is in English translated as “sacrament,” which the Eucharist is a sacrament: The *manna *of the mystery, in other words he said, “I shall grant them to be filled with the spiritual blessings.” The white stone is one which has won the victory and is bright with glory; and one a stone a new name, which no one knows except the one who receives it; for it said, “What eye has not seen, nor ear heard, nor what has entered the human heart- all that God has prepared for those who love him.(1Cor. 2:9)” . Oecumenius Commentary of Revelation] 6th Century

Tyconius clearly identifies the hidden manna as the Eucharist: This manna is the invisible Bread which came down from Heaven, which indeed was made man, so that ‘man might eat the bread of angels.(Ps. 78:25)’ And the figure of this was indicated beforehand in the manna given in the desert. Whoever ate of that bread were said by the Lord to have died, because remaining faithless, they did not eat of this hidden and uniquely spiritual manna by which Christ offers immortality to the faithful. For he said, “Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink His blood you will not have eternal life in you.(John 6:53)” For, indeed, whoever at that time was able to eat spiritually, they were worthy to obtain the same immortality, as were Moses and others. As the apostle reaches, “They are the same spiritual food.(1Cor. 10:3)” For the visible manna was in no way detrimental to those who used the bodily food in a spiritual manner. So also now, the spiritual manna of the Lord’s body does not profit persons in the present if they receive it unworthily, for “they eat and drink judgment upon themselves.(1Cor. 11:29)” Tyconius Commentary on Revelation] 330-390AD

St. Andrew also understand the hidden manna to be the Eucharist: The hidden manna is the “Bread of Life” which came down from Heaven for us and became edible. Figuratively, those good things are also called manna which are in the future going to come down from Heaven, from where comes also the New Jerusalem. Those who conquer the Devil shall obtain these things. St. Andrew of Caesarea Commentary on Revelation] 6th Century
 
3:20 Behold, I stand at the gate, and knock. If any man shall hear my voice, and open to me the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me.

Oecumenius seems to indicate that the supper is reference to the Eucharist by saying it is a participation in the holy mysteries: The Lord is showing His own meekness and peacefulness. Even now the Lord says to the bride in the Song of Songs, “Open to me, my sister, my bride.(Song 5:2)” And if anyone will open to him, he will enter. Otherwise, He will pass by. The supper with the Lord signifies participation in the holy mysteries. Oecumenius Commentary on Revelation] 6th Century

Newman connects the supper to the Eucharist: He says: “If any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with Me.” [Rev. iii. 20.] This allusion to a feast is conveyed in still more sacred and wonderful language in the following passage, to which I have already referred: *“I am the Living Bread which came down from heaven; if any man eat of this Bread, he shall live for ever, and the Bread that I will give is My flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.” … “He that eateth My flesh and drinketh My blood, dwelleth in Me and I in him.” Again: “We are members of His body, from His flesh and from His bones.” *[John vi. 51, 56. Eph. v. 30. [John Henry Cardinal Newman Lecture 6. The Gift of Righteousness] 1801-1890AD
 
2:7 He, that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith to the churches: To him, that overcometh, I will give to eat of the tree of life, which is in the paradise of my God.

Tyconius brings out a Eucharistic interpretation:Who conquers, I will grant to eat from the tree of life,” that is, from the fruit of the cross, “which is in the paradise of my God.” The Church is to be regarded as paradise, for “all things were done in figure,” and Adam was, “ the shadow of the one to come,” as the Apostle teaches.(Rom. 5:14) Indeed, the tree of life is the wisdom of God, the Lord Jesus Christ, who hung on the cross. In the Church and in the spiritual paradise, He gives to the faithful food of life and the Sacrament of the celestial bread, of which you read, “Wisdom is the tree of life to those who embrace her.(Prov. 3:18)” Tyconius Commentary on Revelation] 340-390AD
 
Hey Jim, try this on for size:

Jesus has seven eyes and seven horns. I think eyes can be seen as “seeing” the truth, of which Christ is obviously all-knowing, even by His own words, the Truth itself. Well, I have also heard that horns many times denote power, and Christ’s power is in the Redemption, of which the “Seven” Sacraments are the primary source of grace. Interestingly enough, the False Prophet has “two horns, like a Lamb”, and JPII taught that the devil is not creative, but that he “plaigarizes the Sacraments”. So the False Prophet could be “plaigarizing” the Sacraments.

Note, when Christ’s body is divided through ruptures to unity, especially as concerns an attack on the Eucharist, the Sacrament of Sacraments, there is an associated rift of the Sacramental life, in that the heretics who attack this way lose five of the seven sacraments (those requiring a priest), retaining only two, Baptism and Marriage

Well, to make a long story short, I conjecture that two can then become a symbol of heresy, so that the false prophet in having “two” horns, is like the ultimate “heresy”, diabolically twisting the two Sacraments of Baptism and Marriage into their diabolical counterparts:
Now, the false prophet could not literally have two sacraments, for in its symbolism of apostate ideologies that deceive man, he is completely devoid of any spiritual goodness, but JPII, who, on one occasion, spoke of the FP as, on one level, materialism, speaks of the devil as plagairizing the sacraments, such as how the devil plagairizes Marriage and the Eucharist with fornication and gluttony/drunkenness. So I suggest something similar: for just as Christ’s full Redemptive power through sanctifying grace finds its greatest expression in the “seven” sacraments, so, the false prophet, as the ultimate heresy “2 horns”], speaks of a deceptive “salvation” and fulfillment in a total mockery and diabolical twisting of the “2” sacraments of heresy, Baptism and Marriage.

Now, note, Baptism and Marriage most aptly express the two great relationships that we have to God as Christians: we are the children of the Father, and we are [collectively] the spouse of Christ. Note also that Baptism establishes this spiritual “childhood” in the sense of total dependence upon a loving God who must help us, teach us, guide us, etc. Also, in Baptism, we receive already of the fruits of the Spirits and an initial infusion of the virtues and fruits of holiness, all of which are intended to nourish us to do what the meaning of our existence is: to offer ourselves totally to others and God in love and self-giving and sacrificing. This most adequately also expresses the meaning and purpose of marriage, which ultimately points toward unity with God, a deep and unfathomable immersion in ultimate, infinite self-giving love and truth.

Hence, the FP, as apostate worldliness, sin, and materialism, twists these realities diabolically into their evil counterparts. Hence, just as Baptism inaugurates one on the journey of salvation and makes one a child of God, being totally dependent on his Love, Help and Truth, so the counterfeit of Baptism makes one a child of the devil, bearing the imprint of the opposite of love and dependence: selfish ambition and immoral passions and the ultimate INdepedence, that is, like the devil, the total negation of one’s dependence upon God, believing oneself to be “one’s own god,” in ultimate pride, “knowing good and evil”, independent not only of Christ, His Church, His Scripture, but even of ANY religion, and believing that, just as Baptism points us to the only thing that can ultimately fulfill us [God], that the material creation alone will suffice, that it will sustain us and satisfy us.

Also, for whereas Christian Marriage ultimately speaks of self-less sacrificial, totally-self-giving love, calling one to be in union not merely in some physical sense, but, ultimately, spiritually with the other, so the FP’s counterfeit of marriage is cheap, lustful, superfiicial fornication with the world, believing that one can ultimately be fulfilled by the selfish and vain aspirations of prideful worldly and superficial pursuits, seeking to “get” and “take” pleasures and recognitions for oneself, instead of giving and offering oneself in love.

we might also then draw the contrast between the “woman” and the “whore”, that is, between Christ’s Spouse, the woman of Revelation 12, the Chuch, and the “Whore of Babylon”, the unfaithful fornicater who joins herself to the “world”, that is, the enemy of Christ.
…continued
 
…continued:

There is also the interesting way in which the “five loaves and two fish” of the Gospel accounts of the prefiguring of the Eucharist become an appropriate support for this theology:
The discourse on the miraculous feeding of the multitudes with five loaves and two fish is highly connected with the Eucharist, and the Eucharist is the Sacrament of Sacraments, the ultimate sign of the unity Christ willed for his disciples. Is it not then possible that these same five loaves and two fish deal with an intrinsic mystery associated with the disunity of Chrisitans?
I can send you my links if you’d like further elaboration.

Blessings!
scott
 
How many sacraments are mentioned in the Book of Revelation?

Or, how many allusions to the seven sacraments in the Book of Revelation?

Thanks.

Next to none.​

There are plenty of things in it - but it has nothing to say about the sacraments. Unless baptism is here, but I’m relying on memory. I can’t see any others 🙂

There is the marriage-feast of the Lamb, of course - but that is not a reference to a sacrament, except in the loose sense in which talking about a soldier’s “baptism of fire” is a reference to the sacrament of baptism. The use of the word is not of itself a reference to the thing; “a storm in a tea-cup”, despite the presence of the word “storm”, does not denote to anything in meteorology, but denotes a fuss about a mere nothing by using the words “storm” & “tea-cup”.

What a word denotes, is not always what the word itself names - language is too allusive, & used in too many ways, for naming and denotation always to match. Names & denotations may always match in computing - but not in speech or literature.

So when John talks about a great red dragon with ten heads & seven horns, the words name a mythological monster, but the thing denoted, persecution, is something far from mythological. That doesn’t mean John was spaced out or telling fibs - it is our problem if we think such things, not his fault. That use of language was familiar then - it just happens to be unfamiliar now.

ISTM that people so often try to find in book X or Y what book X or Y does not mention, that they miss what books X & Y do have to say. Which is a great pity. ##
 
so your signature means, all the glory is “God’s”, that is, the liberal god, who dismisses any significant spiritual meaning to Scripture, and woiuld have us beleive that the apoc is NOTHING MORE than resistance literature, just a set of obscure temporal facts about the early Church’s struggles, couched in symbolism, but that, in the end, says nothing about the great spiritual meaning of human history, much less about anything beyond the earliest days of Church?

yeah whatever. :rolleyes:

Because, differences in religion are very much neglible. Muslim, Catholic, Prot, Jewish, Hindu? It doesn’t really matter that much. all that matters is just mushy platitudes about “love and peace” and “sharing and caring”, a very vague fully allegorical sense of “niceness”.

:rolleyes:
 
I wish to apologize for the above lack of charity, but I become frustrated with individuals who wish to water down Scripture to the point that is loses its significance.
 
Jim, it seems to me that the Church along with all 7 Sacraments are in the Book of Revelation. After reading Scott’s “Lamb’s Supper the Mass…”, I can see the Mass with it’s liturgy as well. The thing that really galddens my heart is the flowing “Water with Trees and their leaves for healing”! It is a joy just to see a little of the Glory of the Work of God!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top