BREAKING: Archbishop of Canterbury to Resign

  • Thread starter Thread starter JugglingReferee
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I realize you’re Orthodox and I confess I know less about your faith that I do some others. So perhaps everything is swell in yours. But I’m uncertain everything is swell in some other faith communities either. Even the Catholic Church, purported to be Christ’s one and only true Church on earth by Catholics has had Her share of problems surface over time. But beyond your criticism, I think it was the use of the word “scavengers”, by which it at least appeared to me you were referring to some Episcopalians, which I found somewhat objectionable. I know this has not been the case across the board but in correspondence with Episcopal clergy in my area there has been little dissension and no exodus of churches from what I’ve been told. And these folks while of a diffferent one than yours to be sure, are people of faith. Striving to live out their faith to the best of their ability. In any case God bless you as well along your faith journey and peace.
I’m not sure how you got that I was calling “Episcopalians” scavengers. I said just the opposite. The next leader of the Anglican Communion is going to have to hold off scavengers, i.e. non-Anglicans.
It was stated only to go along with the sinking ship metaphor.

I would also like to clarify I made no criticism. I only said their next leader needs to be strong.

Context is key.
 
I’m not sure how you got that I was calling “Episcopalians” scavengers. I said just the opposite. The next leader of the Anglican Communion is going to have to hold off scavengers, i.e. non-Anglicans.
Ok perhaps I misunderstand and if so I apologze. So who then are these non-Anglican/non Episcopalian “scavengers” that you refer too who the next leader will have too hold off, if they arent even Anglican/Episcopal members?
 
I absolutely agree. The Anglican Communion is in need of help. I believe that if it is to come, it will come from Africa.
I really hope so, but I doubt it. My own opinion is that Africans and Asians may more likely split or become semi-autonomous and in a few more years or a decade/two- completely split eventually. I don’t see the radical liberal movement dying or taming any time soon, nor even willing to maintain the status quo for the sake of unity.

More and more liberals are joining that communion, running from Catholicism and other Protestant Churches where the dream of the sixties and seventies liberation movements appears to have failed and on a retreat. These elements are more likely to push that communion to a split by their aggressive modernism than anything else.

Moreover, the conservatives and more Orthodox Anglicans are leaving in droves to join smaller and more traditional Anglican groups or the Orthodox and Catholic Churches. This ensures that the radical liberal elements will have total control of the Anglican Church in the Western World even faster and push a split with other more conservative communions in other areas sooner rather than later.

But that’s just my opinion. 🤷
 
I weep bitterly for the Anglican communion. Once great and proud, now but a shadow of its former self. How the mighty have fallen!
 
. . . .More and more liberals are joining that communion, running from Catholicism and other Protestant Churches where the dream of the sixties and seventies liberation movements appears to have failed and on a retreat. These elements are more likely to push that communion to a split by their aggressive modernism than anything else.

Moreover, the conservatives and more Orthodox Anglicans are leaving in droves to join smaller and more traditional Anglican groups or the Orthodox and Catholic Churches. This ensures that the radical liberal elements will have total control of the Anglican Church in the Western World even faster and push a split with other more conservative communions in other areas sooner rather than later. . . .
Marybeloved,
I said something similar in a previous post. Conservatives are leaving, and liberals from many other faiths, along with many otherwise unchurched, are coming into TEC.

There are conservative Episcopalians who are still in the Communion fighting for orthodoxy. Though I fear it is a losing battle.

Peace,
Anna
 
Marybeloved,
I said something similar in a previous post. Conservatives are leaving, and liberals from many other faiths, along with many otherwise unchurched, are coming into TEC.

There are conservative Episcopalians who are still in the Communion fighting for orthodoxy. Though I fear it is a losing battle.

Peace,
Anna
I fear you are correct.

GKC
 
Nevermind Nine Two unless I’m still mistaken as to who you believe the “scavengers” are. As I’m gathering from other posts they are the liberal Christians who become members of the Episcopal Church. So in other words they are indeed for instance the Episcopalians in the Episcopal diocese in my area where I’ve been told there has been little dissension and no exodus of churches has ocurred. Where in the case of at least one of the parishes in my locale, I’ve been told they are an open community and follow and espouse all of the actions taken by TECUSA. So I think I get it now. Scavengers = Christians of a more liberal persuasion. So indeed if that’s along the lines of your description, I find that objectionable. God’s blessings to all along each of our faith walks. May all who in faith profess Him Lord and Savior and all His created people journey in peace.
 
I’m not sure how much of that can be laid at his door. What was he supposed to do? He’s no Pope, you know.
The Church of England dropped the ball as far back, arguably, as the 1970s – by virtue of the fact that they did not break off communion with churches that started ordaining women to the priesthood.

Nevertheless, having a liberal like Williams as Archbishop of Cantebury certainly didn’t help either the Church of England or the larger Anglican Communion.
 
Unless I’m really missing something, Nine_Two’s “scavengers” metaphor seems pretty straight-forward. See, for example, Greener on the other side.
No maybe it’s me missing something as to the word “scavenger”. In my mind it has a connotation related to filth and decay. So I thought all of you critical of liberal Christians were suggesting they are filthy and in decay. But a scavenger goes about searching for and collecting refuse, filth and decaying matter on whch to feed. So who exactly are they then? I apologize for not understanding who they are. Thanks ahead and Happy Saint Patty’s Day all! My taste buds are anticipating corned beef later! :bounce:
 
The Church of England dropped the ball as far back, arguably, as the 1970s – by virtue of the fact that they did not break off communion with churches that started ordaining women to the priesthood.

Nevertheless, having a liberal like Williams as Archbishop of Cantebury certainly didn’t help either the Church of England or the larger Anglican Communion.
Agreed.

GKC
 
Ok perhaps I misunderstand and if so I apologze. So who then are these non-Anglican/non Episcopalian “scavengers” that you refer too who the next leader will have too hold off, if they arent even Anglican/Episcopal members?
Catholics, Orthodox, other Protestants, Muslims, etc, etc. They are everyone who may benefit as a result of what is happening to the Anglican Church.
Again, it was in keeping with the metaphor, and as not meant as a denouncement of these groups.
 
I really hope so, but I doubt it. My own opinion is that Africans and Asians may more likely split or become semi-autonomous and in a few more years or a decade/two- completely split eventually. I don’t see the radical liberal movement dying or taming any time soon, nor even willing to maintain the status quo for the sake of unity.

More and more liberals are joining that communion, running from Catholicism and other Protestant Churches where the dream of the sixties and seventies liberation movements appears to have failed and on a retreat. These elements are more likely to push that communion to a split by their aggressive modernism than anything else.

Moreover, the conservatives and more Orthodox Anglicans are leaving in droves to join smaller and more traditional Anglican groups or the Orthodox and Catholic Churches. This ensures that the radical liberal elements will have total control of the Anglican Church in the Western World even faster and push a split with other more conservative communions in other areas sooner rather than later.

But that’s just my opinion. 🤷
I think that is what is happening in North America and Europe, but what I see of the Church in other countries is that they jealously guard the old values. My parents visited an Anglican church in the Caribbean a few years ago, and my mother said it reminded her of church when she was a kid.
I notice your location is Africa, so you might well know better than me. But from here it looks like the African provinces (as well as some South American diocese) are engaged in trying to save the Church in North America and Europe from the liberals.
 
Nevermind Nine Two unless I’m still mistaken as to who you believe the “scavengers” are. As I’m gathering from other posts they are the liberal Christians who become members of the Episcopal Church. So in other words they are indeed for instance the Episcopalians in the Episcopal diocese in my area where I’ve been told there has been little dissension and no exodus of churches has ocurred. Where in the case of at least one of the parishes in my locale, I’ve been told they are an open community and follow and espouse all of the actions taken by TECUSA. So I think I get it now. Scavengers = Christians of a more liberal persuasion. So indeed if that’s along the lines of your description, I find that objectionable. God’s blessings to all along each of our faith walks. May all who in faith profess Him Lord and Savior and all His created people journey in peace.
No, The liberals are (to continue the metaphor) the rocks in the ocean. They are the ones who have led the church astray, and have brought on the scavengers. But they aren’t scavengers themselves.

I’m sure you find that even more objectionable (although I could go into metaphor’s you’d find even more objectionable), however political correctness is not an argument in itself. If you have a reasoned argument about why this is wrong, feel free to share.
 
Catholics, Orthodox, other Protestants, Muslims, etc, etc. They are everyone who may benefit as a result of what is happening to the Anglican Church.
Again, it was in keeping with the metaphor, and as not meant as a denouncement of these groups.
Indeed, the “scavengers” in your metaphor can be just about anyone. Although personally (largely because I’m Catholic) I tend to think in terms of Catholicism and Orthodoxy being possible destinations for those fleeing what has been happening in the Anglican Communion. Or as Fr. Robert Hart (whose blog I mentioned ealier) likes to call them “the Two One True Churches”.
Once again this week I was subjected to the oft repeated claim that only two churches have any integrity, validity, catholic standing, and all that. Against the backdrop of current news that highlights the “realignment” within the Anglican Communion-those other Anglicans who don’t always share our convictions-the following was in an e-mail from a long time friend:
“The only two churches that have enough past to be taken seriously in the future do not show the slightest interest in any such realignment.”
This friend long ago became a member of the Orthodox Church, and his sentence is about those exclusive and unique (?) institutions we may call the Two One True Churches.
 
No, The liberals are (to continue the metaphor) the rocks in the ocean. They are the ones who have led the church astray, and have brought on the scavengers. But they aren’t scavengers themselves.

I’m sure you find that even more objectionable (although I could go into metaphor’s you’d find even more objectionable), however political correctness is not an argument in itself. If you have a reasoned argument about why this is wrong, feel free to share.
Ok thanks. I get your “scavenger” metaphor better. Find it more objectionable that you believe liberals have led the church astray? Yup you’re right on that account. I do find it objectionable. I’m heading out for a major portion of the day though. But I’m certain you have heard the arguments. You may not believe though they are reasoned of course. But others of faith do. God bless and peace and a most wonderful day.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top