BREAKING REPORT: Largest Number of Cluster Votes In Wayne Co. MI Came From Psychiatric Hospital For Patients With Severe Mental Illnesses
- Status
A
Allie1
Guest
The author from one of your articles gives this opinion:
“Given that the psychiatric facility in question specifically states that it caters to those with severe mental illness it should be investigated what mental capacity these voters had and whether these ballots were potentially abused. It is my understanding that there is no capacity test for voting in Michigan”
I disagree with that author’s opinion about testing these people’s mental capacity.
As is stated in the article there is no mental capacity test in Michigan.
Moreover, there are some states that do strip the mentally ill of their voting rights.
Michigan is not one of them. It is not a violation of Michigan’s voting laws for the mentally ill to vote.
It is not illegal for these people in these institutions, in this state to vote.
I say let them vote
“Given that the psychiatric facility in question specifically states that it caters to those with severe mental illness it should be investigated what mental capacity these voters had and whether these ballots were potentially abused. It is my understanding that there is no capacity test for voting in Michigan”
I disagree with that author’s opinion about testing these people’s mental capacity.
As is stated in the article there is no mental capacity test in Michigan.
Moreover, there are some states that do strip the mentally ill of their voting rights.
Michigan is not one of them. It is not a violation of Michigan’s voting laws for the mentally ill to vote.
It is not illegal for these people in these institutions, in this state to vote.
I say let them vote
Last edited:
F
F_Marturana
Guest
If the mentally ill can hold office then I think they can also vote.
(I’m not putting down the mentally ill, btw. Mental illness is common. The suffered of mental illness shouldn’t be discriminated against.)
(I’m not putting down the mentally ill, btw. Mental illness is common. The suffered of mental illness shouldn’t be discriminated against.)
Last edited:
F
Feanor2
Guest
Mentally ill and intellectually disabled persons are free to vote in every state I have lived in.
When I was younger I worked with intellectually disabled people and we would drive them to vote on voting day.
When I was younger I worked with intellectually disabled people and we would drive them to vote on voting day.
V
Victoria33
Guest
If that was who voted.
A
Allie1
Guest
This can be asked of all people in all varieties of institutions.
What are your thoughts of people who live in nursing homes?
Do they have a right to vote?
What about homeless shelters?
What about group homes?
Last edited:
V
Victoria33
Guest
If that was who voted for all of those questions.
A
Allie1
Guest
Do you have any reason to believe, that the votes of these people should be disenfranchised.
Z
Zzyzx_Road
Guest
Asking about capacity to vote is asking the wrong question. Further it represents an attempt to dodge the real question.
The real question that should be asked is: what is the possibility that someone else could have voted on their behalf? With the obvious follow on question: were their ballot envelopes audited?
If no hanky panky found, I’m fine with that. But don’t dismiss the possibility out of hand.
The real question that should be asked is: what is the possibility that someone else could have voted on their behalf? With the obvious follow on question: were their ballot envelopes audited?
If no hanky panky found, I’m fine with that. But don’t dismiss the possibility out of hand.
V
Victoria33
Guest
No, I do not believe the Democrats are fair for a number of reasons, Kavanaugh hearing, Coney Barret hearing, some reasons I can not even mention.
A
Allie1
Guest
To dismiss the votes of these people in Michigan who had the right to cast a vote in this election.
You need to come up with a lot better reason than your angst over Kavanaugh and Barrett
Last edited:
P
PaulinVA
Guest
There is nothing here.
We presume that votes were legally cast. Prove that they weren’t.
Don’t say, “Oh, this needs to be investigated”. The presumption is they were legal votes, and there is no proof they weren’t.
This is really getting old.
We presume that votes were legally cast. Prove that they weren’t.
Don’t say, “Oh, this needs to be investigated”. The presumption is they were legal votes, and there is no proof they weren’t.
This is really getting old.
Last edited:
P
PaulinVA
Guest
Basically, this brilliant “data analysis” shows that many voters were found clustered in places where many people live.
I expect next for Sarah Eaglesfield to drop the bombshell that there were many address where only one person lived. This is way below the average and should definitely be looked into.
I expect next for Sarah Eaglesfield to drop the bombshell that there were many address where only one person lived. This is way below the average and should definitely be looked into.
Last edited:
V
Victoria33
Guest
Severe mental illness may be too much of an impairment.
G
gam197
Guest
They did not fill them out before they were even mailed to them by the government, did they.as they did in PA.
Last edited:
P
PaulinVA
Guest
Sigh. Extra sigh.
Is this is a data issue or a something legitimate? Well, we don’t know because there was no understanding of how the data were collected or recorded.
It just adds to the noise and confusion. It means nothing.
T
TepeyacTraveler
Guest
The problem is it’s the same as the 3 year old covered in marker, standing by the wall covered in marker, holding 2 markers, and markers all around the floor.
That child says “Prove it”. This is all the left has. “Prove it”. “Prove it”. “Prove it”.
As the saying goes “Ignorance is Bliss”
But I can’t prove this saying, so it isn’t real.
That child says “Prove it”. This is all the left has. “Prove it”. “Prove it”. “Prove it”.
As the saying goes “Ignorance is Bliss”
But I can’t prove this saying, so it isn’t real.
V
Victoria33
Guest
First they say “concede”, then they say “prove it”, well, it is being proven.
This was just a journalist or even private sleuth.
This was just a journalist or even private sleuth.
LeafByNiggle
Well-known member
No, the real question that should be asked is: what is the probability that someone else did vote on their behalf? Conspiracy theories often rely on confusing possibility with probability.
Then lobby to have the law changed in Michigan. But for now, the law is the law.
What is proven? Certainly not fraud.
Last edited:
- Status