Breakthrough to the Proof of God in Sciences

[kk23wong]

By the will of God, I have no doubts to publish the article below in this website which followers of God gathered. If you believe in God with Love in your heart, please read through it once.
NEVER deny the existence of the God. I am solving it by a scientific way. It is a BREAKTHROUGH.​

Scientific Approaches to the Existence of the God
The Only Proof of God valid in all aspects of sciences

BY Wong Ka Kit, Teru
Hong Kong, China
Published on 28 July 2009

The existence of God has been an argumentative topic in human history. No scientists have successfully proved the existence of God by valid scientific method. By the will of God, I am pleased to announce that the only proof of God by scientific approaches is being announced. The existence of God is no longer a myth. Sciences prove the existence of God because it is the truth. This article is the most influential one in human history which covered all religions in the world. It is not a hypothesis, but an ironic theory.

First, the statement “Light cannot burn.” It is a fact. Light cannot carry heat energy, but particles. Space is cold. Temperature is much lower than the planet inside. Sunlight goes through the space to reach the Earth. If it can carry heat, the space must not be cold. The temperature inside a planet varies by its natural mechanisms which we named it after an “Eco-system”. This phenomenon proved that the orbits and the distances from Sun in the solar system are not the decisive factors which account for the existences of lives inside the planets.

Second, another ironic theory derived from the phenomenon above is a statement as follow, “Planets are living things.” The natural mechanism so-called “eco-system” carried out the “Life Cycles” of the planets. Light is the only incoming source from Space. The natural mechanism of temperature control is built inside our bodies of all living things, so is the Earth. Universes, planets and living organisms inside are in different levels of lives.

Third, all planets have chemical components insides and can be reached by light. No how fast the speed of light travel. We can observe the stars on the sky because of the reflections of sunlight. Sunlight is necessary for the survival of the eco-system inside planets. Sunlight can reach all stars that we can observe. It does not carry any heat that is capable of influencing the temperature inside the planets. As a result, the sunlight which is the necessity for the eco-system is available in every one of them. Chemical components can be transformed into different forms under particular circumstances. In another words, every planet have lives. The regeneration the so-called eco-system inside planets is not always the case.

Forth, Infinity does not exist if we try to apply it with a timeline. It is the final solution to the existence of the concept of “Infinity” in mathematical ways. In another word, the universe is not infinity. If you apply infinity to the time, you cannot make the timeline become straight. As a result, we get the result of a factual statement that “Time is linear”. Universe must not be infinity (in English meaning). Thus, it has a limited capacity.

Fifth, the Bible stated clearly that there is only one God and she is everywhere. Applying this concept to the facts mentioned above, the God must be the Planet herself. Planet is a living thing in different levels of lives with comparisons to all habitants inside it. The definitions of living things have to be widened. Only the fact that “planet is conscious” can satisfy all these facts. Bible told us that we are the children of God can be rationalized under the scientific approaches to the statement that “Planets are living things”.

Sixth, the nature of Planet is mother. Female pregnant and give birth to children. The processes are taken place inside female bodies in our mother nature. Different levels of lives created different forms of existences. Planets rear their offspring (in this case, all living things) inside her body (the planets themselves). This explained the biological reasons for the occurrence of God.

It is a breakthrough for us to use scientific methods to prove the existence of the God. Sciences failed to prove the existence of God in the past. It is a failure, but it does not mean that the God does not exist. This article is the only scientific approach that can prove the existence of the God. It is nothing related to moral issues, but the all subjects of sciences. It must be valid.​

For references, look at my reply below.

 

[kk23wong]

Sorry, I have no intentions to push this post, but there is a word limit for each.

For Theorists, the inner content have to be read through the whole story of theories.

(1) Theory of the Similarities in-between Planets and Lives
(2) Theory of the Lighters’ Effects
(3) Theory of the Similarities of Chemical Exchanges (Under the post of "Oceanic Living Concept)
(4) Theory of Temperature Validations (Under the post of "the Origin of the Power of God)

For Philosophers & Scientists, please kindly read through the following after you have finished the above:

(1) Solution of “Infinity” in Mathematics
(2) Validity on Psychological Experiments
(3) Use of Animals in Psychological Experiments
(4) New Directions to Astronomy

For Catholic & Muslim, please read through Bible and googling “The Sounds of Silent” with **“Art & Music” **in another forum.
Please be reminded that the latter one is not only a piece of Art. It’s not a song, but a Journal.
It’s telling you the TRUTH.
My post “Concept of a Religious Plate” in this forum is not only a concept.

(1) Bible have to be read according to Time.
(2) Bible have to be illustrated with references to History.
(3) God is only one, but religions are plural.
(4) The only arrival from space is light. It’s the initial. (Please refer to the Origin of the Power of God/Theory of Temperature Validations)
(5) The power of god comes from birth, so “silent” can grows.

All of the above articles can be found on web through search engines. It’s an inappropriate to post the links here.

Open to all Discussions. Thank you very much.

 

[taylor2]

Applying this concept to the facts mentioned above, the God must be the Planet herself. Planet is a living thing in different levels of lives with comparisons to all habitants inside it. The definitions of living things have to be widened. Only the fact that “planet is conscious” can satisfy all these facts. Bible told us that we are the children of God can be rationalized under the scientific approaches to the statement that “Planets are living things”.

No, the bible teaches that God created the Earth and everything, seen and unseen. God had no beginning. If God was the Earth, then God would be subject to time and he would have had a beginning and would have been dependent on a creator. Also, if God were the Earth, then how could he have created all the other planets, etc, etc.

 

[liquidpele]

No, the bible teaches that God created the Earth and everything, seen and unseen. God had no beginning. If God was the Earth, then God would be subject to time and he would have had a beginning and would have been dependent on a creator. Also, if God were the Earth, then how could he have created all the other planets, etc, etc.

O’rly? Does the bible actually say God is infinite? That he’s beyond matter?

 

[Eucharisted]

That article is dripping with pride.

This caught my eye:

Fifth, the Bible stated clearly that there is only one God and she is everywhere. Applying this concept to the facts mentioned above, the God must be the Planet herself. Planet is a living thing in different levels of lives with comparisons to all habitants inside it. The definitions of living things have to be widened. Only the fact that “planet is conscious” can satisfy all these facts. Bible told us that we are the children of God can be rationalized under the scientific approaches to the statement that “Planets are living things”.

Fifth, the Bible stated clearly that there is only one God and she is everywhere

Fifth, the Bible stated clearly that there is only one God and she is everywhere

she

It lets me know one thing: not to trust the person who wrote the article.

 

[kk23wong]

No, the bible teaches that God created the Earth and everything, seen and unseen. God had no beginning. If God was the Earth, then God would be subject to time and he would have had a beginning and would have been dependent on a creator. Also, if God were the Earth, then how could he have created all the other planets, etc, etc.

Thank you for your reply.

Please read this article carefully if you really believe in God.
It is a scientific theory that can prove that God is only one.
We believe in God, so it need not to be proven.
It is not the case for those have no religious beliefs.
Please note that SCEINCES can prove the existence of God.
Belief in God will spread to everyone by sciences (Truth).
Are you going to give up? Give up your belief?
Read it carefully again.

Thank you & God Bless.

With reference to your questions,
(1) God created the world by the power of Birth.
(2) Light is the initial and only arrivals from Space.
(3) God had no beginnings? God Power come from Birth.
(4) God is always one.
(5) You are born. Tree can grows. Power of birth is the origin. Creator has the power.

---

“Why Paul has Cancer?”, I heard someone.

 

[kk23wong]

That article is dripping with pride.

This caught my eye: she

It lets me know one thing: not to trust the person who wrote the article.

Thank you very much for your reply.

Please be respected, do not use “it” on the God.

Power of birth come from light. God has the power.
You are inside, so she is everywhere.

It is your freedom to choose.
Destinies and fates.
Former by God. Latter by men.
You have granted the freedom by God.
Trust yourself, Believe in Love.
Truth is always neutral.

God Bless.

 

[FidesSpesCarita]

Ok, right from the first point “Light cannot carry heat energy”. True, but it is the cause of the majority of the heat we feel. Heat is “the physical manifestation of kinetic energy” where kinetic energy is defined by webster as “of or relating to the motion of MATERIAL bodies and the forces and energy associated therewith”. The impact of the photons (light particles) with solid matter is such that light will knock electrons out of their orbits into higher orbits, and they then want to return to their original energy level. So they release either another photon as fluorescence or heat (almost always they release both). This is not the only way to produce heat, but think about why it would get warmer when the Sun comes up.

“Every planet have lives”… grammar aside (since mine is often quite atrocious) , can planets be said to follow the most basic rules of life? Are they possessing of a capacity for growth? Do they have a functional activity? Do they eventually grow toward old age and die? Are they possessed of irritability, that is the ability to respond to external stimuli? Do they reproduce?

No.

For a theory or point to be ironic, it needs to be in some sense true. In fact, I would say that the only Ironic thing here is this “article”, because as wikipedia defines Irony:

Irony (from the Ancient Greek εἰρωνεία eirōneía, meaning hypocrisy, deception, or feigned ignorance) is a literary or rhetorical device, in which there is an incongruity or discordance between what one says or does and what one means or what is generally understood. Irony is a mode of expression that calls attention to the character’s knowledge and that of the audience.

This has definitely called attention to the authors intelligence and that of the audience.

I truly pray that your article was intended as a gag…

with love,

Geoff

 

[kk23wong]

Thank you very much for your reply.

Ok, right from the first point “Light cannot carry heat energy”. True, but it is the cause of the majority of the heat we feel. Heat is “the physical manifestation of kinetic energy” where kinetic energy is defined by webster as “of or relating to the motion of MATERIAL bodies and the forces and energy associated therewith”. The impact of the photons (light particles) with solid matter is such that light will knock electrons out of their orbits into higher orbits, and they then want to return to their original energy level. So they release either another photon as fluorescence or heat (almost always they release both). This is not the only way to produce heat, but think about why it would get warmer when the Sun comes up.

Space is Cold. I answered your questions.

“Every planet have lives”… grammar aside (since mine is often quite atrocious) , can planets be said to follow the most basic rules of life? Are they possessing of a capacity for growth? Do they have a functional activity? Do they eventually grow toward old age and die? Are they possessed of irritability, that is the ability to respond to external stimuli? Do they reproduce?

No.

Power of God from Birth. Basic rules can be applied. The system need to maintain a balance. Chemicals can be tranformed into various forms and may not tranform back. Regeneration of the planet is a common belief. It is not infinite. Infinity does not exists.

For a theory or point to be ironic, it needs to be in some sense true. In fact, I would say that the only Ironic thing here is this “article”, because as wikipedia defines Irony:

Irony (from the Ancient Greek εἰρωνεία eirōneía, meaning hypocrisy, deception, or feigned ignorance) is a literary or rhetorical device, in which there is an incongruity or discordance between what one says or does and what one means or what is generally understood. Irony is a mode of expression that calls attention to the character’s knowledge and that of the audience.

with love,

Geoff

It is the truth. Please kindly challenge it by facts.

God Bless,

Teru

 

[Harri_Laaksonen]

As a geologist and Catholic all I can say is Whoa.

kk23, you have an interesting syncretism of Buddhism, Christianity, and Gaia in a kind of pantheism.

You don’t seem to take into account the well known scientific principle of convergence of one kind of energy to another. In the case of light, various processes extend the wave length to move it from visible to infra-red (heat).

Many scientists who are also Christians understand that science and theology are not in conflict but both view the truth from differing viewpoints, but the truth remains unchanged.

Don’t give up the search. St. Thomas Aquinas spent much of his life doing just that as have other saints.

 

[kk23wong]

As a geologist and Catholic all I can say is Whoa.

kk23, you have an interesting syncretism of Buddhism, Christianity, and Gaia in a kind of pantheism.

You don’t seem to take into account the well known scientific principle of convergence of one kind of energy to another. In the case of light, various processes extend the wave length to move it from visible to infra-red (heat).

Many scientists who are also Christians understand that science and theology are not in conflict but both view the truth from differing viewpoints, but the truth remains unchanged.

Don’t give up the search. St. Thomas Aquinas spent much of his life doing just that as have other saints.

Buddhism, a mental state.

Light travel, convert to heat when reaching earth?
You don’t seem to have a very good senses.

Thank you.

God is always with me and the rest of my life.
She is everywhere.

God Bless.

 

[djeter]

And then there is this: Asking the Wrong Question…

payingattentiontothesky.com/2009/05/23/asking-the-wrong-question-a-meditation-on-the-question-%e2%80%9cdoes-god-exist%e2%80%9d/

Well worth your time. And by all means spend six minutes with Fr. Barron:

payingattentiontothesky.com/2009/07/28/letting-the-life-out/

Regards

dj

 

[FidesSpesCarita]

Thank you very much for your reply.

Space is Cold. I answered your questions.

Space is empty. Heat is the physical (I.E. matter) manifestation of kinetic energy thus in a sense you are correct. If light, according to your logic, did not carry heat than why is the surface of the moon on the light side on average 107 degrees C and on the night side -153 degrees c?

Power of God from Birth. Basic rules can be applied. The system need to maintain a balance. Chemicals can be tranformed into various forms and may not tranform back. Regeneration of the planet is a common belief. It is not infinite. Infinity does not exists.
chemical change is not a proof of life. When you add baking soda and vinegar you get a chemical change. That does not equal life.

It is the truth. Please kindly challenge it by facts.

God Bless,

Teru

In the end this comes down to whether you believe that God created the universe and everything in it or you believe that each planet is a god unto itself (which would logically fit your criteria for Godhood).

With love,

FSC

 

[kk23wong]

In the end this comes down to whether you believe that God created the universe and everything in it or you believe that each planet is a god unto itself (which would logically fit your criteria for Godhood).

With love,

FSC

I don’t believe in anything else but truth.

God exists.

Power of God come from Birth. Light arrived and transformed into the power of Birth.

Planet is a living thing.

Facts:
(1) Good and Evil come from birth. Admit it.
(2) Light cannot burn. Temperature rises.
(3) Life cycle inside your body. Eco-system inside a planet.

God Bless,

Teru

 

[wanstronian]

I have to say, I missed the scientific evidence that was claimed to exist in this article. Can anybody point it out to me? Thanks.

 

[kk23wong]

I have to say, I missed the scientific evidence that was claimed to exist in this article. Can anybody point it out to me? Thanks.

Scientific Evidences:
(1) Ecology: Eco-system = Life Cycle
(2) Fact: Light cannot heat. Temperature varies inisde planets.
(3) Astronomy: Space is cold. We are warm inside.
(4) Mathematics: Infinity=Zero in infinity. Put it on a timeline.
(5) Ecology: Theory of the Lighter Effects in Ecology. Ocean currents act as lighters. Ice blocks not just floating, but in the deep water.
(6) Biology: Female gives birth. Lives in different levels.
(7) Psychology: No Subjects or Objects are the same. All invalid.

Science must not be faked. It depends on truth.
No scientific evidences? You still know the facts.

God Bless,

Teru

 

[wanstronian]

Scientific Evidences:
(1) Ecology: Eco-system = Life Cycle
(2) Fact: Light cannot heat. Temperature varies inisde planets.
(3) Astronomy: Space is cold. We are warm inside.
(4) Mathematics: Infinity=Zero in infinity. Put it on a timeline.
(5) Ecology: Theory of the Lighter Effects in Ecology. Ocean currents act as lighters. Ice blocks not just floating, but in the deep water.
(6) Biology: Female gives birth. Lives in different levels.
(7) Psychology: No Subjects or Objects are the same. All invalid.

Science must not be faked. It depends on truth.
No scientific evidences? You still know the facts.

God Bless,

Teru

Hi,
I wonder if the language barrier is causing a problem here. None of your seven points above could be considered proof or evidence of any sort. And I can’t see any correlation between them at all, so I’m unsure how they’re supposed to indicate the existence of God?

 

[kk23wong]

Hi,
I wonder if the language barrier is causing a problem here. None of your seven points above could be considered proof or evidence of any sort. And I can’t see any correlation between them at all, so I’m unsure how they’re supposed to indicate the existence of God?

Languages are by geography, not the minds.

Proofs need to be gathered, like the Pillars.

The connections lie on the existence of God.
The main thread, “Living thing”.

Destiny is the will of God.
Fate is in our hands.

God Bless,

Teru

 

[kk23wong]

Infinity is a concept in Mathematics. Some may apply it into the universe. To prove the existences of God, I am hereby to post another foundings in mathematics to illustrate that the concept of infinity is invalid.

The solution is as follow:
Solution to “Infinity” in Mathematics

**BY **Wong Ka Kit, Teru
Hong Kong, China
Published on 14 July 2009

With regards to the question of “I(i)nfinity”, I am going to give all of you the final answer.
I am hereby to announce that “infinity” is no longer a myth.

Please be kindly reminded that the announcement of my explanation(s) to the mathematical term “infinity” is protected by Law(s) of your countries. With the will of the God, I am going to give all of you a new definition to all types of questions regarding to this term.

To begin with, I have to give brief description(s) to the term or word, “I(i)nfinity”

First, “Infinity”(and infinity) is a term or word meaning unlimited in English. It is a general agreement which has been recognized by dictionaries and the public.

Second, “Infinity”(and infinity) is a term or word which refers to “Zero” by referring to the equation-al explanation, “I(i)nfinity=Zero” or “I(i)nfinity=0”.

Third, “Infinity”(and infinity) is a term which cannot be measured or being replaced by other number [excluding symbol(s)].

After presenting the definition(s) of the term or word “Infinity”, I am going to give all of you a general idea of my concept. This concept has to be protected by law(s) of all countries which allow access to this web site(s), including all formats or URL(s). Thanks in advance.

“I(i)nfinity=Zero” and “I(i)nfinity=0” are mathematic equations recognized by US and all countries.

I(i)nfinity=0
0=I(i)nfinity
0=0

0=I(i)nfinity
[This equation refers to the number “Zero” is equal to the word/term “I(i)nfinity”.]

I(i)nfinity=0
[This equation refers to the word/term “I(i)nfinity” is equal to the number “Zero”.]

If I(i)nfinity = 0,
then 0=infinity.

Zero is only an expression of number [even some may refer it to the number of Zero (0)]. It can be marked on a linear (straight) line.

(<)-----(-2)-----(-1)-----(0)-----(1)-----(2)-----(>)

The above is a time line. The number (0)/Zero marked on this timeline refers to a digit only.
Please be reminded that the key of solving “I(i)nfinity” is the Timeline.

If I(i)nfinity=U(u)nlimited,
Then there will not be the number (0)/Zero marked on this timeline.

The arrow (<) on this timeline refers to other number(s) which is negative.
The arrow (>) on this timeline refers to other number(s) which is positive.

Please be noted that the number(s) in sequences adjacent with the directions of arrows (<)/(>)].

In this case, Zero/(0)/0 [which refers to infinity by the equation of (0=infinity or infinity=0)] is only an expression of number.

Time is linear. “Zero/(0)/0” is only a mark/a dot/a number/an expression of a particular point in the timeline (structural-like line).

As a result, “Zero/(0)/0” is the number which can substitute the term/word “I(i)nfinity”.

Ended.

Welcome to all Discussions.​

Truth cannot be distorted, like the existence of the God.

 

[TheWhim]

Well, sorry. Could you please elaborate further on your points?

Why should the concept of infinity as you described it be in any relation to the question of God’s existence?

I’m as puzzled as wanstronian until now.