Breakthrough to the Proof of God in Sciences

  • Thread starter Thread starter kk23wong
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
First, the statement “Light cannot burn.” It is a fact. Light cannot carry heat energy, but particles. Space is cold. Temperature is much lower than the planet inside. Sunlight goes through the space to reach the Earth. If it can carry heat, the space must not be cold. The temperature inside a planet varies by its natural mechanisms which we named it after an “Eco-system”. This phenomenon proved that the orbits and the distances from Sun in the solar system are not the decisive factors which account for the existences of lives inside the planets.

Light carries energy. Energy can take different forms and can change from.

Second, another ironic theory derived from the phenomenon above is a statement as follow, “Planets are living things.” The natural mechanism so-called “eco-system” carried out the “Life Cycles” of the planets. Light is the only incoming source from Space. The natural mechanism of temperature control is built inside our bodies of all living things, so is the Earth. Universes, planets and living organisms inside are in different levels of lives.

Only within very limited boundries.

Third, all planets have chemical components insides and can be reached by light. No how fast the speed of light travel. We can observe the stars on the sky because of the reflections of sunlight. Sunlight is necessary for the survival of the eco-system inside planets. Sunlight can reach all stars that we can observe. It does not carry any heat that is capable of influencing the temperature inside the planets. As a result, the sunlight which is the necessity for the eco-system is available in every one of them. Chemical components can be transformed into different forms under particular circumstances. In another words, every planet have lives. The regeneration the so-called eco-system inside planets is not always the case.

Wrong, the stars produce there own light, you are thinking about the planets.

Forth, Infinity does not exist if we try to apply it with a timeline. It is the final solution to the existence of the concept of “Infinity” in mathematical ways. In another word, the universe is not infinity. If you apply infinity to the time, you cannot make the timeline become straight. As a result, we get the result of a factual statement that “Time is linear”. Universe must not be infinity (in English meaning). Thus, it has a limited capacity.

We don’t understand enought about the universe to make any statements about infinity. Space and time are one, and time as we know it breaks down at the point of inflation, so any speculation is pointless.

Fifth, the Bible stated clearly that there is only one God and she is everywhere. Applying this concept to the facts mentioned above, the God must be the Planet herself. Planet is a living thing in different levels of lives with comparisons to all habitants inside it. The definitions of living things have to be widened. Only the fact that “planet is conscious” can satisfy all these facts. Bible told us that we are the children of God can be rationalized under the scientific approaches to the statement that “Planets are living things”.

What does the bible have to do with anything?
**
Sixth, the nature of Planet is mother. Female pregnant and give birth to children. The processes are taken place inside female bodies in our mother nature. Different levels of lives created different forms of existences. Planets rear their offspring (in this case, all living things) inside her body (the planets themselves). This explained the biological reasons for the occurrence of God.**

:confused: ok

It is a breakthrough for us to use scientific methods to prove the existence of the God. Sciences failed to prove the existence of God in the past. It is a failure, but it does not mean that the God does not exist. This article is the only scientific approach that can prove the existence of the God. It is nothing related to moral issues, but the all subjects of sciences. It must be valid.
---------------

And it has still failed…
 
TheWhim said:
Well, sorry. Could you please elaborate further on your points?

Why should the concept of infinity as you described it be in any relation to the question of God’s existence?

I’m as puzzled as wanstronian until now.
Click to expand...
I’m puzzled by the entire thing.

kk23wong it is impossilbe to get any sort of idea of what you are trying to present, your need to correct the notation.

b-core.com/ONLINEDOC/MathsNotation.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_mathematical_symbols

I’m getting the feeling this is supposted to be a joke.
 
Charles_Darwin said:
**First, the statement “Light cannot burn.” **
Light carries energy. Energy can take different forms and can change from.

Second, another ironic theory derived from the phenomenon above is a statement as follow, “Planets are living things.” The natural mechanism so-called “eco-system” carried out the “Life Cycles” of the planets. Light is the only incoming source from Space. The natural mechanism of temperature control is built inside our bodies of all living things, so is the Earth. Universes, planets and living organisms inside are in different levels of lives.
Only within very limited boundries.

We can observe the stars on the sky because of the reflections of sunlight.
Wrong, the stars produce there own light, you are thinking about the planets.

Forth, Infinity does not exist if we try to apply it with a timeline.
We don’t understand enought about the universe to make any statements about infinity. Space and time are one, and time as we know it breaks down at the point of inflation, so any speculation is pointless.

Fifth, the Bible stated clearly that there is only one God and she is everywhere.
What does the bible have to do with anything?
Click to expand...
Thank you very much for your reply. God is always with you.
  1. Light travel through space to reach the Earth. Journey in Space. It is cold.
  2. Different Levels of Lives. Combination of Biology and Ecology. Limited in Sciences.
  3. Stars are planets. They are not those on wallpaper in screen.
  4. Infinity is a word. Please kindly check dictionary. Mathematic tried to define it. Prove it with a timeline to examine its existence. No infinity, how to apply?
  5. God is one. Religions are plural.
If you believe in god, no need to be proven.
If not, questions me.

Thank you. God Bless.

Teru
 
Charles_Darwin said:
I’m puzzled by the entire thing.

kk23wong it is impossilbe to get any sort of idea of what you are trying to present, your need to correct the notation.

b-core.com/ONLINEDOC/MathsNotation.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_mathematical_symbols

I’m getting the feeling this is supposted to be a joke.
Click to expand...
Wikipedia cannot be used for references if you are academic.

Joke cannot be made on the existence of God.

Please kindly spare some time to read through all these I mentioned above.

Thank you. God Bless.

Teru
 
kk23wong said:
Wikipedia cannot be used for references if you are academic.

Joke cannot be made on the existence of God.

Please kindly spare some time to read through all these I mentioned above.

Thank you. God Bless.

Teru
Click to expand...
Really? Why not, i often referenced it at uni, as long as the page itself was referenced. On the other hand i was never allowed to make up notation when i was handing in math courseworks, or when i was sitting maths exams (well i was allowed, but i would have failed).

I’m pretty sure you are trolling now.
 
Charles_Darwin said:
Really? Why not, i often referenced it at uni, as long as the page itself was referenced. On the other hand i was never allowed to make up notation when i was handing in math courseworks, or when i was sitting maths exams (well i was allowed, but i would have failed).

I’m pretty sure you are trolling now.
Click to expand...
Evolution is not a joke.

If dinosaurs died of Ice Ages, you are not here.

You may have an answer.

A man of wisdom is a gift by birth. A gift from God.

I hope love will be in your heart.

God Bless.

Teru
 
God in a puddle

splashing but then a duck quacks

Jesus joins the fun
 
liquidpele said:
God in a puddle

splashing but then a duck quacks

Jesus joins the fun
Click to expand...
A Duck is a duck.

Quack is not a brake.

Truth is the murderer. Killer is fact.

Truth is always one.

Science died of fake.

Philosophy will never be dead if you are your own master.

Minds are power. Knowledge is the pillar.

God is not fake.

Truth is always.

Philosophers will not kill. Truth may save. Lies will dead.

Directions are given. Knowledge and Rationality are rules.

Proved the God in sciences is a way to give you beliefs.

You have freedom to choose, by the will of God.

God let you decide. Freedom from God.

Life will not be a mess, if you have minds.

Love in souls bring you peace.

It’s not a song, but answer to your questions.

God Bless,

Teru
 
kk23wong said:
I don’t believe in anything else but truth.

God exists.

Power of God come from Birth. Light arrived and transformed into the power of Birth.

Planet is a living thing.

Facts:
(1) Good and Evil come from birth. Admit it.
(2) Light cannot burn. Temperature rises.
(3) Life cycle inside your body. Eco-system inside a planet.

God Bless,

Teru
Click to expand...
Welcome, Teru:

With all due respect, everyone who has responded to your opening proposition has given you a cogent answer. Your proposition is: light travels to earth with coldness and in coldness. However, earth gets warm and is warm. Since light does not warm anything else along the way from sun to earth, how is this possible?

You have received several answers that describe exactly how. The mystery of how photons carry kinetic energy, which is then transformed to heat energy by way of electron dislocation, is the same kind of way that heat is transmitted from any source, such as radiant heat, or heat produced by the friction of molecules.

We have stove tops that can increase the agitation of the molecules of certain metals, normally iron, to produce heat. Men can make iron pots, put cold food into them, place them on a cold surface, put a paper dollar bill on the surface above the magnetic coil, place the cold pot with cold food on the dollar bill and heat the food without burning the dollar bill. This is not done (at least directly) by God, nor is it done by magic. It occurs simply because we were able to hypothesize that it should, tested it and voilà! it did occur.

This description of a magnetic force, traveling through substances that are not affected by magnetism, striking substances that are affected by magnetism, causing the substances so struck to essentially heat themselves, is sort of what happens when light photons get to earth. If light strikes an object, such as an asteroid, or a man-made space vehicle of some sort, it will become warm when light hits it… Since it does not have the atmospheric envelope surrounding it as the earth does, the heat will quickly dissipate into the coldness of empty space. If space was not virtually completely empty, it too would be warmed.

God has done marvelous things. He has set up an ordered process by which the things needed for life occur. That light can, in a sense, release its stored heat after arriving here, is one of them. But, it is not, by itself, a proof. It may answer why “space” is needed between us and the sun. Potentially, if a dense cloud of space dust existed between earth and sun, we wouldn’t get any heat at all. That is the nightmare of the nuclear holocaust.

God bless,
jd
 
JDaniel said:
Welcome, Teru:

With all due respect, everyone who has responded to your opening proposition has given you a cogent answer. Your proposition is: light travels to earth with coldness and in coldness. However, earth gets warm and is warm. Since light does not warm anything else along the way from sun to earth, how is this possible?

You have received several answers that describe exactly how. The mystery of how photons carry kinetic energy, which is then transformed to heat energy by way of electron dislocation, is the same kind of way that heat is transmitted from any source, such as radiant heat, or heat produced by the friction of molecules.

We have stove tops that can increase the agitation of the molecules of certain metals, normally iron, to produce heat. Men can make iron pots, put cold food into them, place them on a cold surface, put a paper dollar bill on the surface above the magnetic coil, place the cold pot with cold food on the dollar bill and heat the food without burning the dollar bill. This is not done (at least directly) by God, nor is it done by magic. It occurs simply because we were able to hypothesize that it should, tested it and voilà! it did occur.

This description of a magnetic force, traveling through substances that are not affected by magnetism, striking substances that are affected by magnetism, causing the substances so struck to essentially heat themselves, is sort of what happens when light photons get to earth. If light strikes an object, such as an asteroid, or a man-made space vehicle of some sort, it will become warm when light hits it… Since it does not have the atmospheric envelope surrounding it as the earth does, the heat will quickly dissipate into the coldness of empty space. If space was not virtually completely empty, it too would be warmed.

God has done marvelous things. He has set up an ordered process by which the things needed for life occur. That light can, in a sense, release its stored heat after arriving here, is one of them. But, it is not, by itself, a proof. It may answer why “space” is needed between us and the sun. Potentially, if a dense cloud of space dust existed between earth and sun, we wouldn’t get any heat at all. That is the nightmare of the nuclear holocaust.

God bless,
jd
Click to expand...
Light travel through space. Space is cold. The Earth is warm. I am hot. You have the answer in sciences. Possible not by my words, but facts.

Radiations in laboratory. You have it outside, but not a mechanical system. Purposes made it heat, not in space.

Chemical Exchanges are natural processes. Man can create, so is the nature.

The God does not need to prove herself. She exists, so are we. You know she, because you believe. Scientists know what my stance is.

Nuclear is not the only way to solve the problem. Their theory works, they must have proved the existences of the God. If not, the other ways round.

Peace if you believe in the God. Only facts can challenge the truth.

God Bless.

Teru
 
Oh please. No offence but that article is ridiculous. The existence of God cannot be discovered by our current scientific method. When we say that God can be the subject of science we are not referring to the scientific method, we are referring to the older definitions of the word “science”. That is we can know the existence of God for certain by the works of his hands.

Anyone that says they have a new breakthrough scientifc (method) discovery that proves the existance of God has my extreme skepticism.
 
Matthias123 said:
Oh please. No offence but that article is ridiculous. The existence of God cannot be discovered by our current scientific method. When we say that God can be the subject of science we are not referring to the scientific method, we are referring to the older definitions of the word “science”. That is we can know the existence of God for certain by the works of his hands.

Anyone that says they have a new breakthrough scientifc (method) discovery that proves the existance of God has my extreme skepticism.
Click to expand...
Thank you for your reply.

I guess you may come arcoss some diffculties on interpreting the theories I have mentioned in the articles. Let me explain it a brief way.

First, my hopothesis is the statement as follow: “Planets are living things.”

Second, it is supported by facts.
  1. Light travel through Space, but it is cold. With comparison to the Space, the temperature of the Earth is higher.
  2. The stars on the sky are the reflections of sunlight. Light have to reach the planets in order to generate reflections. In another word, they have the source of light from space which is necessary for the existence of lives in planets.
  3. Life cycles inside a planet is the eco-system. We named it after eco-system, but this mechanism is inside the planets, as other living things do.
  4. Biologically, offsprings are generated by the reproduction processes by birth. Planets carry out their reproduction processes inside their existences. The categorization of gender of a planet must be female in biological expanations.
  5. Lives at different levels. Planets are living things. You cannot generate any substancee out of none. The power of God come from light. Transformed into the power of birth. Lives are proofs of the existence of the God.
Third, I named my discovery as “Teru Hypothesis” or the “Theory of the Similarities of Lives”.

It proved the existence of the God. Non-religious will believe in the God after the announcement of my theory.

Please send to related institutions if you think it worths.

God Bless.

Teru​

I know her.
 
kk23wong said:
Thank you for your reply.

I guess you may come arcoss some diffculties on interpreting the theories I have mentioned in the articles. Let me explain it a brief way.

First, my hopothesis is the statement as follow: “Planets are living things.”

Second, it is supported by facts.
  1. Light travel through Space, but it is cold. With comparison to the Space, the temperature of the Earth is higher.
  2. The stars on the sky are the reflections of sunlight. Light have to reach the planets in order to generate reflections. In another word, they have the source of light from space which is necessary for the existence of lives in planets.
  3. Life cycles inside a planet is the eco-system. We named it after eco-system, but this mechanism is inside the planets, as other living things do.
  4. Biologically, offsprings are generated by the reproduction processes by birth. Planets carry out their reproduction processes inside their existences. The categorization of gender of a planet must be female in biological expanations.
  5. Lives at different levels. Planets are living things. You cannot generate any substancee out of none. The power of God come from light. Transformed into the power of birth. Lives are proofs of the existence of the God.
Third, I named my discovery as “Teru Hypothesis” or the “Theory of the Similarities of Lives”.

It proved the existence of the God. Non-religious will believe in the God after the announcement of my theory.

Please send to related institutions if you think it worths.

God Bless.

Teru​

I know her.
Click to expand...
I not going to go into the validity of this arguement. I just want to know why you think it adds up to a “scientific proof” as apposed to a philosophical proof?
 
kk23wong said:
Buddhism, a mental state.

Light travel, convert to heat when reaching earth?
You don’t seem to have a very good senses.

Thank you.

God is always with me and the rest of my life.
She is everywhere.

God Bless…
Non-religious will believe in the God after the announcement of my theory…
Click to expand...
You have proven pantheism to yourself, planets may have living things in and on them, thus be a system of interrelated life but planets as living “beings” is not supported by a planet having life in its essence. Planets formed, they didn’t copulate and birth a universe. Your theory uses a definition for life that is beyond any known scientific and philosophical standard. Non-religious may agree, only because they don’t know the difference between “a being greater than which nothing can be conceived” and “light particles”.

Catholics cannot agree with this as God is transcendent and calls Himself “Father” to His children. As God is father and like a human father is “transcendent” to the creation of a child, God cannot be SHE. That would depict an immanence that is antithetical to our theology, New Age practices erroneously added to our faith notwithstanding.

As God in the Second Person of the Trinity has appeared to us and has returned to the Father, we invite you to investigate the faith that gives us the grace to be fully the humans God intends us to be. This is not theoretical but is lived out everyday in multitudes of believing Catholics, me included.
 
Earnest_Bunbury said:
You have proven pantheism to yourself, planets may have living things in and on them, thus be a system of interrelated life but planets as living “beings” is not supported by a planet having life in its essence. Planets formed, they didn’t copulate and birth a universe. Your theory uses a definition for life that is beyond any known scientific and philosophical standard. Non-religious may agree, only because they don’t know the difference between “a being greater than which nothing can be conceived” and “light particles”.

Catholics cannot agree with this as God is transcendent and calls Himself “Father” to His children. As God is father and like a human father is “transcendent” to the creation of a child, God cannot be SHE. That would depict an immanence that is antithetical to our theology, New Age practices erroneously added to our faith notwithstanding.

As God in the Second Person of the Trinity has appeared to us and has returned to the Father, we invite you to investigate the faith that gives us the grace to be fully the humans God intends us to be. This is not theoretical but is lived out everyday in multitudes of believing Catholics, me included.
Click to expand...
You will be bought in front of the God.

Sciences will convince you.

If you beleieve in the God, read those articles carefully.

I welcome all discussions not only religious, but have to be rational.

God Bless.

Teru
 
kk23wong said:
You will be bought in front of the God.

Sciences will convince you.

If you beleieve in the God, read those articles carefully.

I welcome all discussions not only religious, but have to be rational.

God Bless.

Teru
Click to expand...
Gnosticism and psudo-mysticism now, as well as pantheism. A defining of doctrine.

It doesn’t answer the fact that “life” as you define it is beyond all known definitions.
 
Earnest_Bunbury said:
Gnosticism and psudo-mysticism now, as well as pantheism. A defining of doctrine.

It doesn’t answer the fact that “life” as you define it is beyond all known definitions.
Click to expand...
Sciences will prove. Life is a living, an experience.

Everyone has life during lifetime.

Biosphere, Lithosphere, Hydrosphere.

The past has passed.

My hypothesis of the statement, “Planets are living things”.

Prove it by Astronomy, Biology, Ecology.

In one word, sciences.

Challenge by facts. If you have doubts to eleborate the point here.

Ask a scientist for help. They’re expert.

God Bless.

Teru
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top