V
Vico
Guest
I see you are in California. I was raised there and experienced the pre-Vatican II Mass, as an altar boy. Many people had problem with the Latin I think, (we had to memorize it). There was less involvement (call-response), and in 1969 I was playing guitar at the folk mass. At another parish, I attended a rock Mass (there were electric guitars and a drum set near the altar area.) It was a truly strange era.I grew up in the pre-Vatican II Latin church and have NO interest in returning to that time, either for the Mass or the counter-reformation attitudes that were so prevalent then. I believe, as many, many of us did at the time of Vat. II, that the Spirit was very alive and very active in bringing fresh air to the Latin church. Unfortunately, in my opinion and those of many of my contemporaries who had such hope, much of that “fresh air” has become stagnant once again by the action of walking-back some of the important and principle thought underlying the outward changes. I can understand the EF proponents’ claims that the OF is less reverent, more casual – but it is no longer meant to be a “me and God” action, it is a community Eucharist – all of us at Mass giving thanks for the salvific action of Jesus and sharing His Body. As one poster noted, the whole of society has changed in this same way.
I spent a month in France this spring touring cathedrals and attending (OF) liturgies whenever and wherever I could. I think the one element that makes our OF Masses in the US appear less reverent is the music – and I say this as one who participated in the “guitarization” of the Mass in the 70’s and 80’s. Unfortunately, when there is no money to pay professionals, you get volunteers who are not musically trained or sophisticated, nor are they liturgically knowledgeable – and our Masses have become the poorer for it (except, of course, in their essence).
I just wrote all that as this thread has become yet another rant about EF vs OF – but what I really came to this thread for was the explanation of the differences between the Byzantine Rite and the Roman Rite – and I have to say I loved the chart, even in its simplicity – I got it - I understand now – and I thank the poster for it. I don’t think you were wrong to portray the Latin Mass exactly as you did – it is the norm for Eucharistic celebrations in the US, which is what you were trying to do. Even in the more formal liturgies I attended in France, your portrayal is spot on.
Thanks!
(To the ranters: No need to argue against what I wrote above – I won’t engage.)
Later I began assisting at the Byzantine Divine Liturgy, after I decided not to be a priest (I was in pre-seminary). The chant is so reverent.