B
BVMFatima
Guest
You mentioned that it kinda was in communion, and since it was orthodox I didn’t know if you were referring to the great schism or the Orthododx Churches reuniteing with rome etc.What do you mean with that?
You mentioned that it kinda was in communion, and since it was orthodox I didn’t know if you were referring to the great schism or the Orthododx Churches reuniteing with rome etc.What do you mean with that?
Ever heard of the false union of Florence?You mentioned that it kinda was in communion, and since it was orthodox I didn’t know if you were referring to the great schism or the Orthododx Churches reuniteing with rome etc.
Sounds familiarEver heard of the false union of Florence?
It was a Catholic cathedral from its foundation in AD 360 until the schism when there gradually became a distinction between us and the Orthodox; in 1204 it was sacked by Crusaders of the Latin Church (a shameful occurrence for which the Latin Church is very sorry) and became again a Catholic cathedral until 1261, at which point it was again converted to a Greek Orthodox cathedral until the city was overrun by Muslim hordes in 1453.It was not a Catholic church, but an Orthodox one.
Perhaps an easier way to think about it …Really? Well why do Byzantine Catholics honor it if it was Orthodox? They are not in communion with us
No mention of the sack of Constantinople by Latin Crusaders is complete without mention of the riots in 1182. Scholar Dr. Warren Carroll says…It was a Catholic cathedral from its foundation in AD 360 until the schism when there gradually became a distinction between us and the Orthodox; in 1204 it was sacked by Crusaders of the Latin Church (a shameful occurrence for which the Latin Church is very sorry) and became again a Catholic cathedral until 1261, at which point it was again converted to a Greek Orthodox cathedral until the city was overrun by Muslim hordes in 1453.
Well we can all be proud of the outcome, as it relates to the OP.The boys in the east babes in the woods, not quite.
The loss of Constantinople and the Hagia Sophia is not the outcome of events in 1204 but rather an event in 1054.Well we can all be proud of the outcome, as it relates to the OP.
Hagia Sophia, the center of Byzantine Christianity (Orthodox and Catholic) is now a museum. If you wish to pray there, be prepared to spend time in a Turkish prison.
1054 was in some ways the beginning of a process, and in some ways also the culmination of an unfortunate series of events. It was a turning point that we say marks the beginning of the East-West Schism. The Church at that point did not cleanly split into two. 1204 contributed notoriously to the acrimonious split. However, the division we see between Catholic and Orthodox in the modern times is the aggravated result of 1000 years of separation. The Schism continues to act as a wedge today, although there are also meaningful efforts to reduce and soothe the wounds with an ultimate hope of unity.The loss of Constantinople and the Hagia Sophia is not the outcome of events in 1204 but rather an event in 1054.
This is correct.At first when I read your words about the “loss of Constantinople and the Hagia Sophia” I thought you were saying that the Western Church lost it. But they were truly lost when the Muslim hordes captured them, and I am sure this is what you meant.
Like you I have been told that anyone who appears to pray inside Hagia Sophia with any outward gestures (sign of the Cross, kneeling, prayer rope) will at the least be escorted out if not arrested. Christian clergy are not allowed to wear clerical garb on the streets. Our deacon was there last year. It sounded like he saw a priest in his cassock out on the street within the Phanar/Fener which was an “improvement” compared to his previous trip a few years before.Well we can all be proud of the outcome, as it relates to the OP.
Hagia Sophia, the center of Byzantine Christianity (Orthodox and Catholic) is now a museum. If you wish to pray there, be prepared to spend time in a Turkish prison.
Except for the Italo-Albanians.In 1453 the Byzantine Catholics were Orthodox.
And a few Basilian monks in Rome, IIRC.Except for the Italo-Albanians.
Nothing ¨false¨ about it.Ever heard of the false union of Florence?
This was a well done segment. Highly recommend it!60 Minutes “Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew feels Crucified”(CBS) seems to have gotten most of it right in their program a couple of years ago about the Orthodox Church in Turkey.
Why then did the union collapse within a few years? Why then did most of the Orthodox bishops repudiate the union as soon as they got back?Nothing ¨false¨ about it.