C-Sections

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chris_LaRock
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Chris_LaRock

Guest
Were C-Section child birthing techniques ever shunned by the church?
 
RWMorris said:
I don’t think so…surely not!
Click to expand...
Cool. I just figured that some people would see it as a perversion of the natural way to give birth. But sometimes it’s not medically possible to give birth naturally because of complications, such as when a baby is tangled up in the cord.
 
You mean all c-sections or elective ones like they tend to have in Brazil nowdays?
 
Chris_LaRock said:
Were C-Section child birthing techniques ever shunned by the church?
Click to expand...
I certainly hope not. I had to have one because my baby was too large for me me to deliver naturally (although I wanted too). In cases like this, it saves both the baby and the mother. I don’t see why the church would have a problem with that.
 
kind_bean said:
I certainly hope not. I had to have one because my baby was too large for me me to deliver naturally (although I wanted too). In cases like this, it saves both the baby and the mother. I don’t see why the church would have a problem with that.
Click to expand...
My mom had all 4 of us kids by c-section. (I was small, but had a big head):rotfl:
 
The post about c-sections in Brazil made me think. The motivations are critical here. Vaginal birth is best for the baby unless there is a complication. If one elects to have a c-section for convenience or vanity, I don’t think that would be condoned. It’s all in the motivation. All procedures and medicines, etc. need to be done with the right motivation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top