CAF vs general population

  • Thread starter Thread starter commenter
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I care about pro life but I cannot 100% support the Republican party on that issue alone. There are other stances they make I don’t think I relate to
 
Jump4Joy said:
I care about pro life but I cannot 100% support the Republican party on that issue alone. There are other stances they make I don’t think I relate to
Click to expand...
How about Gay Marriage? How about forcing Catholic Nuns to pay for birth control? How about assisted suicide?
 
Last edited:
I’ve never heard of the forcing nuns to pay for birth control. The rest I’ve heard of. Idk how to feel about gay marriage
 
The Little Sisters of the Poor were involved in a lawsuit because of the Obama administration’s HHS Contraceptive Mandate which meant every employer had to pay for its employees contraception through their health insurance. Religious expections not allowed.
So off to Court the Sisters went…
 
I understand where you are coming from. But we have to take in degree of seriousness here. Personally, I’m against capital punishment and agree with the Democrats on that issue. However, I’m also pro-life, against Gay “marriage” and assisted suicide.

In the grand scheme of things, abortion, Gay “marriage” and assisted suicide are bigger issues than gun control and climate change. True, guns can help kill people, but not all guns are bad. Climate change might be happening, but that isn’t killing anyone. Abortion is wrong every single time it occurs. Gay “marriage” is wrong every single time it happens. Assisted suicide is wrong every single time it happens.
 
So I’m curious, how much lower are the premiums now that they curtailed bc coverage?
 
I wish we could vote on issues not through political parties. I’m not a fan of our current president. Healthcare, student loans, etc are other issues that concern me.
 
If only we heeded Washington’s words. We wouldn’t be in this mess.
 
It seems a little strange to vote for a presidential candidate based on those three issues alone
 
It’s not so much the number of issues as it is the gravity of the issues.
 
He warned us against forming political parties in his farewell address, among other things.
 
That’s a difficult one considering 2016 choices of presidential candidates. Maybe 2020 presidential candidates will make the voting options easier
 
Last edited:
You mean between two candidates. I want to more informed the next time I vote.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top