T
twinc
Guest
Did Cain go to hell and Abel to heaven - any comments - twinc
Cain went to hell and Abel to heaven, because in marking Cain God guaranteed that vengeance would be reserved to himself, and this would have been unnecessary unless he were planning to send him to hell, and because Abel’s blood cried out to heaven from the earth, Abel could not have gone all the way to hell, and so must have gone to heaven.Did Cain go to hell and Abel to heaven - any comments - twinc
Cain went to hell and Abel to heaven, because in marking Cain God guaranteed that vengeance would be reserved to himself, and this would have been unnecessary unless he were planning to send him to hell, and because Abel’s blood cried out to heaven from the earth, Abel could not have gone all the way to hell, and so must have gone to heaven./QUO
so you reckon heaven is up and hell down - but what is up or down compared to earth - twinc
Up and down are metaphorical.so you reckon heaven is up and hell down - but what is up or down compared to earth - twinc
[/quote]Apollos;6829805:
Up and down are gravitational terms; down is the direction of gravity, under ones feet, and up is the opposite direction, above ones head. Away from earth’s gravity, the terms have no meaning; consider the astronauts who can live quite comfortably with the ground “above” their heads. So in the higher cosmos, up and down would reflect a deeper aspect of being than simply the gravitational force on ones form.Cain went to hell and Abel to heaven, because in marking Cain God guaranteed that vengeance would be reserved to himself, and this would have been unnecessary unless he were planning to send him to hell, and because Abel’s blood cried out to heaven from the earth, Abel could not have gone all the way to hell, and so must have gone to heaven.[/QUO
so you reckon heaven is up and hell down - but what is up or down compared to earth - twinc
OTOH, Robert Bellarmine believed Hell to be at earth’s center, literally down; and presumably he was not alone in this interpretation.
ICXC NIKA
For a very long time I overlooked that portion of scripture that said that Judas repented and only saw his failure and death.‘But first we must struggle with the demon of dejection who casts the soul into despair. We must drive him from our heart. It was this demon that did not allow Cain to repent after he had killed his brother, or Judas after he had betrayed his Master.’
3 Then Judas, who betrayed him, when he saw that he was condemned, repented himself, and brought back the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders, 4 saying, I have sinned in that I betrayed innocent blood. But they said, What is that to us? see thou to it. 5 And he cast down the pieces of silver into the sanctuary, and departed; and he went away and hanged himself.
Matt 27:3-5 (ASV)
They spoke Hebrew. At the tower of Babel, the line of Shem was spared the curse out of respect for the Messiah to be born of it.Who knows, perhaps we’ll find out when we go to heaven. Of course, we’ll have to ask around for quite some while to find him (given that he lived an indefinitely long time ago), and then we’ll have to find some way to talk to him, as we have no way of knowing what language he spoke.
It’s normally a misguided and misleading statement to say ‘never definitively held’ a ‘particular person’ is in Hell, this is not the case once one reads Revelation on the particular people condemned to Hell there. It is also not the case that to draw from this misguided statement that one can believe no one is in Hell because there isn’t a long list of people by name condemned there.The Church has a canon of saints, but she does not have a canon of the damned. She has never definitively held that any particular person is in hell. We don’t even know for certain that Judas Iscariot is in hell – though the outlook for him seems pretty poor, given that Jesus said it would have been better for him if he had never been born. The saints have their opinions on this subject, but these are opinions and not articles of faith, however well-founded they are; and I think it’s a safe bet that any saint who was of the opinion that Cain is in hell would be very pleased to have been proven wrong.
It is not our place to speculate on the damnation, let alone decree the damnation of specific individuals. Or can you peer into the souls of one who died millenia ago?Cain went to hell and Abel to heaven, because in marking Cain God guaranteed that vengeance would be reserved to himself, and this would have been unnecessary unless he were planning to send him to hell, and because Abel’s blood cried out to heaven from the earth, Abel could not have gone all the way to hell, and so must have gone to heaven.
Without speculation, we would not have John of the Cross or Thomas Aquinas. Since the Church has not ruled definitively on the fate of Cain or Abel, let’s discuss it. We learn more in the process of discussion than we do by reaching an answer. My conclusion is obviously not based on peering into anyone’s soul, but on all the available information we have about their lives.It is not our place to speculate on the damnation, let alone decree the damnation of specific individuals. Or can you peer into the souls of one who died millenia ago?
The Church has two positions about the state of a soul:Without speculation, we would not have John of the Cross or Thomas Aquinas. Since the Church has not ruled definitively on the fate of Cain or Abel, let’s discuss it. We learn more in the process of discussion than we do by reaching an answer. My conclusion is obviously not based on peering into anyone’s soul, but on all the available information we have about their lives.
The Church has two positions about the state of a soul:
*]the person is in heaven (Canonization)
*]their fate is unknown
Notice that "the person is definitely in Hell is not a choice. We know nothing of the circumstances surrounding Cain’s death, so as such we cannot know his eternal fate.
I am trying to get you to admit that we cannot declare Cain as damned to hell.Okay, so your issue is with my level of certainty. And how does that further the conversation?