M
Mr.Ex_Nihilo
Guest
The difference, first of all, is that not all religions say you are going to a bad place if you don’t believe as they do. And, second of all, one has to arrive at this either/or decision wager well after they’ve examined the claims of each religion presented to them and evaluated them in light of what they claim.I fear you wont get as much mileage as you hope. Every atheist, doubter, etc has heard this one ad nauseum. The answer…the same thing you will do if it turns out that some other religions belief is true and you, not having lived THEIR faith, has to confront something very different than expected.
What if THEY are right? And there are many gods and you didn’t honor them as they want, or the Catholic church did go astray and some Protestant group is right, or Mormons, or Islam, or whatever? We all have to make choices and live with them and the consequences,none of us can hedge all our bets. We are all in the same boat as far as that goes. We make a choice, and live, and die, with the consequences.
If we end up being wrong, then so be it. Isn’t that what you are doing as well? Living in faith that you are right?
What’s the difference?
cheddar
I don’t know of anyone who believed in God because of Pascal’s Wager. It’s more of an afterthought which simply confirms what they already investigated and believe to be true.
Nonetheless, the basic gist of the wager is true. If there is indeed a possibility of an after-life, and if there is indeed a way to save one’s life in the after-life, then people are responsible for investigating this possibility further.
In other words, if the possibility of an after-life exists, then simply assuming there is no after-life and that all existence is essentially void after death is not an option. In this sense, the wager asks people to look further into the claims of the various religions in order to more carefully select which one they believe to be true.