Can a marriage ever be blessed by the church if

  • Thread starter Thread starter Karen_Anne
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
K

Karen_Anne

Guest
Does anyone know if a marriage can be blessed by the church if one of the spouses is not a “willing participant”? In other words, must both parties agree or is the desire of one to live within the teachings of the Church enough to get a priest to bless the marriage?

Karen Anne
 
Yes, both must be consenting parties for the marriage to be valid. If not, then I would think it would be grounds for annulment.
 
I know to get married in the church, you have to have some agreement about raising the children Catholic. I’m not sure, but I would think that both spouses would also have to be willing to get the blessing. Hopefully someone else can help you with that. Why in the world wouldn’t the other person accept a blessing, if for no other reason than the love of the spouse?

John
 
40.png
yochumjy:
I know to get married in the church, you have to have some agreement about raising the children Catholic. I’m not sure, but I would think that both spouses would also have to be willing to get the blessing. Hopefully someone else can help you with that. Why in the world wouldn’t the other person accept a blessing, if for no other reason than the love of the spouse?

John
It can be a forced decision–either by the parents or by circumstances. Love isn’t the only reason why people get married (well, the other reasons aren’t really just).
 
<<Why in the world wouldn’t the other person accept a blessing, if for no other reason than the love of the spouse?>>

It is not a matter of accepting a blessing, but rather not wanting to hypocritically participate in a religious ceremony that they personally do not believe in.

Karen Anne
 
Karen Anne:
Does anyone know if a marriage can be blessed by the church if one of the spouses is not a “willing participant”? In other words, must both parties agree or is the desire of one to live within the teachings of the Church enough to get a priest to bless the marriage?
To regularize an invalid marriage by convalidation, the active participation of both parties is required.

An invalid marriage can also be regularized by sanatio in radice (a.k.a. radical sanation, a.k.a. retroactive validation) under certain conditions. In this case, participation of your spouse would not be required. In fact, the spouse need not even be told about it.

Sanatio in radice requires the approval of your bishop, which your priest can help you request.
 
40.png
Catholic2003:
To regularize an invalid marriage by convalidation, the active participation of both parties is required.

An invalid marriage can also be regularized by sanatio in radice (a.k.a. radical sanation, a.k.a. retroactive validation) under certain conditions. In this case, participation of your spouse would not be required. In fact, the spouse need not even be told about it.

Sanatio in radice requires the approval of your bishop, which your priest can help you request.
Do you by chance know which conditions would qualify for “Sanatio in Radice”? I have never heard of this!
Thanks -
Karen Anne
 
Karen Anne:
Do you by chance know which conditions would qualify for “Sanatio in Radice”? I have never heard of this!
The conditions get a little bit technical. If you would describe why your marriage is considered invalid, it would help. If you would rather research this on your own, you can take a look at:

Canon Law (see canons 1161-1165)

Catholic Encyclopedia article on “Validation of Marriage” (This is out-of-date in that bishops now have the general authority to do this.)

in the Archdiocese of KingstonSanatio in Radice
 
40.png
Catholic2003:
The conditions get a little bit technical. If you would describe why your marriage is considered invalid, it would help. If you would rather research this on your own, you can take a look at:

Canon Law (see canons 1161-1165)

Catholic Encyclopedia article on “Validation of Marriage” (This is out-of-date in that bishops now have the general authority to do this.)

Application Form for Sanatio in Radice in the Archdiocese of Kingston
My first marriage was when I was young and lasted all of 6 weeks. He was a violent man who had been married and divorced several times before we were married (here is a shock - we were married in a “chapel” in Las Vegas - no lectures needed here!). I have never heard from him since and would have no way to contact him for an annulment. Even if I could contact him, I would not do so - the man was a stalker and I have a family to protect now. Also, due to the briefness of the marriage and the fact that we lived nowhere near anyone who knew me I would have no witnesses for the Tribunal… My second marriage ended when my husband died, so there is no question of annulment there. My third marriage (and the one that is truly the BEST) is to a man who has no connection with any church, yet is supportive of my choices but is not interested in participating in a ceremony (does not want to appear hypocritical due to his beliefs). The bottom line is that I want to do what is necessary to come back into communion with the church and have received quite a variety of answers about what I need to do to accomplish this.
Karen Anne
 
Any Marriage not entered into freely and intentionally by both persons is invalid.
 
Br. Rich SFO:
Any Marriage not entered into freely and intentionally by both persons is invalid.
Would you please clarify how this affects my situation?
Thanks!
Karen Anne
 
Karen Anne:
The bottom line is that I want to do what is necessary to come back into communion with the church and have received quite a variety of answers about what I need to do to accomplish this.
Just a few more questions, if you don’t mind:

Were you baptized as a Catholic prior to your first marriage?

If so, had you formally joined any other religion or Christian denomination (or in any other way defected from the Catholic Church by a formal act) prior to your first marriage?

Does your current husband have any prior marriages?

The last question is the big one.
 
40.png
Catholic2003:
Just a few more questions, if you don’t mind:

Were you baptized as a Catholic prior to your first marriage?

If so, had you formally joined any other religion or Christian denomination (or in any other way defected from the Catholic Church by a formal act) prior to your first marriage?

Does your current husband have any prior marriages?

The last question is the big one.
YES - I was baptised as an infant - First Holy Communion when I was 15 - never confirmed.

YES - I “joined” a Southern Baptist church when I was 12 so that I could be a part of the youth group. This was discussed with my parish priest prior to receiving my First Holy Communion (at 15)

NO - My current husband has never been married (says he would never want to be married to anyone but me ~smile~)
 
Karen Anne:
YES - I was baptised as an infant - First Holy Communion when I was 15 - never confirmed.

YES - I “joined” a Southern Baptist church when I was 12 so that I could be a part of the youth group. This was discussed with my parish priest prior to receiving my First Holy Communion (at 15)
I’m a little unclear on the particulars here (e.g., were you rebaptized in the Baptist church, how old were you at your first marriage), but it looks very likely that you qualify for a “lack of canonical form” annulment for your first marriage. That is, you were considered to be Catholic at the time, but you did not marry in the Catholic Church. For this kind of annulment, your ex need not be contacted. All you need is a copy of your marriage license (to prove you didn’t marry in the Catholic Church), a copy of your final divorce decree, and a recent copy of your sacramental record (to prove that you did not receive a dispensation to marry in a Las Vegas chapel). The paperwork should go through in a few weeks to a month.
Karen Anne:
NO - My current husband has never been married (says he would never want to be married to anyone but me ~smile~)
Excellent! In this case, the next step would be to apply for the Sanatio in Radice as described above. After that, you need to go to Confession, and you are back in the good graces of the Catholic Church, able to receive Holy Communion.

After that, going on to get confirmed would be an excellent idea!
 
40.png
Catholic2003:
I’m a little unclear on the particulars here (e.g., were you rebaptized in the Baptist church, how old were you at your first marriage), but it looks very likely that you qualify for a “lack of canonical form” annulment for your first marriage. That is, you were considered to be Catholic at the time, but you did not marry in the Catholic Church. For this kind of annulment, your ex need not be contacted. All you need is a copy of your marriage license (to prove you didn’t marry in the Catholic Church), a copy of your final divorce decree, and a recent copy of your sacramental record (to prove that you did not receive a dispensation to marry in a Las Vegas chapel). The paperwork should go through in a few weeks to a month.

Excellent! In this case, the next step would be to apply for the Sanatio in Radice as described above. After that, you need to go to Confession, and you are back in the good graces of the Catholic Church, able to receive Holy Communion.

After that, going on to get confirmed would be an excellent idea!
Thank you so much for your reply! I now need to figure out how to get a hold of the records you mentioned. Seriously, after 20 years I could not even tell you WHERE we were married in LV , let alone know how to get a hold of the license (I cannot even remember the date - seriously). As far as my current Sacramental Record, how would Igo about that? I live in a very rural area and do not even have a local parish that I am able to attend. We are hoping to move into “civilization” within the year…Would I contact the parish where I had my First Holy Communion?

Karen Anne
 
Karen Anne:
Thank you so much for your reply!
You’re very welcome!
Karen Anne:
I now need to figure out how to get a hold of the records you mentioned. Seriously, after 20 years I could not even tell you WHERE we were married in LV , let alone know how to get a hold of the license (I cannot even remember the date - seriously).
I had that problem as well for my annulment. In my case, I had to try both the city and the county that the city was in. Just keep trying until you find it.

Your final divorce decree should have the date of the marriage somewhere in the first few paragraphs.
Karen Anne:
Would I contact the parish where I had my First Holy Communion?
It’s usually at the parish where you were baptized. Good luck!
 
I was baptised at a parish in a different city than my First Holy Communion. I DO have original copies of my FHC and Baptism - is that what would be needed?

Karen Anne
 
Karen Anne:
I was baptised at a parish in a different city than my First Holy Communion. I DO have original copies of my FHC and Baptism - is that what would be needed?
Not really. You need a copy issued within the last six months. If you bring in the original copies, the tribunal should be able to use that information to figure out where to send away for a current copy.
 
Taken from new website www.inthespiritofcana.org

2.6.9 Convalidation (Re-Validation/“Blessing the Marriage”)
****

There’s no right word for this phenomenon. Sometimes it’s called a convalidation; sometimes a revalidation; and couples usually call it “getting their marriage blessed.”

Most commonly, the situation is that a couple has entered into a civil union, and they now wish to exchange consent in the Church. Canonically, the Church does not recognize their prior exchange of consent, but there is some sort of commitment which they made to each other, and some sort of moral responsibilities which flow from that commitment.

Since according to the Church the couple is exchanging consent for the first time, all of the requirements for entering the Sacrament of Matrimony must be fulfilled. The couple must exchange consent anew (and not simply renew consent that was previously given), and they must have the proper knowledge, intention, and capacity for doing so.

For those raised in the Catholic Church, there may be an understanding that their “real” marriage is the one that takes place in the Church. For non-Catholics (whose churches require no particular form for marriage), the requirement for a new act of consent may not be obvious. In either case, the pastoral minister should explain this in detail.

If the other party does not see a need to give their consent again, and is adamant that their former consent was good enough, then it might be better to seek a sanatio in radice, rather than try to convalidate the marriage. (A sanatio in radice is a retroactive convalidation of the marriage, which does not require a new act of consent.) If this seems the preferable way to handle the situation, contact the Office for Canonical Services to obtain details about this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top