I
Inquiringperson
Guest
Just Wondering.
Well, thereās not someone checking each personās ID as they enter the confessional, so thereās nothing to stop a Mormon (or a person of any other faith, or lack thereof) from entering the confessional and talking with the priest. But a Mormon could not receive the sacramental absolution that is available to Catholics.Just Wondering.![]()
Really?? I never knew that.It is possible for a (validly) baptized non-Catholic to receive the sacrament of Reconciliation if they meet the requirements specified in canon law.
Those Christians who were validly baptized before, and who entered into the Church at Easter Vigil made their first confessions in the days prior to their confirmation and first communion. It was essential for them to receive absolution of any mortal sins before they received communion, just as it is for all of usReally?? I never knew that.
In general, though, the requirements are pretty restrictive. Itās not like a non-Catholic Christian can just be walking down the street, see a Catholic parish and say, āIām gonna go to confessionā and it would be licitā¦Really?? I never knew that.
There are extremely limited situations (ex. imminent death) where non-Catholic Christians can receive grace from going to confession.It is possible for a (validly) baptized non-Catholic to receive the sacrament of Reconciliation if they meet the requirements specified in canon law.
Those are not the canons to which I refer.The expression āthe faithfulā means Catholics.
First these are talking about extreme and rare circumstances and secondly it is about Christians only.Those are not the canons to which I refer.
Can.* 844 §1. Catholic ministers administer the sacraments licitly to Catholic members of the Christian faithful alone, who likewise receive them licitly from Catholic ministers alone, without prejudice to the prescripts of §§2, 3, and 4 of this canon, and ā can. 861, §2.
§2. Whenever necessity requires it or true spiritual advantage suggests it, and provided that danger of error or of indifferentism is avoided, the Christian faithful for whom it is physically or morally impossible to approach a Catholic minister are permitted to receive the sacraments of penance, Eucharist, and anointing of the sick from non-Catholic ministers in whose Churches these sacraments are valid.
§3. Catholic ministers administer the sacraments of penance, Eucharist, and anointing of the sick licitly to members of Eastern Churches which do not have full communion with the Catholic Church if they seek such on their own accord and are properly disposed. This is also valid for members of other Churches which in the judgment of the Apostolic See are in the same condition in regard to the sacraments as these Eastern Churches.
§4. If the danger of death is present or if, in the judgment of the diocesan bishop or conference of bishops, some other grave necessity urges it, Catholic ministers administer these same sacraments licitly also to other Christians not having full communion with the Catholic Church, who cannot approach a minister of their own community and who seek such on their own accord, provided that they manifest Catholic faith in respect to these sacraments and are properly disposed.
§5. For the cases mentioned in §§2, 3, and 4, the diocesan bishop or conference of bishops is not to issue general norms except after consultation at least with the local competent authority of the interested non-Catholic Church or community.
First, these are talking about extreme and rare circumstances and secondly it is about Christians only.Those are not the canons to which I refer.
Can.* 844 §1. Catholic ministers administer the sacraments licitly to Catholic members of the Christian faithful alone, who likewise receive them licitly from Catholic ministers alone, without prejudice to the prescripts of §§2, 3, and 4 of this canon, and ā can. 861, §2.
§2. Whenever necessity requires it or true spiritual advantage suggests it, and provided that danger of error or of indifferentism is avoided, the Christian faithful for whom it is physically or morally impossible to approach a Catholic minister are permitted to receive the sacraments of penance, Eucharist, and anointing of the sick from non-Catholic ministers in whose Churches these sacraments are valid.
§3. Catholic ministers administer the sacraments of penance, Eucharist, and anointing of the sick licitly to members of Eastern Churches which do not have full communion with the Catholic Church if they seek such on their own accord and are properly disposed. This is also valid for members of other Churches which in the judgment of the Apostolic See are in the same condition in regard to the sacraments as these Eastern Churches.
§4. If the danger of death is present or if, in the judgment of the diocesan bishop or conference of bishops, some other grave necessity urges it, Catholic ministers administer these same sacraments licitly also to other Christians not having full communion with the Catholic Church, who cannot approach a minister of their own community and who seek such on their own accord, provided that they manifest Catholic faith in respect to these sacraments and are properly disposed.
§5. For the cases mentioned in §§2, 3, and 4, the diocesan bishop or conference of bishops is not to issue general norms except after consultation at least with the local competent authority of the interested non-Catholic Church or community.
I am not sure why you are posting this to me. See my post #4.First these are talking about extreme and rare circumstances and secondly it is about Christians only.
Mormons are not Christians.
Its a response to your post #11 ref the other canons.I am not sure why you are posting this to me. See my post #4.