M
mel67700
Guest
In addition, do both parent’s have to consent?
I have seen this in previous threads, where a Catholic grandparent/aunt/uncle would want to take a non-bapized infant and have them baptized Catholic against the parent’s wishes. Is this the case the OP’s is thinking of?I wouldn’t think so. If you are not Catholic and are not going to bring up your baby Catholic why would you anyway?
Can. 868 §1. For an infant to be baptized licitly:
1/ the parents or at least one of them or the person who legitimately takes their place must consent;
Normally, these criteria should be satisfied before baptizing the baby.2/ there must be a founded hope that the infant will be brought up in the Catholic religion; if such hope is altogether lacking, the baptism is to be delayed according to the prescripts of particular law after the parents have been advised about the reason.
So only one parent needs to consent? Does that mean that if the other parent is indifferent (and doesn’t even attend) the baptism can proceed? What about if the other parent explicitly dissents?From the Code of Canon Law:
Normally, these criteria should be satisfied before baptizing the baby.
Wishes of the Catholic parent who wants baptism trump those of the one who doesn’t want baptism.So only one parent needs to consent? Does that mean that if the other parent is indifferent (and doesn’t even attend) the baptism can proceed? What about if the other parent explicitly dissents?
You only quoted half of the canon. The other half is:From the Code of Canon Law: