T
tafan
Guest
Ok, Fr. I stand corrected. Although when I went to St Peter’s I could certainly not see the priest and I assumed he could not see me. The other confessionals all appeared the same way,
What you wrote is still wrong. It is not always an option for a penitent seeking the sacrament of penance to “ALWAYS” [your word, your emphasis] receive it behind some form of screen.you know, I didn’t say the penitent had open ended options.
I responded to their question regarding confession behind the screen. That is always their option.
UGH.
Here is a good photo of one of the confessionals in the basilica with the screen visible beside Pope Francis. The best English word I can come up with is that the fixed grate is like a metal mesh…rather like strainers used in cooking…we can see through it, if we look through it.Ok, Fr. I stand corrected. Although when I went to St Peter’s I could certainly not see the priest and I assumed he could not see me. The other confessionals all appeared the same way,
The original purpose of the grate was to physically separate the priest and the penitent. If you look at old artist depictions of confessions, you often see a lot of physical contact between the two participants. I have read that sometimes they would hold hands or hug!Dr. Don Ruggero, You say that the grate is not about anonymity, what is its purpose?
It served as a fixed barrier between the confessor and the penitent; it kept them physically separated.Dr. Don Ruggero, You say that the grate is not about anonymity, what is its purpose?
SOME people are uncomfortable. Many many are not. It has been years since I have not confessed face to face, when I myself receive the sacrament. It is certainly not the practice of the Churches in the East to have screens and such.Why do people have such a big problem with face-to-face confession? Because we do, its uncomfortable. Sorry, but that’s the way it is.
Are you a priest? How do you presume to say the ratio of how many voices I am able to recognise, above all in places where I have served for years? That aside, the priest should not indicate he knows who the person is, unless the penitent makes clear that s/he intends him to know…such as, “Father, this is [Name]” That does not mean we do not recognise the voices of penitents.Do priests know everyone’s voice? THey know a few people, the vast majority of the penitents they do not recognize the voices with any certainty.
These priests should be reported to the Bishop of the diocese in which they are hearing confessions, as well as the Vicar of Clergy or, if in Europe, the Canon Penitentiary so that appropriate action can be taken against them.I know several priests who normally will not do face-to-face confessions. They dislike the fact that some people expect it. Do you really think priests want to always know who did what? I consider face-to-face confessions a bad modern convention. Not fair to the priests or the penitents.
Why should they be reported? There is no obligation for the priest to hear face-to-face confession. That was clarified by a dubium as I recall. AAS, XC, 1998, p. 711Don Ruggero;14526711:Code:I know several priests who normally will not do face-to-face confessions. They dislike the fact that some people expect it. Do you really think priests want to always know who did what? I consider face-to-face confessions a bad modern convention. Not fair to the priests or the penitents.
These priests should be reported to the Bishop of the diocese in which they are hearing confessions, as well as the Vicar of Clergy or, if in Europe, the Canon Penitentiary so that appropriate action can be taken against them.
Fortunately, the Holy See and the world’s bishops totally disagree with you on face to face confession being a bad convention. And theirs is the only decision that matters, in the end.
I have had occasion in my travels to occupy reconciliation rooms, with a glass door. I very much liked them.When I was a kid in the 60’s, the confessionals were much like the photos shown, with grilles between the Priest and the confessor, and the Priest sitting in a confessional.
Today there is a reconcilliation room with an option of sitting face to face or kneeling behind a curtain that is see through. The room has a big glass door, so there is not much privacy.
Because of Case 50, the confessionals were removed.
Actually, no. A priest cannot require all confessions to take place behind a fixed grill. That simply is not possible or feasible. It was also impossible prior to the Council.Be sure to complete that sentence – The penitent does not always have (open ended) options!
In a converse of the OP question, a confessor can require all confessions to take place behind a fixed grille*. A penitent may only opt to confess face to face it the confessor first offers that choice.
(* Insert standard admonition that fixed grilles have nothing to do with anonymity, per se)
tee
Insert standard not-a-canon-lawyer disclaimer
OK, can we say that if a confessional is available the priest cannot be compelled to hear confessions face-to-face?Actually, no. A priest cannot require all confessions to take place behind a fixed grill. That simply is not possible or feasible. It was also impossible prior to the Council.
I had occasion to lecture on this particular dubium, actually, and its practical applications.Why should they be reported? There is no obligation for the priest to hear face-to-face confession. That was clarified by a dubium as I recall. AAS, XC, 1998, p. 711
We can say that if a confessional is truly and really available to the priest and is both accessible to and usable by the penitent, the priest can insist on it being used.OK, can we say that if a confessional is available the priest cannot be compelled to hear confessions face-to-face?
I am not a priest, it is what I have been told by a priest. One who knew me pretty well told me he would not be sure if it was I behind the screen.Are you a priest? How do you presume to say the ratio of how many voices I am able to recognise, above all in places where I have served for years? That aside, the priest should not indicate he knows who the person is, unless the penitent makes clear that s/he intends him to know…such as, “Father, this is [Name]” That does not mean we do not recognise the voices of penitents.
I said they will not normally do face-to-face confessions. I admit I overstated this. I have seen them in a retreat setting on multiple occasions, and they have set up a “temporary confessional” and it only allows for confessions behind the screen. My assumption is that this the way they prefer to hear confessions. One has told me so. Another priest told me he wished confessionals were still made that did not allow face-to-face.These priests should be reported to the Bishop of the diocese in which they are hearing confessions, as well as the Vicar of Clergy or, if in Europe, the Canon Penitentiary so that appropriate action can be taken against them.
And of course, I am obviously wrong as illustrated by the drastically increased use of the sacrament the last 40 years by the average lay person.Fortunately, the Holy See and the world’s bishops totally disagree with you on face to face confession being a bad convention. And theirs is the only decision that matters, in the end
It also seems to foster a little community. Everyone lines up outside the room waiting their turn, on pews. We chat quietly or pray. If someone goes in, or comes out upset, its quite a supportive environment.I have had occasion in my travels to occupy reconciliation rooms, with a glass door. I very much liked them.