B
BILL_PICK53
Guest
Can some one please tell me what verse in the Bible we are to take as a Symol and what one we are to take figrative,Chapter and verse please
**The Letter speaks of deeds; Allegory to faith;
The Moral how to act; Anagogy our destiny.**87
**But I would not believe in the Gospel, had not the authority of the Catholic Church already moved me.89 (89 St. Augustine, Contra epistolam Manichaei, 5,6:PL 42,176)**
I believe what Bill is asking is from his other thread “I just must ask” post 101, when I asked this question: " Don’t Catholics take the Bible literally?"Hmmm…? I’m not sure I understand your question correctly. In any case, it sounds like you may want to get a “Biblical Commentary”. I like the “New Jerome Biblical Commentary”, although I do need to keep a dictionary handy! If you search the threads here I’m sure you’ll find some other recommendations.
I don’t think it would be practical (let alone, authoritative) to go through the Holy Bible chapter and verse saying “this is literal”, “this is allegoric”, “this is symbolic” etc. on a forum such as this.
I don’t know if this answers your question but I hope it helps.
God bless!
A good study Bible like the NKJV study Bible with the complete nelson study system is a good one to start with. But lets say you do not have one of those. If you look at a particular verse, lets say in the book of Revelation and it says something is “like” something else then you cannot take that verse literally. Take Revelation 9:Can some one please tell me what verse in the Bible we are to take as a Symol and what one we are to take figrative,Chapter and verse please
Notice how many times the word “like” appears in these verses. John could only describe these “creatures” in ways that they looked familiar to him. Take for example if you were to take George Washington forward in time and ask him to describe a plasma TV, how do you think he would do it? He would probably use words like, “It is like a painting where the picture moves and talks like the person is in the room.”7 The shape of the locusts was like horses prepared for battle. On their heads were crowns of something like gold, and their faces were like the faces of men. 8 They had hair like women’s hair, and their teeth were like lions’ teeth. 9 And they had breastplates like breastplates of iron, and the sound of their wings was like the sound of chariots with many horses running into battle. 10 They had tails like scorpions, and there were stings in their tails. Their power was to hurt men five months.
Even though Jesus is using a figurative type of language we know we can take this in a literal sense.25 Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in Me, though he may die, he shall live. 26 And whoever lives and believes in Me shall never die. Do you believe this?”
OK here we have a statement of fact that is backed up by eye witnesses. Mark’s Gospel goes further than Matthew and Luke in mentioning that Simon was “the father of Alexander and Rufus.” Why is that tidbit important? because in the Book of acts you find these two names again as leaders in the first century church, so something must have changed their father and them that day.21 Then they compelled a certain man, Simon a Cyrenian, the father of Alexander and Rufus, as he was coming out of the country and passing by, to bear His cross.