I call that super grace since believer acts because of the gifts or punishment but nonbeliever acts because of act only.
I know this is from way back on the first page, but this went unaddressed and I think it needs an answer.
The distinction between natural and supernatural is one that is extremely neglected in our day, we have to recover it. A believer in God will increasingly act in a way that pleases God, because it is just and without thought for “gifts and punishment”. Such motivations are typical when our relationship with God is very new, but they give way to serving God for His own sake.
To say that it is “super grace” for a nonbeliever to do good acts without reference to God is inaccurate on at several levels, two of which I shall elucidate.
First, grace is not something that we ourselves generate. If the nonbeliever does not have a relationship with God, then no grace is present there. None whatsoever. The nonbeliever could perform outrageously heroic acts, but if the person performing them does not have sanctifying grace, then his acts are entirely without merit in God’s eyes. They are purely natural acts, and good as such. But if they are not united to God’s life through grace, then it is as though God doesn’t even “see” them, so to speak.
Secondly, it is very difficult to understand your meaning when you infer that an act has greater merit when the person performing it does not take God into account than an act where the God is taken into account. How could such a thing possibly be?