In my lifetime, I have seen teachings of the Church, doctrines, dogmas, traditions, held by the Church, changed. It happens often. I don’t see how anyone can say categorically, a teaching cannot be changed. The words of Christ, no, infallibly proclaimed dogma/doctrine, no. But teachings, yes, definitely.
Case in point. In my youth it was a teaching of the church that suicide was a mortal sin. That a person who committed suicide could not be given a burial mass service, no be interred in sacred ground. That has been changed.
Hi, Joe!
Error in judgment does not mean the same as erring for the sake of sensibilities.
What you’ve cited is the wrong teaching of the Church based on what was known. Once the Church understood, as mental health experts made possible, that diminished capacity could cause some to commit suicide she relaxed her teachings on what as formerly held; yet, the Church does not teach blanket suicide (meaning, if some decides to kill him/herself because they lost a loved one, pet, job, wealth, security, health…); moral judgment still goes.
Reducing adultery to ‘well, Jesus didn’t really want people to be shun,’ well that’s just not Biblical… He actually told people to their faces, ‘depart from Me evil doers.’ (St. Matthew 7:21-23)
Earlier, the teaching that slavery was permissible. And this was found in Scripture, no less. That teaching was changed as it should have been.
Really? The Catholic Church Taught that slavery was ok? Did you missed that episode with the Romans where the Church Taught that it was wrong to keep slaves or that episode with the “New World” where monarchs and regular joes were deemed self-excommunicated if they engaged in slavery?
New and better understandings, be they physical, psychological, etc demand that teachings that are rooted in obsolete understandings must be changed.
I fully concur! Yet, the Church cannot Teach that unrighteousness is ok because more people are engaged in it today than they were before or because society has open its heart, mind, and understanding to the plight of the unrighteousness making all things right to balance the “misunderstandings” of the past.
Sin City is not a stop between Heaven and earth; it’s hollowood’s spirituality.
And one other thing. You cite the debate over communion for people in irregular marriages as is currently being discussed in Amoris Laetitia. **Consider this, nowhere in the four Gospels does Christ say anything about who can and cannot “eat his body, and drink his blood”. In fact, a strict reading leads one to believe that Jesus wants all to do so. **
He makes no reference to who is worthy or unworthy. The interpretation of the Lord’s words have been left up to the apostles and their successors. Like other teachings, throughout history as times have progressed, teachings have been modified, amplified, and improved upon in the life of the Church. I think this just might be the action of the Holy Spirit???
I feel you… but I cannot agree with such understanding… did you know that there are people going on about universalism (everyone regardless of their rejection of God or unrighteousness will be eternally saved–some even argue that Satan too will gain salvation); I think that part of the problem is that when they read Sacred Scriptures they form fantastic eisegesis from terms that seem to imply that God wants all to be Saved–they simply leave out the part where Scriptures demonstrate that while God in deed wants all to be Saved, it is man’s freewill that must respond to God’s Call and Grace (Deuteronomy 30:19).
As for the Body and Blood… while it is true that Jesus wants all to Receive Him, it is not true that all want and can in deed Receive Him:
23 For I received from the Lord what I also passed on to you: The Lord Jesus, on the night he was betrayed, took bread, 24 and when he had given thanks, he broke it and said, “This is my body, which is for you; do this in remembrance of me.” 25 In the same way, after supper he took the cup, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood; do this, whenever you drink it, in remembrance of me.” 26 For whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes. 27 So then, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the body and blood of the Lord. 28 Everyone ought to examine themselves before they eat of the bread and drink from the cup. 29 For those who eat and drink without discerning the body of Christ eat and drink judgment on themselves.
(1 Corinthians 11:23-29)
So yeah, God wants all to be Saved and Receive His Body and Blood… but no, it is not a “right” that man can claim!
Maran atha!
Angel