Jharek, it is, I feel, a bittersweet aroma.
Anyway, I made a typo in my last post. It should of course, be “correct,” not “incorrect.”
Again, if EWTN had a problem with it, they would have pulled her from their programming.
I do not care what EWTN does with its programming. I also do not inherently care about any message coming from EWTN employees
qua EWTN employees.
It’s sad that Catholics call people “fearmongering” because they want to be right and are unwilling to listen to another point of view.
Jharek has already addressed this. Also, this is a factual issue, not some group therapy session where we all discuss our feelings. Furthermore, the articles you posted are totally absolutist: Yoga, according to them, is incompatible with Catholicism. It is not even like you are suggesting that it is a case-by-case issue.
All three suffer from the same specific problem: they fail to dissociate spiritual and physical yoga, nor do they even prove that such can happen at all.
I will put this in another way. Imagine that I am a 30-year-old housewife. I would like to gain flexibility and begin stretching. I go to a store and buy a yoga DVD. The person telling me what to do is a blonde 35-year-old blonde white woman. At no point during the course of the workout does she mention anything that could possible be construed as supernatural at all.
The articles are utter failures in rhetoric insofar as they do not actually address how the above scenario is problematic. Everyone knows that yoga
can have spiritual connotations. No argument on this thread, or anywhere, I would imagine, is able to adequately state why yoga
must have spiritual connotations. In other words, why the example I posted is problematic.
Would you care to oblige?