Can Christ forgive Lucifer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AlanFromWichita
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Here’s a totally different view I heard. It was from a very well respected, though non-Catholic source.

Everybody likes to talk about Christ sitting at the right hand of the Father. Who sits at the left?

In old courtrooms he said the defender sits to the right hand of the judge and the advocate, or prosecutor, sits to the left.

Nobody would say that there was a fair system of justice without an advocate and a defender, would they?

Therefore justice requires accusation and defense both. Therefore satan tries to divide you, and isolate you to everlasting prison, while Christ tries to set you free and lets you Move On to Purgatory where you will be cleaned up and prepared for His high feast.

The Good News is that satan controls the world, which means the physioligical aspects of the flesh I would imagine, but take heart; Christ has defeated the world. The world may hate us but know that it hated him first.

When people hate you, is it because you accuse somebody or defend somebody? Answer: either. Which, the advocate or the Savior is bringing justice to the world? Answer: both.

Here’s the real rub. God the Father, whether I think of Him as ultimate judge or has given proxy to Christ (and consequently His Church) to defend and propitiate for our sins. Since he has defeated satan, there is no power (examples in Rom 8:35-ish) that satan has worldly control of, including powers, past, future, peril, etc that can separate us from the love of Christ. If we are judged worthy by the judge (Father, Son, Trinity, I don’t know the theological correct words) then the case is dismissed and the advocate has nothing to say.

On earth, we actually need the worldly and the spiritual controls in order to deal with the duality of imperfect humans. The worldly control is the prosecuting attorney, plaintiff, or whatever, and the spiritual control is the defending attorney, claiming that his client should not be punished.

Therefore, when I polled, people told me that to varying degrees, they welcomed both condemnation and praise from both friends and sinners, presumably able to accept that all of them are from humans who are neither good nor bad, but by their nature every message is partly true and partly human.

So I figure the best thing to do with praise is immediately pass if off like a hot potato, making sure you don’t presume to be experts at others’ fields by saying “I loved your pie” rather than “you pie was great” to indicate you were expressing a personal rather than authoritarian opinion. The best thing to do with cursing is to genuinely (not with even a feeling of sarcasm so as not to betray it through subliminal gestures) than the person for their concern, read back to them calmly what you think their specific objection, and affirm their dignity by saying, “hmm I think that’s an interesting point to consider that I’ve not thought through” thus saving face for you both.

[edit] This is how you bless them. What better way to bless them than to consecrate them to the Lord? To do that, treat them like the least of Christ’s brothers, and give them the presumption of innocence as the most valuable gift a human can give another. They thought Christ was a disobedient “cafeteria” Jew whose peopel didn’t wash their hands, He drank himself right there with sinners and let whores was His feet and held them up without even so much as admonishing them. Sounds like Christ plays the defender rather thant the prosecutor. The prosecutor is built into the world by its very nature and into our souls by original sin which separated us to begin with.

Funny thing “cleave” means to separate or to join. We cleave unto our wives since the fall, and depart from our parents. A cleaver separates. Surgery can consist in both cutting, and trating. The Word cuts both ways, as you see people here on this forum using the word to alternately accuse and defend each other. Such is the prophecy that out of the same keyboard we will praise God (in recognizing the love we detect in the least of His brothers) and curse other men (directly, based on surface observations).

Remember saving face is important. Bombard somebody with a Truth Sledghammer and you may win the fight but the opponent may lose something in the conversion!

Alan
 
All that really matters is that when a person says Lucifer, as in “Can God forgive Lucifer,” they are talking about Satan. Someone might say “I can’t believe that idiot from Texas said…” We could argue for days about whether he should be called “idiot from Texas,” but all that matters is that I know they mean Mr. Bush.

As far as Satan being and angel, he is an angel.
Zec 3:1 And the Lord shewed me Jesus the high priest standing before the angel of the Lord: and Satan stood on his right hand to be his adversary. (DRB)
This doesn’t say or imply in any way that Satan is not an angel. It merely identifies him by name. If I said, “and I saw Ed the Judge standing next to the lawyer of the plantiff, and Frank stood on his right hand to be his adversary,” It doesn’t mean Frank isn’t a lawyer, I’m just identifying him by name. (And just to clarify, it should say “Joshua the High Priest,” not Jesus).
2Co 11:14 And no wonder: for Satan himself transformeth himself into an angel of light. (DRB)
There’s nothing here either that says Satan is not an angel. It merely says he transforms himself into an “angel of light.” The context here is that false prophets will present themselves as true Apostles. To do this, St. Paul is giving the example of Satan presenting himself as an angel of light. The idea is one of Satan being deceptive by making himself off to be an angel from God when he is not. If you want a simpler way to look at it, just realize that Satan could be an angel of darkness who is pretending to be an angel of light.
2Co 12:7 And lest the greatness of the revelations should exalt me, there was given me a sting of my flesh, an angel of Satan, to buffet me. (DRB)
This fits perfectly with the teaching that Satan and a number of other angels rebelled and that Satan was their ruler. Your own analysis proves the point: “serpent, dragon, Leviathan, Rahab.” Which is he? None. These are all either symbolic prophecies, like Revelation, or Satan manifesting himself as one of these. Remeber that angels don’t have bodies but are pure spirit (some would say pure will, or pure thought). They can manifest themselves in physical ways, which fits with Satan appearing as different things, such as a serpent and a Leviathan.
Job 1:6 Now on a certain day, when the sons of God came to stand before the Lord, Satan also was present among them.(DRB)
Satan was not present in addition to them, as you say, but was present among them. He was one of them. Again, if I say, “The senators came to stand before the President, and Ted Kennedy was also present among them,” it doesn’t mean Ted Kennedy isn’t a Senator, it just serves to make clear he was there.
 
40.png
AlanFromWichita:
Has the timer run out on Lucifer?

Wasn’t he once good? If so, then is he irreparably evil?

What if he made an act of perfect contrition to Jesus? Could he be saved?

I’m sorry if this is a rehash of an old thread. I’m not so interested in finding the answer as I am in asking the question, so I don’t expect anything in particular for responses.

Alan

Angels are metaphysically simple - not (as we are) composites (in our case, of body and soul).​

This simplicity of theirs, is something in which they resemble God - the vital difference is, that angels are created: and God alone can bridge the infinite distance between creatureliness, and being the Creator. The angels can’t, just as we can’t - and in that, they are on a par with us.

As they are simple, their activity is simple - their knowing, loving, and so on: what they do, and the mode in which they do it, is a consequence of what sort of being they are. The same holds for us - but as we are composite (& fallen, of course), our activity is manifold, and successive, and laborious. So we acquire knowledge not all at once, but bit by bit, piecemeal, through a multiplicity of concepts. This is because, although our souls are purely spiritual - just as the angels are purely spiritual - our souls are united with bodies: and are meant to be; to be a man is to be, not a body-free soul, but a unity consisting of body & soul together. Which is why death is unnatural.

IOW - angelic activity is immediate, free of the need for second thoughts (unlike ours). So if an angel sins, that is it. They cannot repent, because they are either totally and unreservedly for God, and wholly receptive of God - or totally & unreservedly unreceptive of God, so far as in them lies.

They have only one reason to exist - to love God; to fail in that, is to fail comprehensively and totally, and finally. And to turn willingly from God, and to self without God, is to live a lie - it is a fundamental distortion of their very being, a poisoning of the well-springs of their existence. For them to sin, is to be so radically wounded, that they cannot recover.

Things are real insofaras they resemble God. Sin does not resemble God, for God does not possess, but is, infinite Being; and sin, has no being at all - it is a relation, not being which can have a relation to other beings. So to turn, willingly and freely, from God to sin, and to choose to do so with the totality of one’s being, is to do something analogous to committing suicide; only far more thoroughly. Angels can’t destroy themselves, or unsay the word which created them - but for them to sin, is a pretty fair second-best to doing so.

A man is less excellent than an angel, but far excels an apple in glory and honour, & most of all in the end for which he has been created: which is, the Beatific Vision. A fallen angel is far below an apple, because an angel has far further to fall: a rotten angel is far worse than a rotten man, who is in turn far worse than a rotten apple, because the worst corruption, is the corruption of what is best. The gravity of sin is in proportion to the Love against which it kicks - the more Loved the creature, & the more rich and varied the ways in which that Love has worked on the creature, the blacker the ingratitude, the greater the sin, and the deeper the damnation. (Which is why it is not a good idea for Catholics to be damned - it will go far harder with us than with others, because our sin will (all things being equal) be far greater :() ##
 
40.png
AlanFromWichita:
Here’s a totally different view I heard. It was from a very well respected, though non-Catholic source.

Everybody likes to talk about Christ sitting at the right hand of the Father. Who sits at the left?

In old courtrooms he said the defender sits to the right hand of the judge and the advocate, or prosecutor, sits to the left.

Nobody would say that there was a fair system of justice without an advocate and a defender, would they?

Therefore justice requires accusation and defense both. Therefore satan tries to divide you, and isolate you to everlasting prison, while Christ tries to set you free and lets you Move On to Purgatory where you will be cleaned up and prepared for His high feast.

The Good News is that satan controls the world, which means the physioligical aspects of the flesh I would imagine, but take heart; Christ has defeated the world. The world may hate us but know that it hated him first.

When people hate you, is it because you accuse somebody or defend somebody? Answer: either. Which, the advocate or the Savior is bringing justice to the world? Answer: both.

Here’s the real rub. God the Father, whether I think of Him as ultimate judge or has given proxy to Christ (and consequently His Church) to defend and propitiate for our sins. Since he has defeated satan, there is no power (examples in Rom 8:35-ish) that satan has worldly control of, including powers, past, future, peril, etc that can separate us from the love of Christ. If we are judged worthy by the judge (Father, Son, Trinity, I don’t know the theological correct words) then the case is dismissed and the advocate has nothing to say.

On earth, we actually need the worldly and the spiritual controls in order to deal with the duality of imperfect humans. The worldly control is the prosecuting attorney, plaintiff, or whatever, and the spiritual control is the defending attorney, claiming that his client should not be punished.

Therefore, when I polled, people told me that to varying degrees, they welcomed both condemnation and praise from both friends and sinners, presumably able to accept that all of them are from humans who are neither good nor bad, but by their nature every message is partly true and partly human.

So I figure the best thing to do with praise is immediately pass if off like a hot potato, making sure you don’t presume to be experts at others’ fields by saying “I loved your pie” rather than “you pie was great” to indicate you were expressing a personal rather than authoritarian opinion. The best thing to do with cursing is to genuinely (not with even a feeling of sarcasm so as not to betray it through subliminal gestures) than the person for their concern, read back to them calmly what you think their specific objection, and affirm their dignity by saying, “hmm I think that’s an interesting point to consider that I’ve not thought through” thus saving face for you both.

[edit] This is how you bless them. What better way to bless them than to consecrate them to the Lord? To do that, treat them like the least of Christ’s brothers, and give them the presumption of innocence as the most valuable gift a human can give another. They thought Christ was a disobedient “cafeteria” Jew whose peopel didn’t wash their hands, He drank himself right there with sinners and let whores was His feet and held them up without even so much as admonishing them. Sounds like Christ plays the defender rather thant the prosecutor. The prosecutor is built into the world by its very nature and into our souls by original sin which separated us to begin with.

Funny thing “cleave” means to separate or to join. We cleave unto our wives since the fall, and depart from our parents. A cleaver separates. Surgery can consist in both cutting, and trating. The Word cuts both ways, as you see people here on this forum using the word to alternately accuse and defend each other. Such is the prophecy that out of the same keyboard we will praise God (in recognizing the love we detect in the least of His brothers) and curse other men (directly, based on surface observations).

Remember saving face is important. Bombard somebody with a Truth Sledghammer and you may win the fight but the opponent may lose something in the conversion!

Alan
I just very quickly read through that, but it seems rather gnostic.
 
All lot of that went over my head.

Does that mean that Christ can’t forgive Lucifer because he is an angel and the forgiveness thing works differently with them? :confused:

I guess if that’s the case then this question really isn’t very interesting. :eek:

Alan
 
I’ll try to write a really simple version 🙂

Basically, as humans we live here on earth and only know a little bit about God. We also only have wills that are so strong, and we can give in to our weaknesses.

When a human being sins, its because of one of two reasons. One reason is that he gives into his weakness. The other reason is that he is behaving based on what he thinks he knows, when the truth is really different.

Angels have perfect will. They don’t have weakness, so they can’t sin that way. They also know everything there is to, so they can only behave based on the truth.

Because of these two things, when Satan rebelled against God, he did it once and for all. He had perfect will, so he did exactly what he wanted to and there was no weakness. This means he wanted 100% to go against God. He also had perfect complete knowledge, which means that he can never know anything more about God than what he does now.

When a human changes his mind, its always because of some new info, even if its some minor small fact. Satan can never have any new info, no matter how small, so he can never change his mind. He made his choice knowing the 100% truth, and he did it because he hated the 100% truth. Because of this, he can’t repent. That would mean he’d have to change his mind, and he will never have a reason to change his mind. He also can’t just decide he likes things better the other way and change his mind because of that. When a person does this he is giving in to something, whether its outside influence or his own doubts or something like that. Satan has perfect will, so he can never give in to anything like that either.
 
40.png
AlanFromWichita:
All lot of that went over my head.

Does that mean that Christ can’t forgive Lucifer because he is an angel and the forgiveness thing works differently with them? :confused:

I guess if that’s the case then this question really isn’t very interesting. :eek:

Alan
Sorry Alan, but it really does come down to the fact that humans and angels are different. Wish we could offer you something more, but that’s the end of it.

Your description of heaven, and the prosecutor and defender is interesting, but not anything that conforms to any Catholic teaching I know of.

CARose
 
40.png
CARose:
Sorry Alan, but it really does come down to the fact that humans and angels are different. Wish we could offer you something more, but that’s the end of it.

Your description of heaven, and the prosecutor and defender is interesting, but not anything that conforms to any Catholic teaching I know of.

CARose
Cool. Oh well, it was fun while it lasted.

Thanks, all, for the interesting contributions! :clapping:

Alan
 
Christ forgive anyone who repents!!! Lucifer does not want forgiveness,he never repented of his sin,and he never will.:hmmm:
 
40.png
Lazerlike42:
I’ll try to write a really simple version 🙂

Basically, as humans we live here on earth and only know a little bit about God. We also only have wills that are so strong, and we can give in to our weaknesses.

When a human being sins, its because of one of two reasons. One reason is that he gives into his weakness. The other reason is that he is behaving based on what he thinks he knows, when the truth is really different.

Angels have perfect will. They don’t have weakness, so they can’t sin that way. They also know everything there is to, so they can only behave based on the truth.

Because of these two things, when Satan rebelled against God, he did it once and for all. He had perfect will, so he did exactly what he wanted to and there was no weakness. This means he wanted 100% to go against God. He also had perfect complete knowledge, which means that he can never know anything more about God than what he does now.

When a human changes his mind, its always because of some new info, even if its some minor small fact. Satan can never have any new info, no matter how small, so he can never change his mind. He made his choice knowing the 100% truth, and he did it because he hated the 100% truth. Because of this, he can’t repent. That would mean he’d have to change his mind, and he will never have a reason to change his mind. He also can’t just decide he likes things better the other way and change his mind because of that. When a person does this he is giving in to something, whether its outside influence or his own doubts or something like that. Satan has perfect will, so he can never give in to anything like that either.

Thanks - maybe I should get out more 🙂 One quibble: even angels aren’t all-knowing; an angel’s act of knowing is an exercise of all that an angel is, so their knowledge can’t be increased. IOW - they are totally committed in the whole of their being to whatever they do. Ergo: no possibility of second thoughts or change - or of the changes we know as “conversion” & “repentance”.​

As the fortunate owner of a book with the title “Satan”, I was doing little more than reproduce what a Dominican contributor to it - Father Walter Farrell, O.P. - had written.

Angels are basically as near to God by their nature as creatures can be - so satan is (almost) a ruined god. Since God has “invented” a way of being close to Him which is not based on what something is by its nature, nearness to God by grace is also possible. Which is why the least saint is closer to God than the devil is; for saints and God are united by the life of grace. ##
 
quote: Sherlock
If you’re not interested in finding an answer (provided the question asked has an answer), why ask the question? This reminds me of people who say they’d rather “be on the journey” then reach the destination. Truth, if approached that way, will never be found. A good Chesterton quote that addresses this vague relativistic mindset is hovering, but I’ll have to go search for it…
“The heart has reasons, which reason knoweth not.”
So much for the “logical” approach, IMHO.😃

To me, the “logical” approach
“…vague relativistic mindset”
reminds me of nothing so much as
a train confined to the tracks, as opposed to the “mulling
mindset” which I myself treasure…more like a loveley
bike trip, rather than stuck on the rails of logic, with the
limited scenery that mode offers.

Ah, if only the world fitted the template offered by
Chesterton. I mean, it’s so…logical.

reen12
 
40.png
reen12:
Ah, if only the world fitted the template offered by
Chesterton. I mean, it’s so…logical.
Dear Maureen,

Last night I just heard a really great lecture about G.K. Chesterton, by Alan Watts, a philosopher who credits Chesterton with influencing him greatly.

No wonder so many people like Chesterton, but for some reason I haven’t really recognized that GKC’s ideas as Watts described in the lecture are truly embraced.

Either Watts is misrepresenting Chesterton (which is unlikely IMO regardless of his being non-Catholic) or maybe his words are misapplied.

It’s an mp3 file, about 29M, lasts 41minutes. If you want it, let me know and I will post it somewhere you can get to it to download or PM me and I will send you audio or data CD. I would upload it now but I’m in my wife’s apartment now where I don’t have my preferred upload program.

Alan
 
Hi, Alan,

I’m glad that you have kind words for Chesterton.

I read the Father Brown stories, and, while well written,
I came away thinking: never one word when five will do.
I’ve tried three times to read The Everlasting Man, and
I’m asleep by page 6.
I keep wanting to “say” to Chesterton, “Get to the* point*,
man!” The descriptive “bloviate” leaps to mind.

The irony in all of this, is that I am a logician by* nature*,
as well as training. I understand the mindset, because
I’ve lived with same all these decades.

One of my pet peeves is trying to trump the heart with
the head…and offering a myriad of “reasons” why this
“trumping” should be encouraged [see the Chesterton
quote, above.]

I dunno. While my mind howls with distress when I
come across the* truly* illogical, still, sometimes logic is…“illogical.”

I’m open to changing my mind on Chesterton, so if
you’d be kind enough to give me a link, I’ll listen to
what Watts has to offer on the topic.

All the best to you, Alan,
Maureen
PS: Perhaps devotees of haiku* would* find Chesterton
unendurable.😃
 
I always welcome the wisdom of the CCC in these discussions. I find it incredible that we have yet to come up with a question in our musings and ramblings that has not been addressed by incredibly learned people and set down in the Catechism of the Holy Mother Church. I don’t know about anyone else, but it really gives me spiritual security.

And I agree about Cherterson’s writings - I would rather LISTEN to him than read him…asleep by page 6? You BETCHA.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top