In my travels across America, I don’t think I’ve ever been to a parish that did not have blessings in the Communion line. I think I’ll take some of these documents to my priest and see if he can shed some light on this.
I gave my parochial vicar and my pastor copies of the CDWDS document. My parochial vicar was quite happy. In fact, two weeks ago, I assisted him in distributing Holy Communion. We just happened to get non-communion aged kids at the same time and we both gave Holy Communion to the parents (although the kids had their arms crossed). We got funny looks, but continued. I also forwarded the document to the new administrator of the Cathedral and another priest friend of mine. Both have also stopped. In fact, the latter, unfortunately, berated his deacon for blessing someone in lieu of receiving Holy Communion (not the best approach).
The local monastery also received one of my emails and one of the priest sent me a note back thanking me.
I know that the OP asked the question and it’s been resoundingly answered. However, unfortunately, there remains a lot of confusion as to what an EMHC can and cannot do. All we are commissioned to do is to assist in the distribution of Holy Communion.
Even at that point, the numbers need to justify our usage. That has been the biggest bone of contention between my parochial vicar and myself. My pastor has no qualms about distributing Holy Communion solo during daily Mass (30 communicants at the most). My PV feels the need to have someone help him. He and I have had some knock-down drag downs about this one. What is rather interesting is that he doesn’t need any help at the local hospital chapel when he celebrates Mass (however, when the numbers are great, he will ask the deacon to assist him–perfectly fine since the deacon is the ordniary minister). However, at the parish, he gets to Mass late 99.9% of the time, delivers a 10 minute homily, and then decides that he cannot handle 30 communicants solo so he asks for help. Then, he rushes off for his lunch date, or, to listen to a popular noon-day talk-radio program.
I wrote him a lengthy letter telling him that this was not the best approach and I quoted the documents. We didn’t speak for weeks. But, he did stop. Unfortunately, he has resumed the practice. My pastor and I talked about it and he thought that an EMHC during daily Mass is unnecessary (unless Communion under both species were to be given).
In frustration, I spoke to the new administrator of the Cathedral and he agreed that an EMHC is not needed during daily Mass (unless, both species are distributed, something the Cathedral does during the week). He was at a loss as to why my parochial vicar would do such a thing if he prides himself on being faithful to the documents (celebrating ad orientum twice a week, etc).
I am not against the concept of having an EMHC. I do this at Mass. What concerns me is the fact that we are not used in the proper manner. The Church has given us parameters, but, both the clergy and the EMHCs tend to blur the line. For example, when I handled the Chrism Mass and the other diocesan liturgies, I never requested EMHCs to assist. We had a plethora of priests and deacons. That is
their ordinary ministry. It is something that is
proper to them. Now, for the Chrism Mass, I did have EMHCs assist in filling up the bottles of oil and geting them packaged and ready for distribution. But, this was done in the Sacristy after the oils were blessed and consecrated.
We just need to know our proper roles.