P
PJM
Guest
How does Faith permit required evidence? Can it?
What do you mean by “permit required evidence”?How does Faith permit required evidence? Can it?
Faith is belief without evidence, so your question makes very little sense.How does Faith permit required evidence? Can it?
How does the Catholic Church define “faith”? Is her definition the same as the one you just stated?Faith is belief without evidence, so your question makes very little sense.
We may differ on the definition of evidence. Faith can not insist on anything. It’s only requirement is belief.How does the Catholic Church define “faith”? Is her definition the same as the one you just stated?
FAIR Question=warpspeedpetey;8174791]What do you mean by “permit required evidence”?
Frist of ALL welcome Home my friend:thumbsup:=sw85;8174833]If you mean is it possible to reconcile faith and reason, it is not only possible but mandatory. Faith is simply trusting in what your reason has revealed to be true. The notion that faith is distinct from reason is a voluntarist heresy, and in my experience it’s mostly Protestants that believe it.
=StrawberryJam;8174864]Faith is belief without evidence, so your question makes very little sense.
Not so sure about this. Why would we need faith if reason already revealed something to be true?If you mean is it possible to reconcile faith and reason, it is not only possible but mandatory. Faith is simply trusting in what your reason has revealed to be true. The notion that faith is distinct from reason is a voluntarist heresy, and in my experience it’s mostly Protestants that believe it.
**Heb.11: 1 **“Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen.”=davidv;8174908]How does the Catholic Church define “faith”? Is her definition the same as the one you just stated?
=Jesus_123;8174981]+Christianity . . . as taught by our Holy Mother Church . . . is by no means a “religion” of human reason (ratio) alone . . . or . . . faith (fides) alone . . . at the beginning of Blessed Pope John Paul the Great’s Fides et ratio . . .
IOANNES PAULUS PP. II
FIDES ET RATIO
To the Bishops
of the Catholic Church
on the relationship
between** Faith** and Reason
1998.09.14
is recorded a blessing from our highly esteemed Holy Father . . . the Blessed Pope John Paul the Great . . . which brings into focus . . . **human reason ** . . . and its significance in . . . participating with . . . God . . . in the salvific nature of the Holy Gift of Christian Faith . . .
“Faith and reason are like two wings on which the human spirit rises to the contemplation of TRUTH; and God has placed in the human heart a desire to know the TRUTH—in a word, to know HIMSELF—so that, by knowing and lovingGod, men and women may also come to the fullness of truth about themselves (cf. Ex 33:18; Ps 27:8-9; 63:2-3; Jn 14:8; 1 Jn 3:2).”
Continuing on in Fides et ratio, Chapter 1, Section #9 . . .
"…Based upon God’s testimony and enjoying the supernatural assistance of grace,
- FAITH is of an order
other than
- PHILOSOPHICAL knowledge which depends upon sense perception and experience and which advances by the light of the intellect alone. **
- **PHILOSOPHY****and the sciences function within the order of natural reason;
while
- FAITH, enlightened and guided by the Spirit, recognizes in the message of salvation the “fullness of grace and truth” (cf. Jn 1:14) which God has willed to reveal in history and definitively through his Son, Jesus Christ (cf. 1 Jn 5:9; Jn 5:31-32)."
:compcoff: Link: vatican.va/edocs/ENG0216/__P1.HTM
Faith is all we actually have. All axioms are inductions and as such no knowledge is certain. What you are calling evidence is just faith you feel comfortable with asserting as true.FAIR Question
Can one actually have “faith” if it is foundational on evidence?
=Earnest Bunbury;8175161]Truth is one in God but is reasoned by man in varying concepts and rational hierarchies of truths leading to the one truth that is both object and subject of God. God’s Nature reflected in His Creation and known to us by our spiritual nature by the essence and being of created things leads us to know that there is natural theology, that is unless this essence and being is denied as understandable or able to be known by us. Denying that things in themselves can be known or that truth is itself unknowable is false, but this is what makes up modern philosophy today in distinction to Scholastic philosophy.
The Church relies for the most part on Scholastic metaphysics and philosophy to describe what is known by God revealing to us the truth. Rationalism dictates that we must prove this revelation from the bottom up, from the truths of natural causes to the first cause. But the first cause is a prime reality that cannot be fathomed by us but only philosophically reasoned by known effects leading to a cause. Absolute proof is impossible from our vantage point. We are a contingent reality and God is the Prime Reality, the source and principle of this contingent reality.
Well Done!The proof of faith is union with the source of creation as our end and perfection. If we are wallowing in sin with a lack of faith and if we fail in virtue, and don’t care that we are failing, have no hope, then we are not in union with the source of grace, the source of faith, and ultimate Truth, God. These are effects leading from a cause which is the way one proves anything beyond what can be understood naturally, that is philosophically. It is based in faith though, faith seeking understanding, both of which come from God and lead us back to Him.
Certainly not the faith taught by the Church; our faith is more properly understood as “trust” – trust in reason.Faith is belief without evidence, so your question makes very little sense.