Can gays be catholic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Teen4Christ
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
That link displays decietful information and is terriblly misleading.

It misrepresents the APA’s stance on homosexuality, the cited 880 people study was heavily biased and flawed (the psycologists involved did not provide all of the data and did not differentiate between homosexuals and bisexuals). Even when looking at the “results” of that study, Dr Nicolosi is virtually saying that there is nearly a 100% failure rate in cureing homosexuality (there were “improvements” but no actual “cures”, they still need therapy).

He does not mention that repartive therapy is a dangerous and potentially life threatening form of therapy, it is not recomended or approved by the APA (or any psycological organisation in the west) and that further research is needed to determine its effectivness and safeness.

I dont know a whole lot about courage, they seem to be more about practicing celebacy. But they believe that people can change their sexual orientation (only if they want to). I suspect that they may use repartive therapy to do this.

They could be a place to go if you feel that you need help with keeping with cathloic teachings.
Courage is a ministry of the Catholic Church under the auspices of Family Life Ministries. It does not advocate any kind of theraphy or a change of one’s orientation from homosexual to heterosexual. There are some Protestant and Mormon groups out there that put people through these horrible experiences. Courage is not one of them.

Courage is compassionate and attempts to meet the person where they’re at and lead them to a closer union to Christ by helping them establish five goals in their lives.

Here is a link to their five goals. I hope this helps.

couragerc.net/TheFiveGoals.html
 
Courage is a ministry of the Catholic Church under the auspices of Family Life Ministries. It does not advocate any kind of theraphy or a change of one’s orientation from homosexual to heterosexual. There are some Protestant and Mormon groups out there that put people through these horrible experiences. Courage is not one of them.

Courage is compassionate and attempts to meet the person where they’re at and lead them to a closer union to Christ by helping them establish five goals in their lives.

Here is a link to their five goals. I hope this helps.

couragerc.net/TheFiveGoals.html
I was with you until I found their link to NARTH in the testimonials, their reparational groups on the main site and the stuff in the related website page.

I dont have a problem with the celebacy bit and providing assistance/encouragement for people who need it, that is a great idea if you choose to follow cathloic teachings, but I dont agree with some of the groups that they associate themsevles with or the therapy that they use.

I was hoping that they would be different and not associate themselves with groups like NARTH.
 
I was with you until I found their link to NARTH in the testimonials, their reparational groups on the main site and the stuff in the related website page.

I dont have a problem with the celebacy bit and providing assistance/encouragement for people who need it, that is a great idea if you choose to follow cathloic teachings, but I dont agree with some of the groups that they associate themsevles with or the therapy that they use.

I was hoping that they would be different and not associate themselves with groups like NARTH.
I saw the link also, but I also know the ministry. They are not associated with NARTH or other groups. Courage is autonomous.

Do they have links on their site that related to their ministry, yes. Does Courage tell people that they have to use these programs and services, no.

I provided spiritual direction (many years ago) for some people who were involved in Courage. There was no mention of having to go anywhere else.

I have not been involved with this ministry for many years, more than 10. It was part of my internship. I can’t claim to be an expert in spirituality for gay people. I can only speak of what I saw at the chapter where I interned. It was good and compassionate.

I have to admit that their gatherings needed a little more life, but that may have been due to the fact that the group may have wanted to keep attention away from them as they met in a room in the parish hall.

If it’s helpful, check it out. The one group that I will definitely steer people away from is Parents and Friends of Ex-lesbians and Gays. There is too much control over their members private lives.

I believe in good spiritual direction, good pastoral counseling and good therapy when needed, but none of the above are supposed to control their proteges.

Those are my two cents.
 
Those are my two cents.
I thought that I would put this bit first and say that I respect your opinion/experiences and although I may not agree with them, it does not mean that I would demean them.
I saw the link also, but I also know the ministry. They are not associated with NARTH or other groups. Courage is autonomous.
That may very well be the case, but placing links to such groups does show an “endorsment” to their methods and ideals. Its something that I wouldnt do unless I agreed/condoned with the actions/ideals of the group that I was providing a link to.
Do they have links on their site that related to their ministry, yes. Does Courage tell people that they have to use these programs and services, no.
No they dont and it is a voluntary decission for the people who join courage, but I dont really think that those groups should be related to their ministry and as I already mentioned providing those links endorses those groups.
I provided spiritual direction (many years ago) for some people who were involved in Courage. There was no mention of having to go anywhere else.
I never actually believed that there was, otherwise they wouldnt promote the celebacy part and suggest that its fine to live celebant.
I have not been involved with this ministry for many years, more than 10. It was part of my internship. I can’t claim to be an expert in spirituality for gay people. I can only speak of what I saw at the chapter where I interned. It was good and compassionate.
I have to admit that their gatherings needed a little more life, but that may have been due to the fact that the group may have wanted to keep attention away from them as they met in a room in the parish hall.
As I said, I believe that it is a great idea and good for people that require support (I like how they also think of the families as well). I am just not keen on the therapy that they use on some and other groups that they endorse. Without those it would be a fantastic organisation.
If it’s helpful, check it out.
I have to ask, was that directed to me or just in general?

Because Im not homosexual.
The one group that I will definitely steer people away from is Parents and Friends of Ex-lesbians and Gays. There is too much control over their members private lives.
Some groups can be like that, regardless of what they represent or do.
I believe in good spiritual direction, good pastoral counseling and good therapy when needed, but none of the above are supposed to control their proteges.
They are reasonable things to live by.
 
I thought that I would put this bit first and say that I respect your opinion/experiences and although I may not agree with them, it does not mean that I would demean them.
Thank you. The key is to try to understand the other person’s perspective.

I’ll share a story about a gay boy in our program. Let’s call him Pepe, to protect his privacy. Contrary to popular opinion and movies, people with autism, especially high functioning ones, tend to speak their mind. They have a very tough time with subtleties, hummour and such things as figures of speech. Pepe told another boy that he loved him. The other boy came to my office feeling very confused. When I asked him what was confusing, he said that he was not sure how Pepe loved him. After explaining different kinds of love and giving a lot of examples of loving relationships between people, I explained that it was OK for Pepe to love him and for him to love Pepe, just as he loved his best friend. I can’t remember the sequence of the conversation, but I must had asked if he had a best friend. Why else would that come up. The boy left my office very happy knowing that he could love Pepe and that they could be good friends. He also felt happy that he could love from another perspective that was not sexual. He could even accept that someone else felt a sexual attraction for him, but that he did not have to respond in kind and he could continue to love him in return, because love has many perspectives.

The point I’m making here is that these adolescents had one thing in common, that was love. They differed on their interpretation of love. For the one, love included a sexual attraction and for the other love excluded the sexual, but the friendship was important to him. When two people are sharing, as we are, they can be on the same page as long as they understand each other’s perspective and find the common ground that is mutually beneficial.

Your statement reminded me of this old story. It happened about three years ago. It’s ok to disagree. As long as we find a common ground, there is always room for sharing and growth. I hope this makes sense.
That may very well be the case, but placing links to such groups does show an “endorsment” to their methods and ideals. Its something that I wouldnt do unless I agreed/condoned with the actions/ideals of the group that I was providing a link to.
I’m not going to defend or dismiss Courage on this score. I have no idea why the link is there. For all I know it could have been placed there by the webmaster because he or she was tyring to create a list of resources for people. As I understand it, Father Harvey and his team do not use any of these methods.

I believe that what makes Courage a very interesting organization is not that they promote celibacy, but they provide a spirituality that the person can work with. They provide opportunities for gay and lesbian people to be together in situations that are spiritually and psychologically fulfilling without moral comprimises. They also are non judgemental. They accept that we all sin and that all need converstion. They don’t have this thing that the far right has that all gay people are going to burn in hell, while straight people can do as the please. In fact, when you do spiritual direction with someone from Courage, hell is not mentioned. The name of the movement is Courage, not Fear. They leave the state of the individual soul to be examined by the confessor. They do not cross that line. Lay people have a tendency to scream “MORTAL SIN” when we hear gay sex.

The Church will always speak in objective terms. Objectively gay sex, like any other form of promiscuity is a grave sin, the Church also understands that people are working through issues at different levels. This is why a good confessor and a constant one is so important. I’ll use a crazy example. If a person sucks their thumb and is trying to change that behaviour, one has to give them credit for sucking their thumb less and less. There is definitely importance in the fact that the frequency and intensity of the behaviour is decreesing until it’s brought under some kind of control. A good confessor can gage this with the penitent. Not everything is accomplished in a day. Try to stop smoking sometime. Cold turkey works for some and for others it’s a process.

continued
 
continuation
I say to people who are engaged in sinful behaviours, the importance is to begin the journey with a good confessor. As to the rhetoric that the average lay person will give you, because they read a pastoral letter or a decree from the Church, take it with a grain of salt. Ultimately, you and your confessor have to work out the degree of culpability and what responsibility you must assume for your behaviour and how to go about it.

While I believe that these forums are good, most of the people who post here and quote this document and that document are doing just that. They’re quoting a document that was written to present an objective truth. As to how to bring it from the level of objective truth to a dialy aplication in the individual’s spiritual growth, that is a whole other story. That story is written between the individual, spiritual director and confessor. Just make sure that you work with a spiritual director and confessor that understands the document and the issue itself. There are many good ones out there.

As I said, I interned with Courage in believe it was in 1995 or 6. The priest who was in charge of the group was absolutely awesome. His focus was bringing people together into families, including the biological family when possible. He also recognized that people (gay or straight) are often promiscuous because they are missing something to nurture them. This is what I liked about courage. I have no reservations recommending them.
As I said, I believe that it is a great idea and good for people that require support (I like how they also think of the families as well). I am just not keen on the therapy that they use on some and other groups that they endorse. Without those it would be a fantastic organisation.
I realize that this is off thread, but I don’t like many of the groups and links that I find on CAF. I use what works for me.
I have to ask, was that directed to me or just in general? Because Im not homosexual.
It was unsure if you are gay or not. It doesn’t really matter to me. If you or someone you know can use this information, share it.

I don’t let my blood presure rise because someone is gay, even if they are in a relationship. If I were going to do that, I would be sick all the time. I know straight people who live with their signficant others. I know teens who are sexually active. You call a spade a spade and then you let people take the consequences for their behaviour.
What I always try to bring to the table in all of this is that God loves us all. He calls us to a deeper union with him, but I also accept that he does not call us the same way or down the same road. Look at the Apostles, Paul, Augustine, Francis of Assisi, Mother Teresa and many others.

I love Augustine when it comes to this topic. Apparently he couldn’t keep his pants on. Monica never despaired. Can you imagine Monica ranting and raving because Augustine was promiscuous? She did her job as a parent and put the rest in God’s hands.

Sometimes I wonder if people (not only Christians) feel that they have to do God’s job, because he’s not doing it well enough or fast enough, especially on hot issues such as this.

To return to the original thread, gay people can be Catholic by the mere fact that there are gays who are Catholic. As to the state of their soul? We can look at what the Church teaches and make universal or objective statements. As to the individual soul, that’s hands off except for the confessor and spiritual director. This is why I believe that if a person has such a problem and does not have a good director and confessor, Courage or any other such Church based organization is helpful.

I hope this helps.
 
This poster has done this numerous times and has had all his questions answered again and again. Unfortunately, he does not like the answers he is given hence the new threads.
What I am about to say, I do not say with a mean spirit. I’m a Master’s student in Psychology, specializing in Abnormal Psych with a minor in Sexuality. I am trying to educate and help.

The OP posts REPEATEDLY the same question, knowing full well that he will be told he is a sinner, if he does not change he will go to hell, that he is wrong wrong wrong. Each respondent has been very generous in providing the same answer, AGAIN. There is absolutely nothing wrong with your answers … he gets it.

Teen4Christ, I suspect you know this but if you do not, I am telling you now so that you can seek help. Seeking out reprimand and humiliation to indulge and further your feelings of guilt and shame is a FETISH. You know that if you are a sexually active homosexual that it is a sin and YOU LIKE BEING TOLD THAT. I suspect you it makes your heart race a little faster each time a poster tells you that you are a sinner, which is why you keep switching back and forth between “I’m confused” and “God loves gays” … it keeps the conversation going and the ‘insults’ coming.

The fact that you enjoy (and quite likely become sexually aroused at) your guilt and shame is VERY VERY COMMON. You can get help for this. Find a therapist who specializes in fetishes and addictions. After you seek treatment you won’t need to keep asking questions you already know the answer to. I have a couple therapists in mind if you need a name.

I am sorry that I had to do this, but it’s ridiculous for so many good people to keep helping when he’s not using your words for the reasons you think. I doubt the OP doesn’t know this already (for the internet has a ridiculous amount of info on fetishes) but in case he didn’t, he needs to know.
 
Can they?:confused:
No.

One cannot serve two masters. A Catholic cannot decide to remain in a state of mortal sin and still hope to obtain the full effects of the fruits of the Church. One who wishes to remain Catholic must be a soldier to fight evils of every kind.

A Catholic who is inflicted with this form of temptation and who remains committed to fight it and is sincere about it, is trying. The difference is unlike the person in the first paragraph, he has sworn allegiance to God to do his best and with the help of the Church will once again regain God’s friendship through repentance choosing heaven as his reward.

Being Catholic doesn’t allow for resignation to sin. One must deny oneself.

AndyF
 
Of course they can. Catholic means universal, and their “sin” in some people’s eyes (I do not believe it is, it is just the who they are) is no worse than other sins everyone else does. They are just normal, regular people.
No, they’re not. What’s in the water where you live, anyway?
 
No, they’re not. What’s in the water where you live, anyway?
As far as I know, there is not excommunication for being gay. There are gays who are Catholic or Catholics who are gay.

Are you saying that there aren’t? I’m confused.
 
I don’t believe it’s necessary to quote the Church’s official teaching on homosexual acts. Most of us know it. That being said, the Church also has a message for the rest of us. Sometimes, it’s too easy to raise the voice of condemnation against the other person, forgetting our duties and obligations as a faith community. I thought I’d share these quotes from the above referenced document, as I believe that it is important for Catholics to keep a peaceful balance in our perspectives if we are to preach the Good News to others and to maintain our inner peace.

If there is one danger that I’m finding in CAF forums is the level of anger that many bring to these threads. When I examine the great saints of the Church, one of their most outstanding qualities was their ability to find inner silence in the midst of chaos.

CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH
LETTER TO THE BISHOPS OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
ON THE PASTORAL CARE OF HOMOSEXUAL PERSONS

  1. It is deplorable that homosexual persons have been and are the object of violent malice in speech or in action. Such treatment deserves condemnation from the Church’s pastors wherever it occurs. It reveals a kind of disregard for others which endangers the most fundamental principles of a healthy society. The intrinsic dignity of each person must always be respected in word, in action and in law.
  2. From this multi-faceted approach there are numerous advantages to be gained, not the least of which is the realization that a homosexual person, as every human being, deeply needs to be nourished at many different levels simultaneously.
The human person, made in the image and likeness of God, can hardly be adequately described by a reductionist reference to his or her sexual orientation. Every one living on the face of the earth has personal problems and difficulties, but challenges to growth, strengths, talents and gifts as well. Today, the Church provides a badly needed context for the care of the human person when she refuses to consider the person as a “heterosexual” or a “homosexual” and insists that every person has a fundamental Identity: the creature of God, and by grace, his child and heir to eternal life

I thought this was very interesting.

vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19861001_homosexual-persons_en.html
 
The answer to this question is the same as to the following:
  1. Can people who use artificial birth control be Catholic?
  2. Can two young people who live together (not housemates) be Catholic?
  3. Can a peson who cheats on their spouse be Catholic?
  4. Can an adolescent who masturbates be Catholic?
Unless you’re excommunicated, you’re Catholic. You may be sinning, but you’re not outside the Catholic community. If we excommunicated every sinner where would we be?

There are some situations in which there is an ipso facto excommunication. Homosexual intercourse is not one of them, abortion is, so is remarriage after divorce, attempting marriage when one is in solemn vows, defying a direct mandate of the Pope and so forth.

The Church wants to lead men and women to God, not chase them away or threaten them.
 
Can they?:confused:
Of course. I am gay and Catholic myself.

Yes, it does say in the Catechism that we are called to chastity.

However, I suggest you to look into the concept of the “primacy of conscience.” The church teaches that we must follow our conscience on such issues. A sin done in good conscience is still a sin, but whatever happens is between you and God. I can’t tell you what to think of this matter - this is for you to decide.

I also invite you down to gaychristian.com If you’re looking for a welcoming place for gay Christians, then this is it. There is a special section for gay Catholics (and just about every other denomination). The site is not just for active homosexuals (called Side A) but also for celibate homosexuals (Side B) - and both sides are to be respectful of each other.
 
However, I suggest you to look into the concept of the “primacy of conscience.” The church teaches that we must follow our conscience on such issues. A sin done in good conscience is still a sin, but whatever happens is between you and God.
Phonemic, you will be criticized for this statement. I don’t believe it is a mainstream view, and it definitely is outside the norm for CAF.

But welcome to CAF. I hope you will stick around and share your views with us.
I also invite you down to gaychristian.com If you’re looking for a welcoming place for gay Christians, then this is it.
tsk, tsk… trying to lure forum goers to another forum is poor manners. :tsktsk:

😉

It looks to be an interesting site. Anything which brings us closer to Christ is a good thing, isn’t it?
 
Phonemic, you will be criticized for this statement. I don’t believe it is a mainstream view, and it definitely is outside the norm for CAF.

But welcome to CAF. I hope you will stick around and share your views with us.
Well, thank you, Dale. As for being criticized, that’s to be expected.

As for being out of the mainstream, that may be the case. But the primacy of conscience is nothing new; it’s in the catechism.

Also, the following link may be of some interest: natcath.com/NCR_Online/archives/011698/011698d.htm

Phonemic
 
Of course. I am gay and Catholic myself.

Yes, it does say in the Catechism that we are called to chastity.

However, I suggest you to look into the concept of the “primacy of conscience.” The church teaches that we must follow our conscience on such issues. A sin done in good conscience is still a sin, but whatever happens is between you and God. I can’t tell you what to think of this matter - this is for you to decide.
Where does the Church state following an erroneous conscience is best?

The Church specifically states Catholics are to follow Church teachings and not place their conscience in opposition to such teachings.

Claiming a “primacy of conscience” to commit bad acts is contrary to Church teaching.

Such reasoning actually places conscience above truth.

1790 A human being must always obey the certain judgment of his conscience. If he were deliberately to act against it, he would condemn himself. Yet it can happen that moral conscience remains in ignorance and makes erroneous judgments about acts to be performed or already committed.

1791 This ignorance can often be imputed to personal responsibility. This is the case when a man "takes little trouble to find out what is true and good, or when conscience is by degrees almost blinded through the habit of committing sin."59 In such cases, the person is culpable for the evil he commits.

1792 Ignorance of Christ and his Gospel, bad example given by others, enslavement to one’s passions, assertion of a mistaken notion of autonomy of conscience, rejection of the Church’s authority and her teaching, lack of conversion and of charity: these can be at the source of errors of judgment in moral conduct.
 
Where does the Church state following an erroneous conscience is best?
Here
IV. ERRONEOUS JUDGMENT
1790
A human being must always obey the certain judgment of his conscience. If he were deliberately to act against it, he would condemn himself. Yet it can happen that moral conscience remains in ignorance and makes erroneous judgments about acts to be performed or already committed.
However the catechism also says that homosexual acts are gravley disordered (and sinfull) I don’t see how a Catholic could commit homosexual acts in good conscience knowing this.
2357 Homosexuality refers to relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction toward persons of the same sex. It has taken a great variety of forms through the centuries and in different cultures. Its psychological genesis remains largely unexplained. Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity,141 tradition has always declared that "homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered."142 They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved.
emphasis added.

peace,
 
We really need to use the term “people who have same-sex attraction”
The catechism does not state nor is it a teaching of the church that “they’re born that way”

The church teaches that this desire is disordered.

It is not an undisputed scientific fact that it is the same as being born black or Polish -
For many - it is a choice based on disordered childhood/parenting/abuse/molestation or many other combinations of things -
Scripture says “He made them male and female”.

Most boys who were “brought up” by a molesting uncle or “friend of the family” believe they “are homosexual” because that’s all they’ve ever known.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top