Can God have an Only begotten daugher?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Doves411
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I had just read that article before I opened your link!😃

Okay that makes more sense. So God has no gender because He is spirit, however, his nature is masculine. Since He is masculine in spirit, He became Man ( not woman) in the Flesh as Jesus Christ. Am I understanding this correctly?
Yes.
Yeah I don’t like the whole ā€œpolitical correctnessā€ when referring to God. He told us to refer to Him as the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit so that’s how I’m going to refer to Him. šŸ™‚
šŸ‘
 
I’m not clear that OP is questioning Jesus’ gender, or rather that she (he?) is concerned that the use of ā€œsonā€ might suggest/leave open the possibility of God the Father having in the past or sometime in the future begotton/begetting a daughter. The subject line seems to indicate the latter, and then the notion that if the sacred writers had just said ā€œOnly Begottenā€ it would make it clear that there was not and would not be a female counterpart.

But I am not sure what the request for sources means. Sources on what, Doves?

I think that in terms of the fulfillment of the Covenant promises, the legal status of the firstborn son necessitated that the only-begotten be male, btw.

Sally
 
I’m not clear that OP is questioning Jesus’ gender, or rather that she (he?) is concerned that the use of ā€œsonā€ might suggest/leave open the possibility of God the Father having in the past or sometime in the future begotton/begetting a daughter. The subject line seems to indicate the latter, and then the notion that if the sacred writers had just said ā€œOnly Begottenā€ it would make it clear that there was not and would not be a female counterpart.

But I am not sure what the request for sources means. Sources on what, Doves?

I think that in terms of the fulfillment of the Covenant promises, the legal status of the firstborn son necessitated that the only-begotten be male, btw.

Sally
The latter: ***the use of ā€œsonā€ might suggest/leave open the possibility of God the Father having in the past or sometime in the future begotton/begetting a daughter. ***

So why was it necessary that Jesus be male?
 
The latter: ***the use of ā€œsonā€ might suggest/leave open the possibility of God the Father having in the past or sometime in the future begotton/begetting a daughter. ***

So why was it necessary that Jesus be male?
There is no past or future with God. God is eternal (a thousand years is like a day and a day like a thousand years).

Jesus is the eternally begotten Son of God. Eternally meaning that it has always been that way. God the Son has always existed with God the Father and God the Holy Spirit.
 
I think God absolutely could have become incarnate as a woman, had it been His good pleasure, but it would be horrible heresy to say that he actually did do such a thing, in the universe which actually came to pass.
 
I guess my question is more why does Scripture state that Jesus is God’s only Begotten Son, not only begotten child? Does Scripture mean the same thing? Does it mean the Jesus is God’s only Begotton Child who is male?
I believe for your purposes, yes.

Sally
 
I don’t believe there are any Prophecy’s that should point to a begotten daughter, but rather a Son.

Psalm 2:7 I will declare the decree: the Lord hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.

8 Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession.

9 Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter’s vessel.

10 Be wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of the earth.

11 Serve the Lord with fear, and rejoice with trembling.

12 Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in him.
 
The Father Did Have A Daughter Manifest. One Not Known To Man, Never ReinCarnated. One Who Told The Angels They Were Sleeping. One Who Knew All Was Blind. One Who Was Hidden. One Who Was Alone. Sounds Crazy, Doesn’t It?
 
God could have sent a daughter, but considering the time and culture He chose to reveal the mystery of Salvation in, a woman would not have been effective. Women were second class citizens and would not have been able to gather others to follow her. ( who woud keep everyone fed?)

As it is, there were times inthe beginning that it looked like the whole project would be a no go. If Paul hadn’t begun to speak up, well, we might not be where we are now.

Is a sad thing, but true. A woman woud not have been heard.
 
The Father Did Have A Daughter Manifest. One Not Known To Man, Never ReinCarnated. One Who Told The Angels They Were Sleeping. One Who Knew All Was Blind. One Who Was Hidden. One Who Was Alone. Sounds Crazy, Doesn’t It?
Friend, it is plain to Catholics that what you wrote about is not from Christ. It looks to be from some sort of mystery religion.

Your viewpoint is quite welcome here, but you should mention its source. Wicca? Gnosticism?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top