R
Robert_Sock
Guest
I contend that there are no such thing as an accident, and that God is in complete control. Are our prayers for safety all for naught?
I don’t know about you, but I’m always a bit of a fatalist when it comes to prayer for safety, healing etc. I suppose in that respect my expectation lines up with that of the Moslems viz. “God willing”.I contend that there are no such thing as an accident, and that God is in complete control. Are our prayers for safety all for naught?
It was quite an horrific accident.Ms Whiley was among a group of friends from a church group swimming in waist-deep water 15 metres offshore.
Now I’ve been swimming in the same water, but didn’t get attacked. There’s only been two recorded attacks there, and this was one of them.Amity Point boasts some of the largest shark numbers in the world, though shark attacks are rare, with only two recorded attacks.[citation needed] Despite the presence of shark drumlines, in places since 1997, a Brisbane woman was mauled to death by sharks while swimming in Rainbow Channel.[5] The species of shark remains unknown, with bull sharks suspected by an expert and tiger sharks suggested by locals.[6]
What about free will and personal responsibility?I contend that there are no such thing as an accident, and that God is in complete control. Are our prayers for safety all for naught?
No! Miracles occur but it is impossible to know the precise number because we are not omniscient and many of them have intangible results. To think they are rare is to underestimate God’s power and love for us. Accidents are inevitable in an immensely complex universe where countless events occur at every moment but it is within the divine framework of order and regularity; otherwise it would be impossible to predict anything, let alone survive “all the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune”.I contend that there are no such thing as an accident, and that God is in complete control. Are our prayers for safety all for naught?
I mean, I’m no theologian. I did my Lutheran confirmation classes, and have read independently. But I don’t think God contradicts accidents. (Granting God, for the sake of argument) I think that God can create the world, allow for free will, and he lets the cards fall where they may - except when he wants to get involved more actively. Now, is that how it went down? I don’t know. But that doesn’t seem contradictory to me.
I’m confused that God would ordain chance in our world and then perform miracles to control it. Why not just assume that God always has absolute control, as many Jews believe? Note that these Jews also believe in free will.No! Miracles occur but it is impossible to know the precise number because we are not omniscient and many of them have intangible results. To think they are rare is to underestimate God’s power and love for us. Accidents are inevitable in an immensely complex universe where countless events occur at every moment but it is within the divine framework of order and regularity; otherwise it would be impossible to predict anything, let alone survive “all the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune”.
There is no reason - apart from natural causes - why earthquakes occur in inhabited regions like Nepal. They are permitted by God because a constant spate of miracles would defeat the purpose of creating a world in which we can take precautions to avoid danger. Mexico City, for example, is a disaster waiting to happen. To build skyscrapers in such an unstable environment is lunacy for which there is no excuse. To blame God is absurd when human greed and selfishness overcome common sense and consideration for others.
Even though there is an element of chance life is not entirely unpredictable. To that extent we alone are responsible for most of the needless suffering on this planet. The rest is due to the interplay of the very conditions necessary for life. We cannot expect to have everything for nothing. Every advantage has a corresponding disadvantage, regardless of whether we like it or refuse to admit it. Believing in heaven doesn’t mean we are not down to earth! In fact the reverse is true. An earth without heaven is an inexplicable phenomenon given the reality of truth, goodness and love…
Accidents are not all by chance, but many can be. And sometimes you put yourself in a situation where the chance of an accident is higher.I contend that there are no such thing as an accident, and that God is in complete control. Are our prayers for safety all for naught?
God has absolute control but usually He works through the laws of nature. Otherwise we would never know what to expect next! There has to be a limit to the number of miracles if we are to lead a rational existence.I’m confused that God would ordain chance in our world and then perform miracles to control it. Why not just assume that God always has absolute control, as many Jews believe? Note that these Jews also believe in free will.
No, they are not for naught otherwise prayer would be useless and God wouldn’t be as a Father to us. Just about the entire bible is filled with prayers and stories about God protecting those who hope, trust, and pray to Him. We also believe in the providence of God which the CCC devotes a few pages or chapter too in explaining it. Jesus also taught it when he said that all the hairs of our head are counted and not one sparrow falls to the ground without our father’s knowledge. Nothing happens in the world outside of God’s providence, knowledge, and will.I contend that there are no such thing as an accident, and that God is in complete control. Are our prayers for safety all for naught?
That is perfectly true but it doesn’t follow that God **directly wills **accidents.The term “accident” is still meaningful, as the term “befall” suggests, and so is the term “coincidence”. There is no **reason **why an earthquake occurs in an inhabited area like Nepal. God doesn’t intend it to maim and kill living creatures. He permits it because **unplanned **coincidences are an intrinsic feature of any complex physical system. It is impossible for no one ever to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. As Bob pointed out, we can “push our luck” by doing things that are unsafe but we don’t always know when we are in danger. The laws of nature are not infallible and neither are we!“And I saw that truly nothing happens by accident or luck, but everything by God’s wise providence. If it seems to be accident or luck from our point of view, our blindness and lack of foreknowledge is the cause; for matters that have been in God’s foreseeing wisdom since before time began befall us suddenly, all unawares; and so in our blindness and ignorance we say that this is accident or luck, but to our Lord God it is not so.”
― Julian of Norwich, Revelations of Divine Love
I would love to see you argue this out with an Orthodox Jew! I think that such a debate would likely shed great light.That is perfectly true but it doesn’t follow that God **directly wills **accidents.The term “accident” is still meaningful, as the term “befall” suggests, and so is the term “coincidence”. There is no **reason **why an earthquake occurs in an inhabited area like Nepal. God doesn’t intend it to maim and kill living creatures. He permits it because **unplanned **coincidences are an intrinsic feature of any complex physical system. It is impossible for no one ever to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. As Bob pointed out, we can “push our luck” by doing things that are unsafe but we don’t always know when we are in danger. The laws of nature are not infallible and neither are we!
Good quote! This is in agreement with what St Augustine and St Thomas Aquinas say:“And I saw that truly nothing happens by accident or luck, but everything by God’s wise providence. If it seems to be accident or luck from our point of view, our blindness and lack of foreknowledge is the cause; for matters that have been in God’s foreseeing wisdom since before time began befall us suddenly, all unawares; and so in our blindness and ignorance we say that this is accident or luck, but to our Lord God it is not so.”
― Julian of Norwich, Revelations of Divine Love
There was a Jewish contributor to this forum. I think his user name is “melzerboy” but I can’t find any of his posts.I would love to see you argue this out with an Orthodox Jew! I think that such a debate would likely shed great light.
That is the outstanding difficulty of the Chance hypothesis. Why do we imagine some events are purposeful if there aren’t any? And if our thinking isn’t purposeful does it make sense to believe in anything?I dare say that if we had no knowledge of the rising of Christ and the purpose of the cross in retrospect – no gospel teachings that is, the death of the Lord would have likely been absorbed into the quicksand of “just another example of ill fate” for those who witnessed it. The widely various non true interpretations that the crucifixion and gospel suffers from in the world’s understanding all stem from a leaning toward one type of chance’s likelihood over another. This can be said for anything that seems without purpose until it is explained.
He’s not an Orthodox Jew per se, but reform if I remember correctly. However his views may lead to greater insight.There was a Jewish contributor to this forum. I think his user name is “melzerboy” but I can’t find any of his posts.