Can he be the pastor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CyrilSebastian
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
For the second time, i don’t know how to link and we have been warned already.
I already explained that all you have to do is highlight, and copy the URL in the bar at the top of you computer screen. For example: www.usccb.org is the address to the US Conference of Catholic Bishops. Then paste it on the page, like I just did with the USCCB.

But okay. The fact is no evidence has been shown that any protestant communion, non-denom, mainstream, none, use an online ordination process. Unless you can prove otherwise.

Jon
 
I already explained that all you have to do is highlight, and copy the URL in the bar at the top of you computer screen. For example: www.usccb.org is the address to the US Conference of Catholic Bishops. Then paste it on the page, like I just did with the USCCB.

But okay. The fact is no evidence has been shown that any protestant communion, non-denom, mainstream, none, use an online ordination process. Unless you can prove otherwise.

Jon
I’m on a phone and I’m glad you are smugly happy with yourself
 
Interesting

I have encountered, let us call it, an “internet credentialing” simply because someone was asking me what to make of the concept and actually I had to do research to understand what was even being asked as it was very foreign…in every sense of that word.

snip…

But, even in the more extreme cases like this, I have not actually met people who seriously posited that they were ordained over the Internet and that such was then the basis for them shepherding a congregation. Where in the United States does this phenomenon happen, since “It has added greatly to the proliferation of Protestant faith and churches”? It is a straight forward question. I wish to find out a bit more about this phenomenon, if it really exists, as I am genuinely fascinated by what has been brought up in this thread.

Most of the people I have met that were in a tradition somehow stemming from the reform were from more conventional backgrounds and practices. When the moment arrived to talk about how they or the one over their group was ordained, some ordinance was described to me that – however distinct it may be from Catholic theology – had elements the logic of which I easily grasped. (I have always found most interesting speaking with those who have a thought process that the ordination is actually effected by the believing community; that supposes an interesting ecclesiology and derivative concept of ministry.)

I remember once I was on a visit to a place in the United States. A group I had met with was also located there. They had invited me to visit them in their church, which they wanted me to see. Fascinated by the opportunity, I set aside a couple of hours to do so. I remember they were so proud of their worship space and showing me how it facilitated their form of worship service, which was very musically oriented. It is where I had an introduction to the terminology of “church planting”

They were also proud of the state of the art coffee shop they had in the narthex (really I should say lobby – the whole scheme all seemed modeled on an American concert theatre, actually). They assured me it was quite a tool for evangelising unchurched young people. I told them I found American Catholics very enthusiastic about coffee as well but that the basements I had visited were not so state of the art…and that the crypts and undercrofts in Europe typically have the dead of centuries past about and really do not readily lend themselves to such innovations of today as making them venues for partaking coffee.

Are these ecclesial communities with their internet ordinations unaligned, I assume? Who EXACTLY are they? Who constitutes their congregations? How, theologically, do they understand an ordination to be effected over the Internet?
The United States as part of the state function will not serve to help enforce any religious sect’s rules and by laws. And the government will not give preference to any religious community over others. Therefore some people have sprung forward to provide certification, often for the commercial purpose of being a state deputy for wedding ceremonies.
 
I unofficially dropped out of this thread a while back, but if no one minds I’d like to return and “piggy back” on what someone (I forget who) said: Among Protestants there are “fundamentalists” and there are regular Protestants. Which is not too surprising, considering among Catholics there are “traditionalists” and there are regular Catholics.

The thing is, though, that sometimes all attention focuses on the fundamentalists or traditionalists. And I think that happens more on web forums than anywhere else.
 
And most of those churches are small groups that meet in homes or a storefront that don’t give a hoot about ordination. Many IFB splinter groups look down upon ordination, it simply isn’t important to them.
^ This.

John Doe can hang a sign on a storefront “Deep River Gospel Fellowship” with no credentials whatsoever and be the pastor. He is, for all practical purposes, his own denomination and is not bound by preexisting rules.

That said, many denominations do require some kind of training for their leaders/pastors.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top