D
Debora123
Guest
Can a gay man who lives a chaste life style become a priest? And if not, why?
Thanks for the answers.
Thanks for the answers.
This must be handled delicately. A 2005 directive stated that those with homosexual tendencies must conquer said tendencies within three years of thei ordination to the Diaconate. I suppose it would be up to the local Bishop in order to accept a chaste homosexual into the Priesthood.Can a gay man who lives a chaste life style become a priest? And if not, why?
Thanks for the answers.
Indeed. A man with SSA can become a priest, however, it should be mentioned that having SSA does not automatically qualify one for Priesthood, just because men with SSA have an obligation to live chastely, anyway. (This post wasn’t suggesting it, I just had to addThis must be handled delicately. A 2005 directive stated that those with homosexual tendencies must conquer said tendencies within three years of thei ordination to the Diaconate. I suppose it would be up to the local Bishop in order to accept a chaste homosexual into the Priesthood.
This may be of some help.
~ Pius :knight1:
I’m not gay or a gay rights supporter but they ought to. I mean they’re not having sex so, they should.
And to anybody and I mean anybody who brings up “the scandal”.
*]Those priests aren’t homosexuals, they’re pedophiles.
*]And before you say “no, they’re ephebophiles”. That’s still not homosexuality. Just like if you’re a grown man who has sex with a 14 year old girl, you’re not an everyday heterosexual, that’s ephebophilia.
*]There are more heterosexual pedophiles than homosexual ones.
Sorry Debora, I had to clear up that because I know a lot of people who are going to bring these arguments up.
But they’re not considered homosexuals if those victims are not adults.The guilty priesty priests are NOT considered pedophiles if the victim is pubescent…
Not every single homosexual who comes into the clergy will rape children.the vast majority of those men were homosexual AND pedophiles.
The topic isn’t about sexual predators, its a general question about chaste homosexuals. And, yes, it is possible for them to become ordained. Such individuals should find a good spiritual director they can trust.
I can go on and on about women lolThe older I get, the less I know about men - strange creatures.
Well I bet that is right. Even Freud asked plaintively, “what do women want?” For us that is an easy peasy question, that unfortunately, we do not seen to communicate well to our brothers because we don’t speak their languageI can go on and on about women lol![]()
THIS.It’s almost as if people think that non-SSA Priests have no sexual attraction at all. That’s ridiculous. Of course they do. (Well, the vast majority do, anyway!)
This is understood as a problem by the Church not an advantage. The relation of a priest to the laity is that of a spiritual father.In fact, a male with SSA could well become a fine priest. Gay friends I have had have said that their orientation has allowed them to love more completely, and they were not talking about the sexual expression of loving. Rather they were talking about having kind of a dual nature - a more developed masculine and feminine principle- that helped them relate to people. This would seem to be an excellent basis for pastoral care.
Exactly. Here the Vatican just leaves it at “deep-seated tendencies” which caused some problems. (It lacks the clarity and decisiveness Americans would like, but instead gives a general guideline each bishop can apply prudently.) A few days after this document, the WSJ had an editorial attacking the Church for banning all with SSA from the ministry. As far as I can see, Deep-seated tendencies would refer to someone who identifies himself as homosexual to the extent that:This is understood as a problem by the Church not an advantage. The relation of a priest to the laity is that of a spiritual father.
Instruction Concerning the Criteria for the Discernment of Vocations with Regard to Persons with Homosexual Tendencies in View of Their Admission to the Seminary and to Holy Orders
Congregation for Catholic Education
“Such persons, in fact, find themselves in a situation that gravely hinders them from relating correctly to men and women. One must in no way overlook the negative consequences that can derive from the ordination of persons with deep-seated homosexual tendencies.”
vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/ccatheduc/documents/rc_con_ccatheduc_doc_20051104_istruzione_en.html
Couldn’t some interpret “deep seated” as not being able to change or something. As in: if someone felt they could become heterosexual, or described themselves as “bisexual” these people might be eligible to the priesthood? Whereas people that felt SSA was a cross they would bear their entire lives might not be eligible, because it is deep seated?Exactly. Here the Vatican just leaves it at “deep-seated tendencies” which caused some problems. (It lacks the clarity and decisiveness Americans would like, but instead gives a general guideline each bishop can apply prudently.) A few days after this document, the WSJ had an editorial attacking the Church for banning all with SSA from the ministry. As far as I can see, Deep-seated tendencies would refer to someone who identifies himself as homosexual to the extent that:
a. the bishop / superior can’t trust he will remain chaste, or
b. his dealings with others are as a HOMOSEXUAL in a way that hinders his complete imagining of Christ as an Alter Christus.
It does not seem to ban all with SSA.
Those are my thoughts; I am by no means an expert.