S
Soulewolf
Guest
honestly i’m fairly upset with the way Abu and Charlemagne have handled themselves in this thread.Well, if you “get” Abu’s opinion, why did you feel the need to respond in a derogitory manner? Why respond at all if you have nothing new to offer, which is exactly what you have criticised Abu for? You have done exactly what you condemn him for doing. Not real clever mate.
Abu stated that twin studies disprove a prenatal biological factor in homosexuality.
I proved that they did indeed show that a prenatal biological factor was more than highly likely quoting twin study sources. this got ignored
Charlemagne asked about incest and underage sexual activity to which i responded with a very well put (in my opinion) answer in the form of political philosophy. Which can be seen in the post above this one. This too got ignored. I dont believe i should have to repeat myself.
There are many times when my responses to their questions have been completely ignored, then they go and post the same info over and over again. You can see why i’m perturbed by the situation no?
yes and yes. Though giving up is not the answer, approaching the situation from a new standpoint is.I’m sure Einstein, whom you quote, was referring to the carrying out of physical science experiments. Let’s apply your Einsteinian quote to say, parenting. Would you give up telling a child how to behave simply because after each telling they don’t comply? Or would a persistent parent responding to a recidivist child be “insane” according to your Einsteinian quote? Or what about a Policeman who constantly strives to get better behaviour from motorists, but the results never change and driver behaviour remains problematic. Is the Policeman “insane” because he keps trying, regardless of the results? Acording to you, he should give up or be considered insane!
well no. The first thing i tried was intelligent discussion. This got ignored so i tried a new way of doing things. Pretty simple.Well, here’s the rub. By your own self admission you live outside and against the morality of the Natural Moral Law. Along comes Abu with an alternate message and all you can do is mock. He does not mock you. He repeats the central core of what Natural Law morality tells us. You mock it. In the process you mock much of human history. In the process you mock what is the norm in human behaviour and has been considered so since time immemorial. Why do you do this? To assuage your own lifestyle perhaps? Because, according to the Natural Law it is perverse. The proofs have been given often enough in this thread and yet you seem detemined to ignore them and instead attempt a mocking defense of what is, according to the Natural Law, the indefensible.
He does mock me! He mocks my intelligence by ignoring what i have to say. by repeating info over and over again like hes trying to drill it into my head because he thinks i dont get it or something.
Now i’ve met christians on here who i like and who i respect for their views on life and the steadfast faith that they have. Abu and Charlemagne unfortunately do not fall into this group of peers.
Now i have to deal with your negativity and judgments on my character (which i dont much appreciate) because you do not understand the situation or how i feel.