A
Athanasius
Guest
I have a problem with scrupulosity. I tend to repeat sins in confession, because I remember more details that I forgot before when confessing before, and I have a hard time deciding what’s relevant, and what’s not, so I err on the side of caution by re-confessing them. I also remember things from my past that I don’t remember confessing to, so I confess to those. I think I strain my priest’s patience. It seems like it never ends, that my past keeps on haunting me. It has driven me crazy the past five years.
Anyway, recently my priest told me that from now on, I should only confess to sins from my last confession, even if I remember things from my past… He said that that was acceptable for scrupulous people. Is it all right for me to follow his advice? I already did it yesterday when I went to confession, but then I was thinking I should perhaps ask on here.
Looking into the book Understanding Scrupulosity, I saw contradictory advice:
On p. 41, Fr. Farnick makes the statement
“If we are certain we did not confess a serious sin of the past, we should do so at the time of confession”
However, on p. 37, Fr. Santa answered differently:
*Question: “If, after going to confession, you remember a sin you forgot to confess, should you go back to confession before you leave the church, or may you wait until your next confession?”
Answer. There is no need to go back to confession before you leave the church or to mention the sin in your next confession. Your sins are forgiven…"*
I’m so confused! Is it all right for me to simply follow what my priest said? Perhaps its the case that if the priest says its all right for a scrupulous person, then it is? It would help me out greatly if I could just forget my past once and for all, so I hope my priest’s statement is acceptable. May I follow what he said?
Anyway, recently my priest told me that from now on, I should only confess to sins from my last confession, even if I remember things from my past… He said that that was acceptable for scrupulous people. Is it all right for me to follow his advice? I already did it yesterday when I went to confession, but then I was thinking I should perhaps ask on here.
Looking into the book Understanding Scrupulosity, I saw contradictory advice:
On p. 41, Fr. Farnick makes the statement
“If we are certain we did not confess a serious sin of the past, we should do so at the time of confession”
However, on p. 37, Fr. Santa answered differently:
*Question: “If, after going to confession, you remember a sin you forgot to confess, should you go back to confession before you leave the church, or may you wait until your next confession?”
Answer. There is no need to go back to confession before you leave the church or to mention the sin in your next confession. Your sins are forgiven…"*
I’m so confused! Is it all right for me to simply follow what my priest said? Perhaps its the case that if the priest says its all right for a scrupulous person, then it is? It would help me out greatly if I could just forget my past once and for all, so I hope my priest’s statement is acceptable. May I follow what he said?
