Can Liberal Christianity Be Saved?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JustaServant
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
If someone believes in praying to God, pray to God. If someone doesn’t believe in abortion, don’t have an abortion. If someone doesn’t believe in gay marriage, don’t get married to a gay person. If someone doesn’t believe in contraception, don’t use birth control. And so on…

This is being faithful to one’s own faith, as one sincerely understands that faith.

There’s no requirement to claim the title of being “the one true Catholic”. There’s no requirement to tell other people their own faith is wrong. We are free to leave the job of being God to God. There’s a full time Pope on staff, we can let him worry about church politics and such.

Each of us already has enough our own very imperfect personal business to attend to, don’t we?
Typist,

This is Catholic Answers where you should be asking questions.

I could formulate some relevant questions for you however they would mean nothing to you. Your posting is an expose of your lack of understanding.

You might start with…

What is the difference between what I desribe as my Faith and Faith as you understand it?
 
Thanks for your reply CopticChristian, appreciate it.
All of these forms declare that the Truth comes from God…I am the way and the Truth and the Light…
It says…
I am the way and the Truth and the Light…
It doesn’t say…
Some human being’s words, opinions, translations, ever conflicting interpretations and holy books are the way and the Truth and the Light.
It says God is the way and the Truth and the Light.

Not us.

God.

If we have faith in God, there is no need for religion of any flavor. If we have faith in God, and we have a question, we don’t need to ask a priest, minister or holy book etc because…

We can ask God.

Why fool around with all the middlemen?

Do you think this post might be full of you know what? Ok, no problem. You could very well be right. Don’t take my word for it either. I agree! Just like all the other wanna be holy men, I’m nothing more than a highly imperfect very human typist with all kinds of personal weakness agendas. Don’t waste your time on me either. Move along, move along, there’s nothing to see here folks…

We can direct our questions all the way up the chain of command to the very top, to the Boss, cheerfully skipping over all the incompetent employees.

If we hear silence as the answer to our questions, we can have faith in God, we can have patience, and we can actually listen to that answer, instead of demanding another answer.

And anyway, we already know what we’re supposed to do, love each other. We could skip all the so very many questions and just get down to work on that. It’s not like we’ve run out of things to do.

If we have faith, we don’t need religion.
 
Thanks for your reply CopticChristian, appreciate it.

It says…

It doesn’t say…

It says God is the way and the Truth and the Light.

Not us.

God.

If we have faith in God, there is no need for religion of any flavor. If we have faith in God, and we have a question, we don’t need to ask a priest, minister or holy book etc because…

We can ask God.

Why fool around with all the middlemen?

Do you think this post might be full of you know what? Ok, no problem. You could very well be right. Don’t take my word for it either. I agree! Just like all the other wanna be holy men, I’m nothing more than a highly imperfect very human typist with all kinds of personal weakness agendas. Don’t waste your time on me either. Move along, move along, there’s nothing to see here folks…

We can direct our questions all the way up the chain of command to the very top, to the Boss, cheerfully skipping over all the incompetent employees.

If we hear silence as the answer to our questions, we can have faith in God, we can have patience, and we can actually listen to that answer, instead of demanding another answer.

And anyway, we already know what we’re supposed to do, love each other. We could skip all the so very many questions and just get down to work on that. It’s not like we’ve run out of things to do.

If we have faith, we don’t need religion.
Typist,

You have accepted the Protestant Paradigm…just me and Jesus…

I don’t need organized religion…it is just me and Jesus…I have Faith and that is my guide.

That is a good start…many Protestants find their way to Christ and the OHCAC with that first step…study the results of “me, Jesus and the Bible” and perhaps as you find your way from “me and God”…you will question “who is this God”…are you all alone like everyone else on this planet, then you may seek a Church…then you may need people with like minds…and when you join RCIA let me know…🙂
 
It is not your place, as someone who has no faith, to make this declaration.
Where did I say I don’t have faith? I don’t share your faith, that is true. But of course I don’t see your faith as “the faith”. You are free to do so of course.
And yet every church that proclaims the Nicaean Creed knows that “we believe in one holy catholic and apostolic church”.
Ok, everyone is free to choose human beings as mentors over God, there’s no law against it. I apologize for a measure of bombasticness, which is of course an argument with my own argument.
Jesus Christ Himself commanded His apostles and disciples to go out into the world and baptize all nations.
That’s what you think somebody who lived 2,000 years ago said. It could be true. Or maybe not. Or perhaps some combination of the two. So long as we are looking to human beings and their texts as our authority, this problem will remain.
That can’t happen without bringing them out of their false beliefs.
Which assumes that we, highly imperfect human beings with too many flaws to list here, know what correct beliefs are. Religion builds it’s house upon this flimsy foundation.
but don’t you dare tell them how to live their lives! God’s not about that, don’t you know… :rolleyes:
Wouldn’t God be capable of telling us how to live our lives without anybody else’s help? Why would an all powerful God require the services of a clergy class for his communications?
Religion or faith is not a matter of any individual’s personal business, though. The sacrifice of Christ that is at the center of our being and the cornerstone of our existence is for the salvation of the entire world.
What I see is that everything that’s been created is then destroyed. That could change of course, but so far, that’s been the pattern, in every single instance, for billions of years.

Personally, I prefer to read what a creator is actually doing, rather than read what somebody says he’s doing. Just my personal choice, that’s all.
 
Ok, everyone is free to choose human beings as mentors over God, there’s no law against it. I apologize for a measure of bombasticness, which is of course an argument with my own argument.
And, of course, you have a direct line to God without any human intervention. May I ask where you even heard of God? Was it from another human being, perhaps?
That’s what you think somebody who lived 2,000 years ago said. It could be true. Or maybe not. Or perhaps some combination of the two. So long as we are looking to human beings and their texts as our authority, this problem will remain.
As Christians we believe that our Sacred Scriptures are the word of God, not of human beings. Yes, human beings put pen to paper, but under the inspiration and guidance of the Almighty God. So this may be a problem for you, but not to those of us who believe.
Which assumes that we, highly imperfect human beings with too many flaws to list here, know what correct beliefs are. Religion builds it’s house upon this flimsy foundation.
You are exactly right. Highly imperfect human beings with too man flaws to list are really pretty lost on their own. This would include you, which places your opinion here in the same category as those you are bemoaning. This is why it required God to reveal himself to us and he did this by becoming man himself. And he did not build his Church on a flimsy foundation of human opinion, but rather on the solid foundation of rock.
Wouldn’t God be capable of telling us how to live our lives without anybody else’s help? Why would an all powerful God require the services of a clergy class for his communications?
God is capable of telling us anything he wants to tell us. What he has told us is that he wants us to be a part of his family, which is the Church. He has never told us that he wants us to be solitary beings who have no need for anyone else’s help. We are here to help each other; to feed the poor, clothe the naked, heal the sick, visit those in prison, etc…
What I see is that everything that’s been created is then destroyed. That could change of course, but so far, that’s been the pattern, in every single instance, for billions of years.
That has been the case since the sin of our first parents. Christ came to change that; to give us eternal life and a glorified body which will never suffer decay. There will be a new heaven and a new earth which will never pass away.
Personally, I prefer to read what a creator is actually doing, rather than read what somebody says he’s doing. Just my personal choice, that’s all.
And where can I find this book about what the creator is actually doing instead of reading what someone says he’s doing. I can’t wait to read it. Was this written by God or did he use a human being to write it?
 
The operative word above is “believe.” Liberal Christians believe they are following Christ by following their feelings, desires, urges and passions. They base their feelings upon…THEIR FEELINGS.

You are right, I believe that I am trying to follow Christ, based on His Word, rather than my feelings. Sometimes His Word is in opposition to my feelings, passions and desires. Do I follow my feelings or the Word of God? Hopefully the latter.

One path is based on moral relativism and the other upon God’s Word, thousands of years of tradition, and the Magisterium. But for some unfathomable reason Liberal Christians think they know much more than anyone in the past. Somehow they know gay “marriage” is fine, that abortion is fine…as long as it comports with their feelings on the subject.

I don’t know about you CMatt but I suspect my feelings are rather inferior to thousands of years of thought and wisdom that points to a different path.

Lisa
You are correct for sure on one thing Lisa. The operative word is indeed “believe”. Amen to that. Liberal Christians believe they are following Christ and God’s word based on their faith and indeed you also believe, and as you said hope, you are following Christ and God’s word. You believe you are doing so by placing your faith in Catholic interpretation of Scripture, of history, and place your faith in the Magisterium. Others of faith believe differently than you do. We can each believe and think we know the truth and certainly Catholics on CAF believe they know. But the truth is we shall only know with 100% absolute certainty the one ultimate truth if in faith as we both believe, He shall come again. In the meantime we only walk by faith not by sight and God bless you and all who journey in faith with him. Peace.
 
Where did I say I don’t have faith?
You have listed your faith as “Agnostic”, meaning, I take it, that you do not subscribe to any particular faith tradition. Whatever you have faith in is not anything recognizable to anyone outside your own head. The more you post, the more it sounds like you only have faith in yourself.
Ok, everyone is free to choose human beings as mentors over God,
Indeed. You’ve done it, and you’re far from the first to come in with this “faith in nothing in particular, NOT religion” idea.
That’s what you think somebody who lived 2,000 years ago said. It could be true. Or maybe not. Or perhaps some combination of the two. So long as we are looking to human beings and their texts as our authority, this problem will remain.
God entrusted His church to human beings. I think God knew what He was doing.
Which assumes that we, highly imperfect human beings with too many flaws to list here, know what correct beliefs are. Religion builds it’s house upon this flimsy foundation.
Apparently you missed my earlier post on the difference between what you presume to be religion’s foundation (man’s claims), and religion’s actual foundation (direct revelation of God). Contrasting our strong faith in God with your “maybe it’s this, but maybe it’s that” inability to take a firm stand on anything (other than the fact that you like “faith”, not religion…but apparently not enough to pick a particular faith out of the many faiths that exist) doesn’t really make it clear how it is religion that is built on a flimsy foundation. It makes it sound like you’re projecting. We are built on the rock that is Christ.
Wouldn’t God be capable of telling us how to live our lives without anybody else’s help? Why would an all powerful God require the services of a clergy class for his communications?
Yes, and why wasn’t God incarnate as that lovely talking pug from the “Men in Black” movie? Everybody would’ve loved that. And why doesn’t God go to the UN and make a speech there that will end all the conflicts in the world, since all will of course naturally recognize His authority (since we don’t need anyone else to help us do that)? And why do good things happen to bad people?

Respect God’s prerogatives as God. “For My thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways My ways.” (Isaiah 55:8)
What I see is that everything that’s been created is then destroyed. That could change of course, but so far, that’s been the pattern, in every single instance, for billions of years.
Personally, I prefer to read what a creator is actually doing, rather than read what somebody says he’s doing. Just my personal choice, that’s all.
This is a complete non sequitor. It has nothing to do with your original contention that “we have enough personal business to attend to”, and my response that religion is not a matter of personal business.
 
If we hear silence as the answer to our questions, we can have faith in God, we can have patience, and we can actually listen to that answer, instead of demanding another answer.

And anyway, we already know what we’re supposed to do, love each other. We could skip all the so very many questions and just get down to work on that. It’s not like we’ve run out of things to do.

If we have faith, we don’t need religion.
Typist, welcome to the non Catholic forum. This reminded me of something a former Roman priest now Episcopal priest once told me, “If we open ourselves up to God’s spirit, we will know in what way God is calling us to go”. God bless you Typist along your journey. You sound as if you believe one of the greatest commandments is to love your neighbor. Jesus taught the same. Peace be with you.
 
You are correct for sure on one thing Lisa. The operative word is indeed “believe”. Amen to that. Liberal Christians believe they are following Christ and God’s word based on their faith and indeed you also believe, and as you said hope, you are following Christ and God’s word. You believe you are doing so by placing your faith in Catholic interpretation of Scripture, of history, and place your faith in the Magisterium. Others of faith believe differently than you do. We can each believe and think we know the truth and certainly Catholics on CAF believe they know. But the truth is we shall only know with 100% absolute certainty the one ultimate truth if in faith as we both believe, He shall come again. In the meantime we only walk by faith not by sight and God bless you and all who journey in faith with him. Peace.
CMatt call me ever so practical but I think basing my faith on the words of Jesus, passed onto the Rock onto which His church was to be built, followed by 2000 years of incredible intellectual effort, tradition and the Apostolic Succession seems to have a firmer foundation than basing everything on current culture.

Liberal Christians believe they are following Christ by following their personal desires, passions and agendas. When it is pointed out that their support of such acts as abortion or same sex marriage has absolutely no basis in Scripture or tradition or wisdom of the ages, they punt and say “God is love…” therefore I can do whatever I want. To each his own CMatt. But don’t wonder why liberal Christianity has become an oxymoron.

Lisa
 
And anyway, we already know what we’re supposed to do, love each other. We could skip all the so very many questions and just get down to work on that. It’s not like we’ve run out of things to do.
What do you mean by the phrase “love each other”? How is the general CAF membership failing in this regard?
 
CMatt call me ever so practical but I think basing my faith on the words of Jesus, passed onto the Rock onto which His church was to be built, followed by 2000 years of incredible intellectual effort, tradition and the Apostolic Succession seems to have a firmer foundation than basing everything on current culture.

Liberal Christians believe they are following Christ by following their personal desires, passions and agendas. When it is pointed out that their support of such acts as abortion or same sex marriage has absolutely no basis in Scripture or tradition or wisdom of the ages, they punt and say “God is love…” therefore I can do whatever I want. To each his own CMatt. But don’t wonder why liberal Christianity has become an oxymoron.

Lisa
Brilliant statements about chosing Truth over feelings,Lisa!👍 I posted earlier that it is the duty of faithful Catholics to admonish sinners according to the corporal acts of mercy. It is not very Christian like therefore to bless someone in their sin and say"I love you" and go on your way.
It would be like a parent watching their child doing something harmful. and just standing by. The parent who truely loves thier child steps in and stops the harmful behavior. We all must humbly submit to what is “healthy” for our souls and listen to it is that what will provide the sure way to God.
 
You have accepted the Protestant Paradigm…just me and Jesus… I don’t need organized religion…it is just me and Jesus…I have Faith and that is my guide.
I take your point and generally agree with your analysis, but it’s gone much farther than that for me personally.

I see thought itself as the primary obstacle obstructing the communication, and once one has that perspective, all religions, ideologies, opinions, theories, most especially my own, are seen as the problem, not the solution.

As you can see, I have plenty of work to do, and you guys being so interesting just isn’t helping one little bit. 🙂
 
Typist, welcome to the non Catholic forum.
Thank you for your welcome.
This reminded me of something a former Roman priest now Episcopal priest once told me, “If we open ourselves up to God’s spirit, we will know in what way God is calling us to go”.
He sounds like a wise man.

We might add that we may not always know which way to go. We may ask, and not hear an answer. We may hear only silence.

If we don’t have faith, we may judge the conversation a failure, and may go running off in search of another answer from someone else. A book, a priest, the church, something, anything.

If we do have faith, we may trust the dialog, listen to the silence we’ve been given in reply, and take the time to learn from it.

When I was about 14 I was surfing one day, by myself. A storm came up and so I went and sat on somebody’s porch to wait it out.

I got bored after awhile, and so just for the heck of it, asked God for a sign. You know, the so very typical question. God if you’re there, give me a sign.

So I waited. And I waited. It’s still raining. Waited some more. And more.

Nothing. Nothing at all. No sign whatsoever. Not a thing. So I shrugged it off and went back to surfing.

It’s almost 50 years later now, and I don’t remember a single other thing about that day, that week, that month. No memory of anything at all from that period, not even how good the surf was that day. No memories, except those few minutes when I asked that question, and received the silent answer.
God bless you Typist along your journey.
Thank you much, and the same to you.
 
Thank you for your welcome.

He sounds like a wise man.

We might add that we may not always know which way to go. We may ask, and not hear an answer. We may hear only silence.

If we don’t have faith, we may judge the conversation a failure, and may go running off in search of another answer from someone else. A book, a priest, the church, something, anything.

If we do have faith, we may trust the dialog, listen to the silence we’ve been given in reply, and take the time to learn from it.

When I was about 14 I was surfing one day, by myself. A storm came up and so I went and sat on somebody’s porch to wait it out.

I got bored after awhile, and so just for the heck of it, asked God for a sign. You know, the so very typical question. God if you’re there, give me a sign.

So I waited. And I waited. It’s still raining. Waited some more. And more.

Nothing. Nothing at all. No sign whatsoever. Not a thing. So I shrugged it off and went back to surfing.

It’s almost 50 years later now, and I don’t remember a single other thing about that day, that week, that month. No memory of anything at all from that period, not even how good the surf was that day. No memories, except those few minutes when I asked that question, and received the silent answer.

Thank you much, and the same to you.
The smallest board I used was a 7 foot 6 inch board…It was called the Dewey Weber spoon…then I had a Bing…called it the Blue Cigar…9 foot 6…good Board…I was at Malibu and one of those professionals kicked me off a wave…forgot his name…some of my best memories are getting up and being in the water at around 5, wet suit and all…and after several hours stopping at McDonalds…on the way home…15 cent burgers, 10 cent fries…lots of memories…
 
Instead of dismissing what I wrote, please explain how I’ve concluded incorrectly.
If you can’t accept that people can sincerely be Catholic AND disagree with some of it’s teachings, then there’s nothing more to say.
 
If you can’t accept that people can sincerely be Catholic AND disagree with some of it’s teachings, then there’s nothing more to say.
We must be operating under different notions of hypocrisy, then. 🤷
 
What does it mean to be Roman Catholic if not to agree with the teachings of that particular church?
 
What does it mean to be Roman Catholic if not to agree with the teachings of that particular church?
Perhaps some Catholics see the church as being something other than whatever the clergy currently installed in Rome at any given point in time says it is?

Why should Catholics necessarily automatically follow the interpretations of a group of leaders they had no role in selecting?

What if somebody you really don’t agree with should be selected as the leadership the next time, will you change your view to match theirs?

Maybe some see the clergy as advisers, instead of rulers?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top