Can non-catholics receive communion if

  • Thread starter Thread starter workinprogress8
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
W

workinprogress8

Guest
Can non-Catholics receive the Eucharist if they believe the bread is truly the body of Christ and the wine in truly the blood of Christ?

I never used to think that non-Catholics could receive Catholic communion, but someone told me they could, so I thought I’d ask here. Thanks! 🙂
 
No. A person must be properly taught in the catholic faith and must have been to first reconciliation before receiving first communion. Part of this process is also a public profession of faith.

They would of course now be catholic.
 
work(name removed by moderator)rogress8:
Can non-Catholics receive the Eucharist if they believe the bread is truly the body of Christ and the wine in truly the blood of Christ?

I never used to think that non-Catholics could receive Catholic communion, but someone told me they could, so I thought I’d ask here. Thanks! 🙂
No, they must be Catholic, with no grevious sin, in order to receive the Holy Eucharist.

Blessings,
Shannin
 
There are a few cases where a non-Catholic can receive communion. They are all spelled out in Canon law.

A person that is in a church that has valid communion recognized by the Catholic church (i.e. Orthodox, Polish National, etc.) can receive in the Catholic church BUT they are supposed to abide by the laws as they apply to their own church.

A Christian that the above does not apply to is allowed to receive communion in the cases of danger of death or grave necessity.
“In cases of danger of death or grave necessity, Catholic ministers may (by the permission of their conference of bishops) give the Eucharist to Protestant Christians who (a) cannot approach a minister of their own community, (b) who ask for the sacraments, (c) who share the Church’s faith concerning the Eucharist, and (d) are properly disposed to receiving it (CIC 844:4).”
Code:
A non-Christian is never permitted to receive communion.
If you go to a church that has missals in pews, the complete quidelines are usually printed there.
 
Finally found it, the US Conference of Catholic Bishops published the following guidelines for who can receive the Eucharist.

Link
 
40.png
RichT:
No. A person must be properly taught in the catholic faith and must have been to first reconciliation before receiving first communion. Part of this process is also a public profession of faith.

They would of course now be catholic.
Actually, if you are an adult coming into the Church, you can receive Baptism and Confirmation directly before first Communion. This works because Baptism removes all prior sins in addition to original sin.

Peace
 
Thanks for all of your responses. They have been very helpful.

I have another question though, one of my teachers at a Catholic High school, is telling us that is the case. And practically encouraging those who aren’t Catholic to recieve if they truly believe in the presence.

Please help me with this situation.
Thank you so much! 🙂
 
work(name removed by moderator)rogress8:
I have another question though, one of my teachers at a Catholic High school, is telling us that is the case. And practically encouraging those who aren’t Catholic to recieve if they truly believe in the presence.

Please help me with this situation.
Thank you so much! 🙂
Show him the Missal.

Your teacher may be saying this because there has been an eccentric custom of inviting non-Catholics to receive the Sacrament at such events as weddings and funerals. This is, to my mind, just plain confusing. But it HAS been done, and that may be where your teacher got the idea.
 
40.png
mercygate:
Show him the Missal.

Your teacher may be saying this because there has been an eccentric custom of inviting non-Catholics to receive the Sacrament at such events as weddings and funerals. This is, to my mind, just plain confusing. But it HAS been done, and that may be where your teacher got the idea.
Great idea, but how do I approach this? Do I just bluntly say, look at the missal? I’d really like to say this in the most non-offensive way, maybe even anonymously, becuase I still have the class next semester.

Thank you! 🙂
 
work(name removed by moderator)rogress8:
Great idea, but how do I approach this? Do I just bluntly say, look at the missal? I’d really like to say this in the most non-offensive way, maybe even anonymously, becuase I still have the class next semester.

Thank you! 🙂
Hm. The age-old question. Well, how about a note saying:

Dear Mr. Teacher,

I was puzzled by your saying that non-Catholics should receive Communion in the Catholic Church if they believe in the Real Presence of Christ, because I was leafing through the Missal before Mass the other day and saw this instruction about who may receive the Eucharist in the Catholic Church. Since I thought I might be confused, I went to the U. S. Conference of Catholic Bishops web site, and found this article [don’t give him the link; print out the article]. usccb.org/liturgy/q%26a/mass/communion.shtml

Sincerely,
work(name removed by moderator)rogress8

.
 
That’s a really good idea. Now that I’m on Christmas break I’ll have to wait until school gets back in session, if it comes up again. Thank you so much!
 
work(name removed by moderator)rogress8:
Can non-Catholics receive the Eucharist if they believe the bread is truly the body of Christ and the wine in truly the blood of Christ?

I never used to think that non-Catholics could receive Catholic communion, but someone told me they could, so I thought I’d ask here. Thanks! 🙂
Only under specific circumstances. If they could not find a minister of their own faith and freely ask for the Sacraments and the Catholic priest has spoken with the Catholic Bishop about the specific situation and granted his permission.
 
catholic-ew.org.uk/resource/obob/obob03.htm

95 The Directory strongly recommends that each diocesan bishop should establish norms for judging situations of grave and pressing spiritual need when Christians not in full communion with the Catholic Church may be admitted to Holy Communion and to the sacraments of Reconciliation and Anointing of the Sick. These norms should take into account any which may have been established already by the Bishops’ Conference. In the absence of norms established either by the diocesan bishop or by the Bishops’ Conference, Catholic priests are to follow those of the Directory. In order to guide Catholic pastors in our countries, our Bishops’ Conferences now establish norms on this important matter. There are two sets of norms: one concerning Christians from Eastern Churches, the other concerning Christians from Churches and ecclesial communities of the West. Catholic priests are to discern each individual case only in accord with the norms established by their diocesan bishop, or, in the absence of such diocesan norms, those which the Bishops’ Conferences of England and Wales, Ireland, and Scotland promulgate in this document, each for its own territory.

96 According to the teaching of the Second Vatican Council, the doctrine that ‘common worship’ should signify the unity of the Church generally rules out sacramental sharing, but the gaining of grace may sometimes commend it

112 What might be meant by other unique occasions for joy or sorrow in the life of a family or an individual? These are situations in which there may be an objectively grave and pressing spiritual need for a person to receive Holy Communion. We give examples of such circumstances, without in any way intending to suggest categories of situations in which admission to the sacrament would be generally granted. The admission of a particular individual on one such unique occasion does not mean that another individual would necessarily be admitted in a similar situation. Requests to be admitted to Holy Communion may come from the parent of a child to be baptised during Mass, or receiving First Holy Communion or Confirmation; the parent or wife of someone being ordained;210 the intimate family of the deceased at a Funeral Mass; Christians who cannot easily approach a minister of their own community, such as those confined to an institution of some kind, although most hospitals and prisons in our countries have Anglican, Presbyterian, Church of Scotland and Free Church chaplains who minister there on a regular basis. There may be occasions when it is admission to the sacraments of Reconciliation and Anointing of the Sick which is the most grave and pressing spiritual need, due in part to the absence of such sacramental rites in some faith communities. Each situation will be judged individually according to the norms.

ctd
 
113 Who is to make the decision in each case? Except when there is a danger of death, it is for the diocesan bishop or those delegated by him to judge whether there is a grave and pressing need. When an individual Christian decides, after prayer and reflection, that he or she should approach the local priest about their circumstances, the latter must also make a discernment about whether this should be brought to the local bishop or his delegate for a decision. A Catholic priest may not make such a decision himself unless duly delegated by his bishop.

114 What conditions must always be fulfilled? The Code of Canon Law lists four conditions which are re-stated in the Directory:211

• that the person be unable to approach a minister of his or her own community for the sacrament desired;

In our countries, occasions when such fellow Christians cannot physically find a minister of their own community will be rare. There may be times, however, such as in the particular circumstances or on the unique occasions exemplified above, when access to one’s own minister is impossible given the very nature of that occasion.

• that the person greatly desire to receive the sacrament, and ask to receive it of his or her own initiative;

The grave and pressing spiritual need should be something discerned by the person concerned, rather than in response to an invitation given by the Catholic priest. Priests and other Catholic ministers should issue neither general nor specific invitations to other Christians to receive Holy Communion. It is important that there be adequate time for the proper process of discernment and judgement, and for appropriate preparation for reception of the sacrament.

• that the person manifest Catholic faith in the sacrament desired; In our countries, occasions when such fellow Christians cannot physically find a minister of their own community will be rare. There may be times, however, such as in the particular circumstances or on the unique occasions exemplified above, when access to one’s own minister is impossible given the very nature of that occasion.

• that the person greatly desire to receive the sacrament, and ask to receive it of his or her own initiative;

The grave and pressing spiritual need should be something discerned by the person concerned, rather than in response to an invitation given by the Catholic priest. Priests and other Catholic ministers should issue neither general nor specific invitations to other Christians to receive Holy Communion. It is important that there be adequate time for the proper process of discernment and judgement, and for appropriate preparation for reception of the sacrament.

• that the person manifest Catholic faith in the sacrament desired;

In this document we have given an outline of the fundamental aspects of Catholic faith in the Eucharist, and to a lesser extent of Catholic faith in the sacraments of Reconciliation and Anointing of the Sick. For a Christian who does not regularly worship at a Catholic church, being a frequent communicant at his or her own church may well indicate a love for the Eucharist. Others may regularly attend a Catholic celebration of the Eucharist, with their Catholic spouse or family for example, and this may speak loudly of a commitment to the Eucharist. It does not necessarily follow, however, that their understanding of the Eucharist and its implications is in harmony with that of the Catholic faith.

• that the person be properly disposed.

The same is asked of a Christian not in full communion with the Catholic Church as is expected of a Catholic wishing to receive the sacraments. There are Catholics who are unable to receive Holy Communion because of their being, for example, in a state of serious sin or in an irregular marital situation; the same may be true of another Christian seeking admission to Holy Communion.

I’m sure the US Bishops position is broadly similar.
 
I’ve often wondered whether a mixed marriage can be a de facto example of “grave and pressing need” – particularly if the non-Catholic spouse has a Catholic understanding of the Eucharist, is properly disposed, etc.

Since “the two have become one flesh,” where should the “one flesh” receive its nourishment?
 
40.png
Erich:
I’ve often wondered whether a mixed marriage can be a de facto example of “grave and pressing need” – particularly if the non-Catholic spouse has a Catholic understanding of the Eucharist, is properly disposed, etc.

Since “the two have become one flesh,” where should the “one flesh” receive its nourishment?
Wonder no further. The answer is no. Observe,

PONTIFICIUM CONSILIUM AD CHRISTIANORUM UNITATEM FOVENDAM
***DIRECTORY FOR THE APPLICATION OF ***
PRINCIPLES AND NORMS ON ECUMENISM
vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/chrstuni/documents/rc_pc_chrstuni_doc_25031993_principles-and-norms-on-ecumenism_en.html

Under the heading, “Mixed Marriages”:
  1. Although the spouses in a mixed marriage share the sacraments of baptism and marriage, Eucharistic sharing can only be exceptional and in each case the norms stated above concerning the admission of a non-Catholic Christian to Eucharistic communion (Cf. nn. 125, 130 and 131 above), as well as those concerning the participation of a Catholic in Eucharistic communion in another Church (Cf. n. 132 above), must be observed.
 
If a non-Catholic Christian attempts to receive communion in a Catholic Church because he believes in the Real Presence, what is the basis of his belief? If he rejects the authority of the Catholic Church to teach, preach and sanctify, he also rejects its authority to ordain bishops, who ordain priests, to confect the Eucharist. If he rejects the authority by which the priest receives the power to confect the Eucharist, by definition he rejects the notion that anything sacramental occurs in those words and actions. Therefore, he can say that he believes Christ is present in the Eucharist, because he has rejected the mechanism by which that sacramental presence is made possible.
 
40.png
puzzleannie:
If a non-Catholic Christian attempts to receive communion in a Catholic Church because he believes in the Real Presence, what is the basis of his belief?
I was really only thinking of Lutherans and high-church Anglicans/Episcopalians as “likely believers” in the Real Presence. Lutherans (at least, all the ones I know… my wife is ELCA Lutheran) and high-church Anglicans/Episcopalians already believe that their Eucharistic elements, while physically bread and wine, also somehow contain Christ’s body and blood (and, presumably, His soul and divinity, since these infuse His body and blood); but after the service Christ is no longer present (at least this is what the Lutherans I know believe… I can’t speak for Anglicans/Episcopalians).

I agree that without a ministerial priesthood passed on through the apostolic succession of bishops there is no consecration. But I can’t imagine that my telling my in-laws that their Eucharist is “defective” because of this lack of a ministerial priesthood would get me very far :rolleyes:
 
It is a different philosophical situation if they are receiving communion in their own church, from their own ministers. If we are discussing their reception of communion in a Catholic Church, I return to the matter of authority. If they reject the authority of Catholic priests to confect the sacrament (not touching on the supposed authority of their own ministers) they reject the sacrament and its effects.
 
I found the bishops’ link and would be obliged if someone could tell me what possible **grave reason ** could exist which would permit someone to receive Holy Communion while not in the state of grace. :mad: I was taught to make a spiritual communion if not in the state of grace.

*A person who is conscious of grave sin is not to receive the Body and Blood of the Lord without prior sacramental confession except for a *grave reason ** where there is no opportunity for confession
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top