Can one be a Christian AND a Muslim??

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mimi
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The following is an excerpt:

What is Islam: Islam is not simply the name of a religion, the followers of which are called Muslims. The word ‘Islam’ is an arabic word which in relation to religion means submission. In simple words Islam means submission to God and to follow the instructions conveyed by the Prophet of one’s time e.g.Islam at the time of Abrahim (peace be upon him) was to obey the orders of God and to follow the instructions of the Prophet Abrahim (p.b.u.h). Islam at the time of Moses (peace be upon him) was to obey the orders of God and to follow the instructions of the Prophet Moses (p.b.u.h). Islam at the time of Jesus (peace be upon him) was to obey the orders of God and to follow the instructions of the Prophet Jesus (p.b.u.h). In the same manner, Islam after the arrival of the last Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is to obey the orders of God and to follow the instructions of the Prophet Muhammad (p.b.u.h).

Who is a Muslim: Muslim is not a name of a particular group but an arabic word for one who submits to the concept of Islam (as mentioned above), also known as ‘Believers’ e.g. In the era of Prophet Moses (p.b.u.h), people who followed him, believed in all the Prophets and Revelations before him and obeyed the orders of God were Muslims. In the era of Prophet Jesus (p.b.u.h), people who followed him, believed in all the Prophets and Revelations before him and obeyed the orders of God were Muslims. In the same manner, after the arrival of the last Prophet Muhammad (p.b.u.h), people who follow him, believe in all the Prophets and Revelations before him and obey the orders of God are known as Muslims.

Who is a Non-Muslim: Those who do not submit to the concept of Islam are known as Non-Muslims or Disbelievers e.g. The followers of Moses (p.b.u.h) were Muslims when they followed him and obeyed the orders of God, but when some of them denied the prophet-hood of Jesus (p.b.u.h) who came after Moses (p.b.u.h) and whatever was revealed upon him, they fell in the category of non-muslims, as they breached the concept of Islam. Those who accepted Jesus (p.b.u.h) and what was revealed upon him, remained Muslims. Similarly the followers of Jesus (p.b.u.h) were Muslims when they followed him and obeyed the orders of God, but when some of them denied the prophet-hood of Muhammad (p.b.u.h) who came after Jesus (p.b.u.h) and the revelation which he brought, they fell in the category of non-muslims, as they breached the concept of Islam. Those who accepted Muhammad (p.b.u.h) and the revelation which he brouhgt, remained Muslims. In the same manner the followers of Muhammad (p.b.u.h) are Muslims since they follow him and obey the orders of God, but if they deny the prophet-hood of any Prophet before Muhammad (p.b.u.h) whether it is of Jesus (p.b.u.h), Moses (p.b.u.h) or any other, or deny any of the previous Revelations, or give the status of Prophet to anyone after the last Prophet Muhammad (p.b.u.h) then they will fall in the category of non-muslims due to breaching the concept of Islam.
**Note**: Prophet Muhammad (p.b.u.h) was the last Prophet in the religion of Islam because he declared that he is the last Prophet and that there will be no prophet after him. On the other hand Jesus (p.b.u.h) was not the last Prophet because he did not declare that he is the last one and neither warned that there will ne no prophet after him. Infact he told his followers that there will be a Prophet after him whose name will be Ahmad, which is the second name of Muhammad (p.b.u.h).
 
The following is an excerpt:

Note: Prophet Muhammad (p.b.u.h) was the last Prophet in the religion of Islam because he declared that he is the last Prophet and that there will be no prophet after him. On the other hand Jesus (p.b.u.h) was not the last Prophet because he did not declare that he is the last one and neither warned that there will ne no prophet after him. Infact he told his followers that there will be a Prophet after him whose name will be Ahmad, which is the second name of Muhammad (p.b.u.h).
  1. Jesus was not a prophet , He was the Son of God
  2. Jesus never said there would be a Prophet after him. more ot less call him Ahmed.
  3. The fact that Mohamed said there would be no Prophet after him is like me saying there will be no Pope after Benedict XVI-I can say it all I wantbut that doesnt make it true.
 
  1. Jesus was not a prophet , He was the Son of God
  2. Jesus never said there would be a Prophet after him. more ot less call him Ahmed.
  3. The fact that Mohamed said there would be no Prophet after him is like me saying there will be no Pope after Benedict XVI-I can say it all I wantbut that doesnt make it true.
Estesbob, are you saying there will be a prophet after Mohamed?
 
Estesbob, are you saying there will be a prophet after Mohamed?
I think he as saying that Muhammad claiming that he was the last prophet is meaningless since muhammad had no authority of any kind
 
I think he as saying that Muhammad claiming that he was the last prophet is meaningless since muhammad had no authority of any kind
True. I mean no offense but he (Muhammad) may have been a philosopher but he was not a prophet of God nor is the God he propogated the God of the bible and hence is not the TRUE God.

I think we should respect Islam as one of the World’s faiths as we should Taoism, Hindusim and so on. All are striving for truth and there are many good and noble people among these faiths.

The Pope pointed out some flaws in some of the philosophy of certain Muslims and correctly so. I think the reason it caused so much of a stir was that it hit too close to home for many Muslims.

Rev North
 
In a word, NO. In effect, that would be like trying to graft an orange-tree sapling onto an apple-tree stump (or vice-versa).
 
I would say that, like all conversion experiences (and this seems to be one to me), it is complex. I do have to say, though, that when I was attending an Episcopal Church and came to the realization that I did not believe in the divinity of Jesus nor had I ever truly done so, I ceased calling myself a Christian and left the church.
For which, I thank you. Your action was a reasoned one. I don’t agree with you, but I respect you for your honesty.
Holmes’ action, on the other hand, appears to me to, not only defy reason, but to be unethical in the extreme.
As for her bishop…🤷 🤷 🤷
 
For which, I thank you. Your action was a reasoned one. I don’t agree with you, but I respect you for your honesty.
Holmes’ action, on the other hand, appears to me to, not only defy reason, but to be unethical in the extreme.
As for her bishop…🤷 🤷 🤷
My question is: Why would one even want to be both Christian and Muslim if this is hypothetically even possible?

One claims Christ to be Man/God

The other only claims that Christ a good and just prophet.

Anyway as a Christian I have to reason this way:
Why would the Father send His only Begotten Son to be Incarnate, preach, heal, raise Lazarus from the dead, suffer, die, and rise from dead if in the back of His mind he had someone else,( a mere mortal at that) begin another belief system that would replace all the ground work for Christianity? Quite simply He didnt. Muslimism is a man made faith plain and simple. Its a fraud perpetrated on the beduins first, then the middle east and finally the world. Read the life of Muhammed and see whether or not this man with all his baggage even deserves veneration let alone some following.
 
My question is: Why would one even want to be both Christian and Muslim if this is hypothetically even possible?

.
She’s Episcopalean, thats why. You can strive to be anythng and believe preety much anything and your Church will back you up.
 
A gnostic encompasses all religion, primarily with Christianity at its center, after all it was Christ who taught us to free ourselves from Dogma and Doctrine to cling to the bosom of universal truths such as the sermon on the mount. The symbolism of Christianity also serves Gnostic’s hope of being free from evil at the heart of all physical matter on the earth, as Christ said, the flesh is weak.
 
According to the article that Maratom linked, the Muslipalian has had her collar yanked, at least for one year. So that’s something:

*The Rev. Ann Holmes Redding, a local Episcopal priest who announced she is both Muslim and Christian, will not be able to serve as a priest for a year, according to her bishop.

During that year, Redding is expected to “reflect on the doctrines of the Christian faith, her vocation as a priest, and what I see as the conflicts inherent in professing both Christianity and Islam,” the Rt. Rev. Geralyn Wolf, bishop of the Diocese of Rhode Island, wrote in an e-mail to Episcopal Church leaders.

Redding was ordained more than 20 years ago by the then-bishop of Rhode Island, and it is that diocese that has disciplinary authority over her.
*
 
Good!! looks like her Bishop finally came to his senses…

“Episcopal priest or Muslim? Redding will have a year to think about it”
I think she’ll have to settle being merely an Episcopal layperson and Muslim.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top