B
bzkoss236
Guest
Just as women cannot be the biological fathers of their biological children, neither can women be spiritual fathers to their spiritual children.
They know Jesus gave the Church real power and the keys to the Kingdom … and that what the Church binds and looses on Earth is bound and loosed in heaven.Why do people who aren’t part of the Church care what the Church does? Makes no sense to me.![]()
It’s a reasoned rule. It was not declared ex cathedra, that is, asserting papal infallibly, but I think it does fall under the Church’s infallible teaching authority, although I’m not a theologian to say so definitively. Here is what Pope John Paul said:Right. God/the Holy Spirit can change the doctrine.
We have seen some teachings, traditions and laws from the past change…the laws on food and circumcision, for example, which both came from God (right?) and then changed 2000 years later. Teachings that adulterers should be stoned to death…that one changed. And others.
Re the rule on female ordination, how did the magisterium decide this one again?
Since as far as we know, Jesus is never quoted as saying this rule to anyone…did Peter and the others just pass it along to others that, “because Jesus picked us and we are men, there can only have male priests/popes for the rest of eternity,” and that’s how it came to be?
Or,
Did the Holy Spirit-God speak to someone specific out loud and and* tell* them this must be the case? (and if so, who? And when? I assume it would be recorded somewhere?)
God works in mysterious ways. To presume he can’t do something or change something would be…wrong, would it not?
All the things you mentioned were under the old covenant. The covenant we are now under is the “new and everlasting covenant.” I would not expect that an everlasting covenant can/will be changed.The Old Law was fulfilled by Christ, thus we can eat pork, don’t stone women or men for adultery, and do not need to perform circumcision.
It was Christ, who is God, that fulfilled these laws, and ended these requirements, NOT a decree by the Church. The Church has not the authority to change the priesthood God (God the Son) chose to help shepard his Church.
And yes… as Catholic we believe in a Tradition that has been handed down throughout the centuries…
Haven’t you picked this up being in the forums as long as you have?
Here is an example:What secular media? Is there a news story I missed? Since there is no link per forum rules and I have not come across anything like this in the media, I seriously doubt the premise of this post.
Even Bill Maher is frustrated with all the positive coverage of Pope Francis in the secular press. If that man’s complaining, you know something good is happening!
God Bless Pope Francis!
Of course she has. She knows the answer. Sometimes people just ask questions either hopinh somehow they’lll get a different answer, or because it allows them to indirectly state their opinion about that which they know is set in stone.The Old Law was fulfilled by Christ, thus we can eat pork, don’t stone women or men for adultery, and do not need to perform circumcision.
It was Christ, who is God, that fulfilled these laws, and ended these requirements, NOT a decree by the Church. The Church has not the authority to change the priesthood God (God the Son) chose to help shepard his Church.
And yes… as Catholic we believe in a Tradition that has been handed down throughout the centuries…
Haven’t you picked this up being in the forums as long as you have?
One very simple word. Validation. If the big, bad, mean, OLD Catholic Church says it’s OK, then it must be fine.Why do people who aren’t part of the Church care what the Church does? Makes no sense to me.![]()
To be fair, change is a problem we must all grapple with. Fortunately, when it comes to faith and morals, we have eternal truths and values we can apply no matter what new situation or circumstance arises. Our faith is a real comfort these days.Will the new CEO of Apple follow in the footsteps of Steve Jobs or change it?
Will the new President change things during his Administration?
The Catholic Church is not a corporation and the Pope is not a President.
The worship of the false god, Change, is all I’m seeing. And the only thing to do for a worshiper of Change is to demand change everywhere, but especially in the Church. After all, there are a lot of registered Catholic voters.
Peace,
Ed
No, we don’t have to grapple with anything. The problem is this: agitators post here constantly to promote their liberal idea of the Catholic Church. We just have to remind them that God established the Catholic Church not the Change worshipers.To be fair, change is a problem we must all grapple with. Fortunately, when it comes to faith and morals, we have eternal truths and values we can apply no matter what new situation or circumstance arises. Our faith is a real comfort these days.
Truth never change. Certain things are as true today as they were in 1950 and will be in 2050. But within that context there is change. The second Vatican Council brought us change, not in eternal truths, but in the way we do things. I know very well, because I lived through it. I was in Rome circa 1965-1966 and was amused by churchgoers not knowing whether to sit, kneel or stand at various parts of the Novus Ordo. People who once recited their rosary throughout the Mass, or who tried to follow the Latin Mass with their native language version on the right-hand page, now heard the Mass, now differently worded in many places, in their own language.No, we don’t have to grapple with anything. The problem is this: agitators post here constantly to promote their liberal idea of the Catholic Church. We just have to remind them that God established the Catholic Church not the Change worshipers.
All change is caused by men, and most of it can be easily avoided. You just don’t do the public wrong things that you see others doing. Not because you think you’re better but because Catholics should not imitate bad and immoral behavior.
Peace,
Ed
Indeed. Pope John Paul II’s Ordinatio Sacerdotalis, which said:Nope, Pope Francis cannot allow women’s “ordination”. Why? Because it is utterly impossible for that to be done. The absolute only possible way for the doctrine on women’s “ordination” to change is for God to come down and tell us to change it. But the fact is, that is never going to happen because God never changes and therefore neither do His teachings.
…] was not issued specifically as an ex cathedra statement, but it is considered ex cathedra by the ordinary magisterium. In a responsium ad dubium, which was approved by John Paul II and issued October 1995, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith said that the teachings that JPII said in Ordinatio Sacerdotalis had been “set forth infallibly by the ordinary and universal magisterium” and was “to be held definitively, as belonging to the deposit of faith.”We declare that the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women and that this judgment is to be definitively held by all the Church’s faithful. - Ordinatio Sacerdotalis
I asked this to a friend who is anti-Catholic (she previously was a pious Catholic, now she is an atheist) for these reasons, and she said many things, but the basic of her argument was that she wished to make the Church accessible to all, and to stop its “hatred,” given its “power.”Why do people who aren’t part of the Church care what the Church does? Makes no sense to me.![]()
I sincerely hope you are not referring to me. i posted the original question. I have no desire for these things to change. i was looking for reassurance that they couldn’t.agitators post here constantly to promote their liberal idea of the Catholic Church.
Peace,
Ed