Can religious order priests become bishops?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tuviskazinai
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

tuviskazinai

Guest
Hi -
Does anyone know whether religious order priests (i.e., non-diocesan) can be elevated to bishops and cardinals? From what I can tell, this does happen (e.g., Boston Cardinal Sean Patrick O’Malley is a Capuchin friar) – but how common is it? It seems rather rare. And how is it usually done? Do religious order superiors make recommendations to Rome just like local bishops do?
Thank you very much!
 
Hi -
Does anyone know whether religious order priests (i.e., non-diocesan) can be elevated to bishops and cardinals? From what I can tell, this does happen (e.g., Boston Cardinal Sean Patrick O’Malley is a Capuchin friar) – but how common is it? It seems rather rare. And how is it usually done? Do religious order superiors make recommendations to Rome just like local bishops do?
Thank you very much!
Yes. See canon 705 regarding religious raised to the episcopacy.

Somewhat more frequent outside the U.S. where the original organization of the local Churches arose from religious communities and monasteries.

The selection of “bishop possibles” to be nominated to the supreme pontiff proceeds both formally, according to documented processes, and informally. Religious order superiors might make recommendations on an informal basis if asked.

One who is informed by the apostolic nuncio or other delegate may, of course, decline elevation to the episcopacy on the basis of all sorts of reasons, but would likely do so reluctantly in light of who is asking.

The cardinalate is another issue because the “role” of cardinals is not the same as that of bishops. The latter govern, sanctify and teach in the line of apostolic succession united with “Peter.”

Cardinals advise the pontiff, discharged particular duties he entrusts to them, and, when eligible, elect the pontiff. The criteria for the papal selection of a cardinal would thus be a little different.
 
Hi -
Does anyone know whether religious order priests (i.e., non-diocesan) can be elevated to bishops and cardinals? From what I can tell, this does happen (e.g., Boston Cardinal Sean Patrick O’Malley is a Capuchin friar) – but how common is it? It seems rather rare. And how is it usually done? Do religious order superiors make recommendations to Rome just like local bishops do?
Thank you very much!
My Bishop, George Murry, of the Diocese of Youngstown, Ohio, is a Jesuit. I do not know the process by which a priest of a religious order is named a Bishop.
 
One of the bishops of the Byzantine Catholic Metropolia of Pittsburgh sui juris is a Byzantine Franciscan.
 
All the bishops of my diocese, from its inception as a Vicariate Apostolic in 1946, to its elevation to a diocese in 1967 to its suppression last year (5 in all) have been Oblates of Mary Immaculate.

Here’s a list of the living bishops of Canada. See for yourself how many are not secular.

catholic-hierarchy.org/country/bca2.html
 
Also, Archbishop Terrence Prendergast of Ottawa is a Jesuit.
 
Hi -
Does anyone know whether religious order priests (i.e., non-diocesan) can be elevated to bishops and cardinals? From what I can tell, this does happen (e.g., Boston Cardinal Sean Patrick O’Malley is a Capuchin friar) – but how common is it? It seems rather rare. And how is it usually done? Do religious order superiors make recommendations to Rome just like local bishops do?
Thank you very much!
Here’s the Roman Canon Law on the matter:

Can. 377 §1. The Supreme Pontiff freely appoints bishops or confirms those legitimately elected.

§2. At least every three years, bishops of an ecclesiastical province or, where circumstances suggest it, of a conference of bishops, are in common counsel and in secret to compose a list of presbyters, even including members of institutes of consecrated life, who are more suitable for the episcopate. They are to send it to the Apostolic See, without prejudice to the right of each bishop individually to make known to the Apostolic See the names of presbyters whom he considers worthy of and suited to the episcopal function.

§3. Unless it is legitimately established otherwise, whenever a diocesan or coadjutor bishop must be appointed, as regards what is called the ternus to be proposed to the Apostolic See, the pontifical legate is to seek individually and to communicate to the Apostolic See together with his own opinion the suggestions of the metropolitan and suffragans of the province to which the diocese to be provided for belongs or with which it is joined in some grouping, and the suggestions of the president of the conference of bishops. The pontifical legate, moreover, is to hear some members of the college of consultors and cathedral chapter and, if he judges it expedient, is also to seek individually and in secret the opinion of others from both the secular and non-secular clergy and from laity outstanding in wisdom.

§4. Unless other provision has been legitimately made, a diocesan bishop who judges that an auxiliary should be given to his diocese is to propose to the Apostolic See a list of at least three presbyters more suitable for this office.

§5. In the future, no rights and privileges of election, nomination, presentation, or designation of bishops are granted to civil authorities.

Can. 378 §1. In regard to the suitability of a candidate for the episcopacy, **it is required that he is:

1/ outstanding in solid faith, good morals, piety, zeal for souls, wisdom, prudence, and human virtues, and endowed with other qualities which make him suitable to fulfill the office in question;

2/ of good reputation;

3/ at least thirty-Five years old;

4/ ordained to the presbyterate for at least Five years;

5/ in possession of a doctorate or at least a licentiate in sacred scripture, theology, or canon law from an institute of higher studies approved by the Apostolic See, or at least truly expert in the same disciplines. **

§2. The definitive judgment concerning the suitability of the one to be promoted pertains to the Apostolic See.

(Emphasis mine)
vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/__P1D.HTM

In the Eastern Churches in Union with Rome, most add one more requirement: not encumbered by marriage. (Either celibate, widowed, or rarely, with a living spouse retired to a women’s monastery.) Several restrict it further: monastic celibate priests. (As opposed to Monastic Widower priests…)

Here’s the CCEO canons (Canon Law for the Eastern Churches in Union with Rome)

Canon 180

In order for a person to be considered suitable for the episcopate, it is required that he:
(1) demonstrate solid faith, good morals, piety, zeal for souls and prudence;
(2) enjoy a good reputation;
(3) not be bound by a matrimonial bond;
(4) be at least thirty-five years old;
(5) ordained a presbyter for at least five years;
(6) possess a doctorate or licentiate in some sacred science or at least be an expert in it.

Canon 182
  1. Candidates suitable for the episcopate can be proposed only by members of the synod of bishops of the patriarchal Church who can, according to the norm of particular law, collect information and documents which are necessary to establish the suitability of the candidates, hearing, if they think it appropriate, secretly and individually, certain presbyters or also other Christian faithful outstanding in prudence and Christian life.
  2. The bishops are to report their findings to the patriarch at a suitable time prior to the convocation of the synod of bishops of the patriarchal Church. The patriarch, if the case warrants it, adding his own additional information, transmits the matter to all the members of the synod.
  3. Unless particular law approved by the Roman Pontiff states otherwise, the synod of bishops of the patriarchal Church is to examine the names of the candidates and compile a list of the candidates by secret ballot, which is to be transmitted through the patriarch to the Apostolic See to obtain the assent of the Roman Pontiff.
  4. The assent of the Roman Pontiff once given for an individual candidate is valid until it has been explicitly revoked, in which case the name of the candidate is to be removed from the list.
intratext.com/IXT/ENG1199/_P50.HTM
intratext.com/IXT/ENG1199/_P52.HTM

Romans pass the list on to the Pope. Easterner Synods maintain local lists, elect the new bishop, then ask for Papal approval. Eastern Churches having no Synod (being a single bishop or less) are provide a list to Rome for use when the time comes.

For Romans, it’s explicit: The bishops may recommend members of religious orders and societies.
 
Thank you all so much for your replies so far…I appreciate it!
 
We have 2 from our diocese…Cardinal George is a Missionary of the Oblates of Mary and Bishop Gustavo Garcia-Siller is a Missionary of the Holy Spirit…
 
You lost me. I thought that the “Cardinal” title was honorary title given to those who were already ORDAINED as bishops.
Now, usually. It wasn’t always.

There have been laymen who were cardinals.

The order of Cardinal Deacons were originally all just deacons and laymen, Cardinal Priests were priests, and cardinal bishops were bishops.

Now, however, the norm is episcopal ordination if not already a bishop, save for a few rare cases. The “honorary Cardinals” (retired lay theologians, mostly) were above the voting age for the conclave at installation anyway.

and the Tite comes with a duty: to serve as papal elector should the pope die before you turn 70…
 
Now, usually. It wasn’t always.

There have been laymen who were cardinals.

The order of Cardinal Deacons were originally all just deacons and laymen, Cardinal Priests were priests, and cardinal bishops were bishops.

Now, however, the norm is episcopal ordination if not already a bishop, save for a few rare cases. The “honorary Cardinals” (retired lay theologians, mostly) were above the voting age for the conclave at installation anyway.

and the Tite comes with a duty: to serve as papal elector should the pope die before you turn 70…
Taking the last sentence first, it is the 80th birthday that disqualifies a cardinal from being an elector, rather than the 70th birthday. This age was established by Paul VI in 1971 with the decree Ingravescentem Aetetem, and reaffirmed by John Paul II in 1996 with his apostolic constitution Universi Dominici Gregis.

The so-called “lay cardinals” of history were in fact, not laymen, but tonsured clerics in minor orders (lector, acolyte, porter, exorcists). These were in centuries past, and not recently, as the above post would seem to suggest. Canon 351 requires that those selected for the cardinalate must already be at least a priest, and then must be ordained bishops, unless the Holy Father dispenses them from ordination.
 
In current use of the term, minor orders are still laymen, not clerics. (See the code of canon law).

It’s only been a little over a century since the last non-priest cardinal was elevated. (late 1800s.)

I stand corrected on the age.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top