Can someone expalin 1 corinthians 11:14-15?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gift_from_God
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
G

Gift_from_God

Guest
*Does not the very nature of things teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a disgrace to him, but that if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For long hair is given to her as a covering.
*

I doubt this is to be taken literally, as it’s often assumed that Jesus had long hair. Can someone explain it to me?
 
*Does not the very nature of things teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a disgrace to him, but that if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For long hair is given to her as a covering.
*

I doubt this is to be taken literally, as it’s often assumed that Jesus had long hair. Can someone explain it to me?
It seems obvious from what Paul writes that men did not generally wear hair long. The exception is one who took a Nazarite vow, like Samson, and probably John the Baptist. Because Jesus was from Nazareth, it may have been assumed that he was a Nazarite, but this is uncertain.
It does point out, however, why the Church still asks women to cover their heads at the liturgies where their glory, their hair that they are so concerned about, is hidden so that all glory be given to God.
 
The long hair worn by Jesus and those He chose to be His Apostles–why was their hair long? So that they would be rejected by the world. At that time, only the old, the elderly, wore their hair in such fashion, and those dedicated to the rabbinicalhood–priesthood. It was not the custom of the day to wear hair long. If you will look into your books of history, you will note this. But Jesus Christ did not wish to be looked upon with vanity, though beautiful was His face. He chose to be unrecognized among the crowds, as did those He chose to be His teachers, the Apostles.”

But now men just use longhair as a sign of full blown vanity.
 
It seems obvious from what Paul writes that men did not generally wear hair long. The exception is one who took a Nazarite vow, like Samson, and probably John the Baptist. Because Jesus was from Nazareth, it may have been assumed that he was a Nazarite, but this is uncertain.
There is no relationship between the Nazarite vow and being a Nazarean.
 
*Does not the very nature of things teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a disgrace to him, but that if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For long hair is given to her as a covering.
*

I doubt this is to be taken literally, as it’s often assumed that Jesus had long hair. Can someone explain it to me?
I believe the answer you are looking for is that “long hair” here in meant Lonnnnnnnnng hair…like a woman may wear.

What Jesus etc may have had would not be that* kind of long*…you know the way we normally picture him…
 
There is no relationship between the Nazarite vow and being a Nazarean.
Nor was a relationship posited. What was posited was a confusion between the two. We have absolutely no information about the length of Jesus’ hair, only speculation.
 
Nor was a relationship posited. What was posited was a confusion between the two. We have absolutely no information about the length of Jesus’ hair, only speculation.
ok, I misunderstood.
 
The long hair worn by Jesus and those He chose to be His Apostles–why was their hair long? So that they would be rejected by the world. At that time, only the old, the elderly, wore their hair in such fashion, and those dedicated to the rabbinicalhood–priesthood. It was not the custom of the day to wear hair long. If you will look into your books of history, you will note this. But Jesus Christ did not wish to be looked upon with vanity, though beautiful was His face. He chose to be unrecognized among the crowds, as did those He chose to be His teachers, the Apostles.”

But now men just use longhair as a sign of full blown vanity.
We don’t know whether Jesus and the Apostles had long hair or not.
 
*Does not the very nature of things teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a disgrace to him, but that if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For long hair is given to her as a covering.
*

I doubt this is to be taken literally, as it’s often assumed that Jesus had long hair. Can someone explain it to me?
According to the Navarre Bible Commentary Saint Paul is merely appealing to cultural norms in order to emphasize the need to dress in a modest fashion. :eek:
 
No doubt about it, Jesus Had long hair.
Chances are most of his followers (Mainly Peter) had long hair.
How long? And you know this because… ? Actually, I brlieve that there certainly may be doubt about it. Is there doubt about His followers (“Chances are…”)? And why mainly Peter?
 
Jesus must have had long hair. I can’t find a single instance in scripture where it says He went to a barber. Sorry, I was just applying the same logic that Baptist use to deny infant baptism.
 
Jesus must have had long hair. I can’t find a single instance in scripture where it says He went to a barber. Sorry, I was just applying the same logic that Baptist use to deny infant baptism.
:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

I just looked it up in my “New Jerome Biblical Commentary”. I’m not sure I should post what it says. I certainly do not want to offend anyone.

Basically it says Paul was saying men should look like men and women like women.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top