L
Langdell
Guest
I think what Fred (and Sofia and I as well) are wondering is: Why don’t you believe in Marian apparitions, especially since you’re Catholic?I don’t know what you mean, Why what?![]()
I think what Fred (and Sofia and I as well) are wondering is: Why don’t you believe in Marian apparitions, especially since you’re Catholic?I don’t know what you mean, Why what?![]()
I have had this and agree.A good book and easy to read, on the topic I found very helpful is: A Still Small Voice by Fr. Benedict J. Groeschel. He goes into what apparitions are and aren’t, how the Church examines them, and the benefits they bring to the faithful. I cannot recommend it highly enough.
The good news is … you don’t have to.Yes I have read about them, but not convinced , to me too hard to believe,
but who knows, I sure don’t.
I am not denying the fact that the Virgin Mary is special and I"m sure is in heaven next to Jesus, I mean after all she is the mother of God, and she rightly deserves our honor,
but I just have a hard time believing these sitings.![]()
Well, she usually appeared to people who weren’t powerful or or wealthy but to people chosen to renew faith in Christ and his Church. For instance, at Lourdes, Marie Bernard (Bernadette) was dragged before the local officials and threatened with being thrown into jail or an institution for the insane if she wouldn’t recant her visions. Why? Because the government was officially anti-Church. The same thing in Portugal and Fatima. And in Ireland the people had been persecuted for centuries because of their faith. Mary was sent as God’s gentlest messenger to remind the world that the meek will inherit the earth, not the rich and powerful. In Mexico St. Juan Diego was a simple peasant who had been born into paganism but who had embraced the faith. After the apparitions there millions were baptized and believed in Christ.Yes I have read about them, but not convinced , to me too hard to believe,
but who knows, I sure don’t.
I am not denying the fact that the Virgin Mary is special and I"m sure is in heaven next to Jesus, I mean after all she is the mother of God, and she rightly deserves our honor,
but I just have a hard time believing these sitings.![]()
Why do you find them hard to believe? Why are the approved apparitions harder to believe than that God became man in the Roman province of Judea around 2-3 B.C.?Yes I have read about them, but not convinced , to me too hard to believe,
but who knows, I sure don’t.
I am not denying the fact that the Virgin Mary is special and I"m sure is in heaven next to Jesus, I mean after all she is the mother of God, and she rightly deserves our honor,
but I just have a hard time believing these sitings.![]()
I think this is because you may be confused as to what apparitions are, how they are investigated, and why the Church decides if they are “worthy of belief” (or not). It’s why I recommend Fr. Benedict Groeschel’s book, A Still Small Voice so strongly. It will answer such questions and give you a better handle on their place in our faith.Della
Thats fine, anything that brings people to be saved is a good thing, as long as its not deceptive,
but see I just don’t really believe in the apparations, even if the the CC promotes them.
but who am I to say,![]()
Classy.The good news is … you don’t have to.
The bad news is … you will get a lot of peer pressure to conform and accept them.
All well and good; I might suggest, like a couple others here, that you do some further reading and research on some of the apparitions approved by the Church, if you still have questions. Whether you choose to believe in them or not, their messages usually go far beyond “Jesus is real and Mary is his Mother” (not to belittle that statement, or your ability to believe in it faithfully). That will help “explain” them better to you, in the sense that you will at least more fully understand their messages, even if you don’t choose to believe in them.No I’m not confused. Hey I think its great if it leads someone to believe in Jesus as our Saviour, what can be better than that to make believers. I don’t need to believe in them to believe in Jesus tho.
and maybe statements like this:
We are a people who believe because God has revealed himself to us in the Church. We must believe the Church has the authority to decide matters of faith and morals, although we are not obligated to accept apparitions, only that the Church declared them “worthy of belief”. So, don’t feel pressured to accept them, but do accept that the Church has made its decisions about them and has promoted them because they increase people’s faith.
No I have no problem believing in Jesus and Mary was his mother.
LTS – I don’t doubt your faith. In fact, that’s why I’m so curious about why you find it hard to accept the approved Marian apparitions. In other words, since your faith is strong, I assume you have no trouble with the idea that Jesus and Mary could appear to us if they wanted to. So I wonder what it is about the approved apparitions that causes you to doubt them?No I’m not confused. Hey I think its great if it leads someone to believe in Jesus as our Saviour, what can be better than that to make believers. I don’t need to believe in them to believe in Jesus tho.
and maybe statements like this:
We are a people who believe because God has revealed himself to us in the Church. We must believe the Church has the authority to decide matters of faith and morals, although we are not obligated to accept apparitions, only that the Church declared them “worthy of belief”. So, don’t feel pressured to accept them, but do accept that the Church has made its decisions about them and has promoted them because they increase people’s faith.
No I have no problem believing in Jesus and Mary was his mother.
And I am not questioning your faith in the least. I am just concerned that you dismiss approved apparitions as if they are somehow unbelieveable. If they were unbelieveable the Church would not have approved them.No I’m not confused. Hey I think its great if it leads someone to believe in Jesus as our Saviour, what can be better than that to make believers. I don’t need to believe in them to believe in Jesus tho.
and maybe statements like this:
We are a people who believe because God has revealed himself to us in the Church. We must believe the Church has the authority to decide matters of faith and morals, although we are not obligated to accept apparitions, only that the Church declared them “worthy of belief”. So, don’t feel pressured to accept them, but do accept that the Church has made its decisions about them and has promoted them because they increase people’s faith.
No I have no problem believing in Jesus and Mary was his mother.
I understand your point of view, but the way you quote “a select few” makes me very uneasy. Many of the people who have experienced these visions and apparitions (those approved by the Church) led lives remarkable for their intensity of suffering and love for others. Indeed, we know that’s how we draw closer to God…if some folks have found the way to do that, and are thus able to see and hear our Lady’s messages to the whole world, what’s wrong with that?Why don’t I believe in the apparitions , ok, in my mind God would not show some people , a select few may I add, proff of his existance. that would not be fair to the rest of us.
Look at the rich man, wanting to send Lazarus to his family so that they can believe, and the answer was if they did not believe Moses and the prophets and the scriptures (they ahd the torah at that time) why would they believe someone raised from the dead, or something like that.
I think we need to have faith, I think when Jesus comes we all will know. I think the first siting which someone imagined as real, word spread and then there was more sitings so thats what I think.
I don’t know if I explained it well or not, Now this is just my opinion.