Can someone who believes in OSAS help me?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Elzee
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
BigJack1:
Sonseeker,

Know 1st of all that I’m praying for you. Someone like yourself who is flattered so much with your own knowledge that you don’t have the humility necessary to ever submit to the truth will never be swayed by any arguement, no matter how logically sound. I will ask the Blessed Mother (that ought to make you blow a gasket) to intercede for you that your heart will soften.
Thanks Jack, you have a big heart; God will bless you for intentionally trying to get me to “blow a gasket.”
BigJack:
You know full well what I meant about the comment concerning Jesus not picking Matthias as one of the 12. If I have to spell it out for you. . . he did not, while in the flesh, walk up to Matthias (as he did the others) and say “follow me”. Of course the Apostles prayed for guidance in choosing a successor. The leaders of the Church still do and they still rely on the Holy Spirit to guide them, just as the 11 relied on Him back then.
In fact I answered what you said, that Christ didn’t pick Matthias. You are sloppy in your statements, and come back and clarify after I’ve answered, trying to make it look like I’m playing games with you. Be clearer in your statements.
BigJack:
Next, you quote how the successor to Judas had to be a witness to the resurrection. Does this disqualify Paul, Timothy, and Titusfrom being Bishops?
Jack there is a huge difference between apostolic succession and appointing of Bishops. Appointing of Elders and teachers etc are laid out for in the scripture. There is no longer an office of apostle. Get used to it.
BigJack:
Your last part really shakes your credibility. Yes indeed, God did give us the Bible. You obviously believe however that he accomplished this one day by opening up the sky and having the completed work fall down to the Earth. I tend to believe that he worked through His Church and revealed the cannon of scripture to the world through it.(Review the history. You can come to no other conclusion). I have taken my own advice. I used to be much like you. I thought I had it figured out. Thankfully I was eventually able to take the more humble approach and realize that maybe, just maybe, my own personal beliefs might not be eternal truth. Indeed I was able to discover that the Lord gave us the gift of his Church as the “pillar and foundation of truth” (yes the Church, not the Bible, is the pillar and foundation of truth) and as such, I must acknowledge that what it teaches is the truth Christ wants the faithful to have.
Jack you can go on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on about the the church giving us everything, including God and the Son. Listen to me, me and many, many others reject your argument. Its only basis is in history, not in truth.

Thanks, but I do not have the desire to continue in this tit for tat argument.
 
**Isaiah 1:19-20 **

If you be willing, and will hearken to me, you shall eat the good things of the land.

But if you will not, and will provoke me to wrath: the sword shall devour you because the mouth of the Lord hath spoken it.
 
Baptism does not take away our free will or freedom of choice, but gives us the freedom no longer to be tyrannized by the devil unless we choose to be. After baptism it is in our power either to persist willingly in the practice of the commandments of Christ, into Whom we were baptized, and to advance in the path of His ordinances, or to deviate from this straight way and to fall again into the hands of our enemy, the devil.

St Symeon the New Theologian
 
40.png
Philthy:
Scripture doesn’t teach, people do. Scripture is read. You’ll read Scripture with a genuine heart and get one meaning. I’ll read it with a genuine heart and may get another. It goes back to the formal insufficiency of Scripture to fully communicate all of itself, despite all the info being there. You never addressed this issue from my post. Confronted with this reality some choose to “agree to disagree” and label their disagreements as “non-essentials” under the banner of “unity”. It is admirable, but I don’t buy it and the everchanging “biblical” doctrine just keeps growing and growing…

Thanks again for your thoughtful posts…

Phil
Phil, scripture does teach. The writer of Hebrews tells us that word of God is living and active…you are smooth talker, and smooth talkers are a dime a dozen. Believe what you will; I have neither the interest, nor the ability to pry you away from your beliefs.
 
Therefore, since the time of this life is a time for repentance, the mere fact that a sinner who desires to return to God can still live, proves that one is accepted by Him. For here in this life is always present freedom of choice. Free will, then, is founded upon the possibility of the acceptance or repudiance of the above mentioned way of life and death. A person possesses the ability to choose whenever one wishes.

St. Gregory Palamas
 
We have learned from the prophets, and we hold it to be true, that punishments, chastisements, and rewards are rendered according to the merit of each man’s actions. Otherwise, if all things happen by fate, then nothing is in our own power. For if it be predestined that one man be good and another man evil, then the first is not deserving of praise or the other to be blamed. Unless humans have the power of avoiding evil and choosing good by free choice, they are not accountable for their actions-whatever they may be… For neither would a man be worthy of reward or praise if he did not of himself choose the good, but was merely created for that end. Likewise, if a man were evil, he would not deserve punishment, since he was not evil of himself, being unable to do anything else than what he was made for.

110-165AD St. Justin Martyr
 
…if anyone has drawn close to God, he has evidently approached Him by means of His energy. In what way? By natural participation in that energy? But this is common to all created things. It is not, therefore, by virtue of natural qualities, but by virtue of what one achieves through free choice that one is close to or distant from God.

But free choice pertains only to beings endowed with intelligence. So among all creatures only those endowed with intelligence can be far from or close to God, drawing close to Him through virtue or becoming distant through vice. Thus such beings alone are capable of wretchedness or blessedness. Let us strive to lay hold of blessedness.

St. Gregory Palamas
 
Gottle of Geer:
Gottle of Geer:
Does this loss of ability mean that the unregenerate man is incapable of - let us say - acts of kindness and self-sacrifice ?
Absolutely not! You are quite right, and that is what the idea of “total depravity” does not mean. Unregenerate men are capable of extraordinary acts of kindness, generosity, bravery, etc. But if they reject Christ, what are those acts worth?
Gottle of Geer:
Or, does it mean that he is capable of them, but, that because he is fallen, they are reckoned as being as worthless as acts which are clearly sinful, such as murder or theft ? Is there no moral difference between the unjustified murderer, and the unjustified man who prevents his attempts to commit murder - or are they “in the same boat”, not because there is no distinction between attempting & preventing murder, but because neither is justified ? ##
The one will receive a lesser punishment than the other; however, for me, eternal condemnation is eternal condemnation.

May I say to you that I thoroughly enjoy your posts. You are kind, and thoughtful, much more so than I am, much to my chagrin. And, you are certainly brighter than I.

This free will argument is close to my heart, I cannot escape what the Word says:

Daniel 4:35: “All the inhabitants of the earth are accounted as nothing, But He does according to His will in the host of heaven And among the inhabitants of earth; And no one can ward off His hand Or say to Him, ‘What have You done?’”

Psalm 39:5: “Behold, You have made my days as handbreadths, And my lifetime as nothing in Your sight; Surely every man at his best is a mere breath.

Psalm 144:4: Man is like a mere breath; His days are like a passing shadow.

Psalm 89:47: *Remember what my span of life is; For what vanity You have created all the sons of men! *

We are all, far too often, full of ourselves. Shakespeare understood:

All the world’s a stage
And all the men and women merely players:
They have their exits and their entrances;
And one man in his time plays many parts,
His acts being seven ages. At first the infant,
Mewling and puking in the nurse’s arms.
Then the whining school-boy, with his satchel
And shining morning face, creeping like snail
Unwillingly to school. And then the lover,
Sighing like furnace, with a woeful ballad
Made to his mistress’ eyebrow. Then a soldier,
Full of strange oaths, and bearded like the pard,
Jealous in honor, sudden and quick in quarrel,
Seeking the bubble reputation
Even in the cannon’s mouth. And then the justice,
In fair round belly with good capon lined,
With eyes severe and beard of formal cut,
Full of wise saws and modern instances;
And so he plays his part. The sixth age shifts
Into the lean and slippered pantaloon,
With spectacles on nose and pouch on side,
His youthful hose, well saved, a world too wide
For his shrunk shank; and his big manly voice,
Turning again toward childish treble, pipes
And whistles in his sound. Last scene of all,
That ends this strange eventful history,
Is second childishness and mere oblivion,
Sans teeth, sans eyes, sans taste, sans every thing.

We live by His will, and on His time, eh?

Thank you, Gottle, your posts are a blessing

Bill
 
**Man is made in the image of God, Who is humble but at the same time free. Therefore it is normal and natural that he should be after the likeness of his Creator - that he should recoil from exercising control over others while himself being free and independent by virtue of the presence of the Holy Spirit within him. Those who are possessed by the lust for power cloud the image of God in themselves. **

Archimandrite Sophrony
 
40.png
sonseeker:
To understand the sufficiency of the Bible, read Scripture Alone, by James White. Once you have done that, you will understand what is meant by sola scriptura. Perhaps then we can discuss it.
The original question was, can someone explain OSAS. A bibliography of books to read was not asked for. Can you explain OSAS using scripture alone?
 
40.png
sonseeker:
You too, need to first understand the doctrine, before any fruitful discussion. Read the Boettner book above,
That’s not what was asked for in the opening question to this thread. Can you ***explain ***OSAS?
 
40.png
sonseeker:
Thanks Jack, you have a big heart; God will bless you for intentionally trying to get me to “blow a gasket.”

Oh, sorry, that wasn’t me trying to get you to blow a gasket. I don’t have free will. It was God’s will.

In fact I answered what you said, that Christ didn’t pick Matthias. You are sloppy in your statements, and come back and clarify after I’ve answered, trying to make it look like I’m playing games with you. Be clearer in your statements.

No, you tried to point out that Christ did hand pick Matthias. My point all along was that he was chosen by the 11 with the guidance of the Holy Spirit. Sorry if that was not clear from my original post.

Jack there is a huge difference between apostolic succession and appointing of Bishops. Appointing of Elders and teachers etc are laid out for in the scripture. There is no longer an office of apostle. Get used to it.

It doesn’t matter what you call the office. The fact of the matter is that the authority possesed by the Aposltes (given by Christ) was transferrable by them to their successors. This is demonstrated clearly in the Scriptures and the practice that began with the transferring of authority from Jesus to the Apostles and from the Apostles to their successors is one that has continued down to the present day. Logically, how could it be any other way? If the authority is not transferrable, how are the faithful to remained united (please agree that Christ wanted his flock to remain united)? Did He intend for unity to end after the Apostles died? It just makes no sense.

Jack you can go on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on about the the church giving us everything, including God and the Son. Listen to me, me and many, many others reject your argument. Its only basis is in history, not in truth.

Of course the Church didn’t give us the father and the son. Rather, God the blessed Trinity gave us the Church, which is indeed the body of Christ, inseperable from Christ. That Church then must be the ordained institution Christ wants His flock to belong to. “Its only basis in in history, not in truth”? What does that mean? In your world view, their is no way to determine what objective eternal truth is. Is what you believe objective eternal truth? If so, how do I know it is vs. what the other 20,000+ different denominational groups teach? If you choose to believe that God indeed intended this chaos, go right ahead. I choose to belive He did not intend this chaos and that He established his Church to prevent such.

Thanks, but I do not have the desire to continue in this tit for tat argument.
Then don’t reply to my posts.
 
40.png
sonseeker:
Phil, scripture does teach. The writer of Hebrews tells us that word of God is living and active…you are smooth talker, and smooth talkers are a dime a dozen. Believe what you will; I have neither the interest, nor the ability to pry you away from your beliefs.
Im sorry I offended you - that was not my intent. Nor was it my intent to do anything underhanded. I don’t think I am a smooth talker, but I am articulate on occasion and have an especially strong sense of logic which most people find obnoxious - just ask my wife! Anyhow, Im grateful that we had the dialogue that we did and totally understand both your frustration and your good intent.

Phil
 
40.png
Matt16_18:
You are clearly contradicting yourself. You have said that neither Adam nor Lucifer had free will, and now you are saying that before the Fall, that Adam could CHOOSE to be either obedient or disobedient to God’s will. If Adam could make that choice, then you cannot deny that Adam had the freedom of will to be able to make that choice.

Whether or not unregenerate men are free to not commit sin is totally irrelevant to any discussion of OSAS, since OSAS is not a doctrine that concerns unregenerate men. OSAS is a doctrine that concerns regenerate men. Christ sets free the regenerate man from the bondage to sin. If you do not believe that truth, then in no way can you claim to be a Christian.

The Christian is like Adam before the Fall, he is not in bondage to sin, and he can choose to be either obedient or disobedient to God’s will. If the Christian chooses to commit mortal sin, he will lose the eternal life abiding in him and become spiritually dead, just as Adam became spiritually dead by choosing disobedience to God.
Strong, logical, scriptural and well articulated! 👍

Thank you,

Phil
 
40.png
Elzee:
Here’s the scenario:

Let’s say at the age of 15 I accepted Jesus and my Lord and Savior and this faith was obviously what I’ve heard referred to as ‘saving faith’. For 6 years it was obvious my life was dedicated to Jesus - I was active in evangelizing others, was baptized in the Holy Spirit as evidenced by speaking in tongues, and helped bring many people to the Lord. I was on fire for the Lord. Then I go off to college. I get lazy in my Christian faith and am exposed to people of many different faiths. I become intrigued with a non-Christian faith and 2 years later I begin worshiping with this non-Christian faith, renouncing my Christianity. I no longer believe that Jesus is the Son of God. He is no longer, in my heart or my mind, my Lord and Savior. I am now dedicated to bringing Christians over to my newly found truth and am leading people away from Christ. In this scenario:
  1. Was I never saved to begin with, because if I had been, I wouldn’t have rejected Jesus 8 years later? If so, then how would I ever know I was saved since I can’t predict the future? Did I only think I was saved but really wasn’t all those years I was dedicating my life to Jesus?
  2. I’m still saved and if died tonight I would to to heaven, even though I now totally reject Christ and his work on the cross and actively try to get others to reject Him?
  3. I’ve given up my salvation through my own choice - not God’s - but if I repent and turn back I can once again be assured of my salvation because Jesus will always welcome me back.
Would the answers to the above questions be different if I didnt’t reject my Christianity but perhaps instead entered the world of child pornography or mass murdering? I still believe that Jesus is my Lord and Savior and that all my sins - past, present, and future - are forgiven and paid for through the work of Jesus on the cross. I’m just not living like I believe it.

Thank you!
The problem is your whole question is hypothetical, there’s no reality to it. It’s like trying to learn history by reading fantasy novels. Your question, in reality, is rooted in unbelief and a challenge to the “word of the cross.” A couple of Scriptures come to mind which I think are befitting:

“But the word of the cross is to those who are perishing foolishness, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God” (1 Cor. 1:18).

“…but we preach Christ crucified, to Jews a stumbling block, and to Gentiles foolishness” (1 Cor. 1:23).
 
Mickey said:
“I call heaven and earth to witness against you this day, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse; therefore choose life, that you and your descendants may live, loving the Lord your God, obeying his voice, and cleaving to him; for that means life to you and length of days, that you may dwell in the land which the Lord swore to your fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, to give them”** (Deut. 30:19-20).**

Mickey, James White has asked for you by name on his blog to come on his show and offer proof for statements you have made about him

Tonight, 6/23/05 7 edt, or call in 877-753-3341.

I’ll be listening for you.
 
Ah yes, I was in the process of trying to pm everyone from the thread entitled James WHite that our specific thread had the honor of being mentioned by James White. Here is the link. SOnseeker saved me a lot of trouble, by mentioning it on this thread…

aomin.org/index.php?itemid=494

I wonder why James White would care what some unknown people write about him on a forum? Either way, we must have hit a nerve. Good for us.😃

By the way, Sonseeker, does James WHite follow the same Calvinistic approach to the bible and OSAS as you do? I am just curious.
 
40.png
linus:
The problem is your whole question is hypothetical, there’s no reality to it. It’s like trying to learn history by reading fantasy novels. Your question, in reality, is rooted in unbelief and a challenge to the “word of the cross.” A couple of Scriptures come to mind which I think are befitting:

“But the word of the cross is to those who are perishing foolishness, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God” (1 Cor. 1:18).

“…but we preach Christ crucified, to Jews a stumbling block, and to Gentiles foolishness” (1 Cor. 1:23).
This scenario is far from “hypothetical” and is very common. I am glad that you don’t personally know anyone who has turned away from God after being saved, that means that you don’t experience the heartache that family members have. There are people in this world, believe it or not, who turn from God purposely, out of anger for instance, because their mother was taken from them (example of someone I know)
 
40.png
sonseeker:
Mickey, James White has asked for you by name on his blog to come on his show and offer proof for statements you have made about him

Tonight, 6/23/05 7 edt, or call in 877-753-3341.

I’ll be listening for you.
I am flattered! 😃 But I am not an apologist and I don’t participate in debates or talk shows. Give my regards to JW though–and tell him that I pray for him often! 🙂

Blessings,
Mickey
 
40.png
deb1:
I wonder why James White would care what some unknown people write about him on a forum?
Pride and ego. The Church Fathers have much to say about those passions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top