D
Dale_M
Guest
That difference may have to do with the differing ways in how health care is paid for in our two countries. In the UK, medical costs are ordinarily assumed by the government, so whether a candidate has HIV or not won’t make a difference to the diocese or community which is considering him. In the US, medical costs are born by private health insurance companies or by a self-insured pool of money.Interesting that in the US at least some dioceses test for HIV. I was accepted in the UK for seminary training (I didn’t begin it though, for reasons I won’t go into here) and while I had a health assessment I didn’t have an HIV test, just a urine sample to cover things like drug use, diabetes, etc.
As Br. David mentioned, many private health insurance companies reject persons with pre-existing conditions. And given the cost of HIV care, I can see how providing such care would be a financial burden on a diocese or religious community.
BTW, in response to other comments in this thread, simply living with someone with HIV does not put you in danger of contracting the virus. That was established 20 years ago, and confirmed many times. Similarly, there is no danger from contracting the virus from a priest at Mass.