B
billcu1
Guest
Can the finite mind understand love in it’s highest form that I would guess would be explained in 1 Corin. 13 ?
Yes, but only as a gift of grace, which is why the Church classifies love as one of the three theological-supernatural-virtues.Can the finite mind understand love in it’s highest form that I would guess would be explained in 1 Corin. 13 ?
I disagree with your first sentence where you say God is not love. God in his ultimate simplicity has no attributes. God is love. God is truth, God is knowledge in their most perfect sense.Love is NOT God therefore love is not infinite.
And yes love can be experienced, reflected on, and understood by a finite mind. Love is the very purpose of our existence and what we were made for.
God wouldn’t make His own children incapable of understanding their own purpose.
What clouds our understanding of love is sin and its effects.
Love is not a mystery. The reason why the God of the universe would love humans so much to die by scourging and a Roman crucifixion to atone for our sins is a great mystery.
Yes I have experienced some of those things. But are feelings reliable ? They are not good or bad but just are. The love I think of is selflessness. and a lack of selfishness. It is also said that “No greater love has no man than this to lay his life down for his friends.” That would be selflessness. But would that also be lack of love for one’s self as a creature of God?billcu1 asks if a person can Love REAL Big.
So, what is the definition of Love, in this situation?
“Love is** Patient**, Love is Kind … it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. … It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.”
This is NOT a definition of Love, as much as attributes of Love.
The way I see Love in the REAL World : When a person feels a Spiritual Love for another person, differing amounts of these attributes of Love are expressed at different times.
A parent can stay VERY **patient **with her young Baby as it attempts to do a new “thing” … especially patient for that First Step.
A girl runs up to her Mom in tears, and sobs through a story of what has upset her; Mom can be VERY Kind to her, to help heal that pain.
A person is taking care of his Father, who has Alzheimer’s.
This person who used to strong and well-spoken . . . is now ranting incessantly, has times where he is completely out-of-Touch with what’s going on.
This son is usually **slow to anger **(and doesn’t keep a record of the 1000 times his Father has done inappropriate things.
But beyond that piece-of-Love stuff, there are close relationships where (most of the time), there can be 2 people who can actually Live-out I Corr 13.
Several people I have known over the years have designed situations in which they could keep themselves in a Spiritual Love for a while.
One time was at a Retreat, where we all knew each other, and volunteered to LIVE in a state of Pure Love (as much as is humanly possible) for two 4-hour periods (one each day).
But, most people can hold themselves together Love-wise for a few minutes at a time.
The BIG problem is when you attempt to KEEP yourself at that peak level of Loving.
This is where even most SAINTS falter. Feelings are very temporary.
So, to feel Love for an Hour, it would need to re-newed in your Heart 60 or 100 times.
This takes practice, AND it takes WANNA.
The Truth is, most people do not wanna feel themselves in that rarified Air of warm Love for more than a minute or 2.
It takes a lot of energy, and you have to set your Ego aside, and re-direct your Loving attention to the other person.
This type of Spiritual Love is easiest to direct to God. He’s a lovable Guy.
And, where other people are vastly imperfect … it is said that God IS perfect.
So, since God beams out waves of Love every second of every day, it is easier to return His Love for a little while … in a Pure state (or a Pure-enough state).
So, I would ask the OP: have you EVER felt any of the attributes of Love toward another Human Being?
If so, that’s a good start.
The secret is, to read the rest of that List, and practice trying to give that person a different attribute from the List.
This can turn into a FUN game . . . a Fun and rewarding game.
I have played the Game many times, and I plan to keep playing it for years to come.
Self-love is good; “inordinate self-love”, aka “pride”, is not good. One can be self-less, and perform selfless acts, and still love oneself.Yes I have experienced some of those things. But are feelings reliable ? They are not good or bad but just are. The love I think of is selflessness. and a lack of selfishness. It is also said that “No greater love has no man than this to lay his life down for his friends.” That would be selflessness. But would that also be lack of love for one’s self as a creature of God?
I didn’t say “God is not love”. I said that “love is not God becsuse love is not infinite”. God’s ability to love is infinite because He is infinite, love itself has limits.I disagree with your first sentence where you say God is not love. God in his ultimat simplicity has no attributes. God is love. God is truth, God is knowledge in their most perfect sense.
Love is not created; it’s an aspect of God’s essence.I didn’t say “God is not love”. I said that “love is not God becsuse love is not infinite”. God’s ability to love is infinite because He is infinite, love itself has limits.
God is love, but it in no way follows that “Love is God”. God created love, you are deifying a created thing a placing it on par with God.
If I understand Thomism right essence and substance is the same in God. Therefore God has no “possessions”. Nor does he possess things. He is these things in their perfection. Looking at things from the point of view of simplicity. God has no “parts” nor “attributes”. I know we say God loves this and prefers that but that’s also in error from a certain point of view. God loves the sinner hates the sin. All sin is is turning from the unchanging to the changing. Theologica GermanicaLove is not created; it’s an aspect of God’s essence.
Love is not created; it’s an aspect of God’s essence.
Love is God’s essence, but love didn’t create God. Love necessarily has its source in God, not vice-versa.
Yes, but only because God has His source in God.Love is God’s essence, but love didn’t create God. Love necessarily has its source in God, not vice-versa.
Yes-or which are rarely divine in origin at any rate.And, because of the English word “love” and its ambiguous meaning its important to distinguish between the divine essence and human expressions of love which are not divine in origin.
35 Can anything ever separate us from Christ’s love? Does it mean he no longer loves us if we have trouble or calamity, or are persecuted, or hungry, or destitute, or in danger, or threatened with death? 36 (As the Scriptures say, “For your sake we are killed every day; we are being slaughtered like sheep.”[a]) 37 No, despite all these things, overwhelming victory is ours through Christ, who loved us.
38 And I am convinced that nothing can ever separate us from God’s love. Neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons,** neither our fears for today nor our worries about tomorrow—not even the powers of hell can separate us from God’s love. 39 No power in the sky above or in the earth below—indeed, nothing in all creation will ever be able to separate us from the love of God that is revealed in Christ Jesus our Lord.** Romans 8:35-39
Amen.