Can violence in the Bible be explained away as symbolic myth, instead of history?

  • Thread starter Thread starter minion
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
You’re argument is with God (a dangerous thing in light of your nick).
Not at all. The argument is with human interpretations of what God has done.
He tells us in His word that He was doing this (using men).
That is your interpretation. A sound theological interpretation of Scripture, reading all things through the lens of Jesus rather than in a Quran’ic manner, does not lead to this conclusion.

For one thing, it’s not at all clear that it happened at all.
Doesn’t God have the right to do what He wants with His creation?/QUOTE]
It’s not about “right”–it’s about God’s nature and what it means for us to affirm God’s goodness and trust in God.
The God who emerges from the fundamentalist reading of Scripture is not God. It would be idolatrous to worship such a God. “Rights” don’t enter into it one way or the other.
 
I ask because I was watching youtube (it really has replaced my television), and was watching some of Fr. Barron’s videos:

Violence in the Bible
youtube.com/watch?v=1A65Wfr2is0

Additional Commentary
youtube.com/watch?v=N7y5lTBIGsU

Now, I realize I’m just an average guy reading the Bible, but what he says sounds like kind of a stretch to me, when Fr. Barron states things like the various people the Israelites killed down to a man are merely poetic, “symbolic” expressions of the purification of sin, or to emphasize a military victory by a poet, not meant to be taken literally.

Now, while I can understand a book such as Genesis using mythological language, it seems like a real stretch to carry that to his later examples, that seem pretty clear to me the Israelites were ordered to kill every man, woman, child, baby and their animals, or Samuel hacking a king to bits with a sword.

Maybe someone could provide some insight on Fr. Barron’s words?
This shows the problem with rejecting the historical accuracy of Genesis. Once you’ve done that, why not the rest of the Bible?

It seems rather silly to call these accounts poetic. I could see it now. God speaking to the Amelikites:

Roses are red.
Violets are blue.
I wiped out the Canaanites,
And I’m coming for you.
 
I can assume you have no mind other than believing every thing you heard when you were little must be true
your kind only leads to more sheep
you must be a sheep
i believe that jesus came to enlighten us
how many times did he say “those have ears, listen, those who have eyes, see”
you can’t just live in the past
learn and have the wisdom to use that wisdom
we are supposed to become greater than ourselves
to become greater than you ever thought you could be
that is what i think jesus wanted to teach us
 
40.png
TheHolyGhost:
I am not arguing with God, I have questions and I cannot imagine a Being that is goodness and love itself commanding such brutality.
You are arguing with God. He said He did this, and He did it for a purpose. You seem to have a problem with God executing judgment against sinful creatures, and using other sinful creatures to do it.
I dont think God used Hitler, it was a matter of Hitlers free will and God simply did not intercene. In fact God cannot use people for evil so that good might come of it; the ends dont justify the means! Not to mention God desires that ALL souls are saved, even Hitlers.
Gen 50:19-20 says, “And he answered them: Fear not: can we resist the will of God? You thought evil against me: but God turned it into good, that he might exalt me, as at present you see, and might save many people” (DRA). Sounds to me like God used the evil intention of Joseph’s brothers to bring about some good.
Modern day prophets and their fruits… Well the genuine prophets of the OT were seen as dangerous too, which is why they were persecuted. Even if something a mentally disturbed “modern day prophet” were to say bizarre things today doesnt negate their authenticity on their own maybe? God commanded brutality and that seems very bizarre, by that fruit I would not imagine that to be God, but apparently it was. How then can we test the spirits when they seem similar, either as angels of light or a wrathful God? We can never be sure.
You seem to think that because God executes judgment against sinful creatures He is a wrathful God. Apparently, you are also confused that God could use other sinful creatures to execute His judgments. Read the Scriptures and see how many times He uses men (individuals and nations) for His purposes.

As far as “modern day prophets”, we have the Scriptures to test them by. I realize that’s not enough for a Catholic, but if someone claims to be a prophet from God I have a way to test the claim (it’s the same way Jesus taught us to test “traditions” – see Matt 7).
 
40.png
Contarini:
Not at all. The argument is with human interpretations of what God has done.
What about “And he answered them: Fear not: can we resist the will of God? You thought evil against me: but God turned it into good, that he might exalt me, as at present you see, and might save many people” (Gen 50:19-20 DRA) is difficult to understand?
That is your interpretation. A sound theological interpretation of Scripture, reading all things through the lens of Jesus rather than in a Quran’ic manner, does not lead to this conclusion.
Huh? Quran’ic manner? What are you talking about? And how does your church interpret Gen 50:19-20 (and many other verses that talk about God using men for His purposes)?
For one thing, it’s not at all clear that it happened at all.
OK, so you have doubts about the Scriptures. I don’t. There’s the difference!
It’s not about “right”–it’s about God’s nature and what it means for us to affirm God’s goodness and trust in God.
So you don’t believe God can execute judgment? You seem to have a skewed image of God.
The God who emerges from the fundamentalist reading of Scripture is not God. It would be idolatrous to worship such a God. “Rights” don’t enter into it one way or the other.
I’m not sure what you think the “fundamentalist” image of God is (much less my belief in God), but I believe God is not only a loving Father, but also a fearsome Judge. I believe (and this, based on Scripture) that God loves His people, but executes judgment on those who reject Him, and that He has a purpose in all that happens, good or bad (from our perspective).
 
You are arguing with God. He said He did this, and He did it for a purpose. You seem to have a problem with God executing judgment against sinful creatures, and using other sinful creatures to do it.
Executing judgenent, yes I do have a hard time understanding how God would have His sinful creatures execute judgement when He commands us not to judge others. Only He is the judge and executed judgement.
Gen 50:19-20 says, “And he answered them: Fear not: can we resist the will of God? You thought evil against me: but God turned it into good, that he might exalt me, as at present you see, and might save many people” (DRA). Sounds to me like God used the evil intention of Joseph’s brothers to bring about some good.
Bringing good out of evil, yes God can do that. Creating evil so that good might come from that, not so much.
You seem to think that because God executes judgment against sinful creatures He is a wrathful God. Apparently, you are also confused that God could use other sinful creatures to execute His judgments. Read the Scriptures and see how many times He uses men (individuals and nations) for His purposes.
I can see God using his creatures to inform others, deliver a message, warn the people, preach the Good News, etc., but I cannot imagine God having His creatures kill His other creatures which He loves and wills to be saved, not damned.
As far as “modern day prophets”, we have the Scriptures to test them by. I realize that’s not enough for a Catholic, but if someone claims to be a prophet from God I have a way to test the claim (it’s the same way Jesus taught us to test “traditions” – see Matt 7).
My point is that even the true prophets in the OT would have failed the test. The Jewish people simply saw them as dangerous, crazy people who needed to be imprisoned and shunned - yet they were the real deal. Just because something a “crazy person” says is hard to understand or sounds bizarre enough today, doesn’t automatically make it crazy apparently, as per the OT prophets.

If a mentally disturbed person were to claim that he was instructed by God to execute judgement on all Muslims and non-believers, for God had known their hearts and these people were unwilling to repent and would never, therefore he sent His servant to go out and kill them to stop them from corrupting true believers and for the perserverence of the faith and morality. How would you test this person? They’ve said nothing that contradicts the faith (other than killing off people instead of loving them of course, but this shouldn’t be a problem since this very thing happened for for real, which you consider just, in the OT).
 
40.png
TheHolyGhost:
Executing judgenent, yes I do have a hard time understanding how God would have His sinful creatures execute judgement when He commands us not to judge others. Only He is the judge and executed judgement.
You seem to think that the executioner is also the judge. When a King commanded someone to be put to death (and there are numerous examples in Scripture), did the King execute the condemned person, or did he have someone do it by his authority? In the same way, God judges men and grants to others the authority (in His name) to execute the righteous judgment.
Bringing good out of evil, yes God can do that. Creating evil so that good might come from that, not so much.
Didn’t God know Joseph’s brothers were going to sell him into slavery? Didn’t He know that from before creation? God had a purpose in Joseph being sold into slavery, and His purpose was for good. The intent on his brothers was evil, but God’s purpose was served.
I can see God using his creatures to inform others, deliver a message, warn the people, preach the Good News, etc., but I cannot imagine God having His creatures kill His other creatures which He loves and wills to be saved, not damned.
You don’t seem to understand that God is also a judge to those who reject Him, and is capable of executing judgment. He also chastises His people (just look at the history of Israel as recorded in Judges, 1 & 2 Samuel, and many other OT Scriptures).
My point is that even the true prophets in the OT would have failed the test. The Jewish people simply saw them as dangerous, crazy people who needed to be imprisoned and shunned - yet they were the real deal. Just because something a “crazy person” says is hard to understand or sounds bizarre enough today, doesn’t automatically make it crazy apparently, as per the OT prophets.
Actually, God did give a way to test those who claimed to be prophets in the OT (Deu 13:1-3, Deu 18:20-22)
If a mentally disturbed person were to claim that he was instructed by God to execute judgement on all Muslims and non-believers, for God had known their hearts and these people were unwilling to repent and would never, therefore he sent His servant to go out and kill them to stop them from corrupting true believers and for the perserverence of the faith and morality. How would you test this person? They’ve said nothing that contradicts the faith (other than killing off people instead of loving them of course, but this shouldn’t be a problem since this very thing happened for for real, which you consider just, in the OT).
If someone claims to be a prophet today and says he’s to kill anyone, I can look at NT. The only weapon I find for the Christian Church is the Sword of the Spirit, which is strictly for spiritual warfare, so I can see right away that this is a false prophet. I can only find 2 prophets in the NT that actually kill people, and these are the 2 witnesses found in Revelation.
 
You seem to think that the executioner is also the judge. When a King commanded someone to be put to death (and there are numerous examples in Scripture), did the King execute the condemned person, or did he have someone do it by his authority? In the same way, God judges men and grants to others the authority (in His name) to execute the righteous judgment.
God was both judge and executioner during the Flood, the killing of the first-born Egyptian sons, in Sodom & Gomorroah, etc. It’s something He has always done on His own. It simply confuses me to no end why He would start to need mere men, all of a sudden, to start being His executioners.
Didn’t God know Joseph’s brothers were going to sell him into slavery? Didn’t He know that from before creation? God had a purpose in Joseph being sold into slavery, and His purpose was for good. The intent on his brothers was evil, but God’s purpose was served.
Knowing something and allowing it to happen and then bringing about good is entirely different from making something happen so that good comes of it. My understanding is that the Church teaches the ends never justify the means. If the ends ever did justify the means, then abortion would be OK in cases where the mother’s life was at risk, for example.
You don’t seem to understand that God is also a judge to those who reject Him, and is capable of executing judgment. He also chastises His people (just look at the history of Israel as recorded in Judges, 1 & 2 Samuel, and many other OT Scriptures).
And I’m OK with God doing whatever it is that God does. I just can’t understand Him needing or using men to do something like taking life.
If someone claims to be a prophet today and says he’s to kill anyone, I can look at NT. The only weapon I find for the Christian Church is the Sword of the Spirit, which is strictly for spiritual warfare, so I can see right away that this is a false prophet. I can only find 2 prophets in the NT that actually kill people, and these are the 2 witnesses found in Revelation.
Why only to the NT? The OT is just as true today as it was 2,000 years ago. God’s laws are eternal and God does not change. If we can disregard certain commands from the OT why then can we not disregard the 10 Commandments, for example? Why a preference for one over the other?
 
40.png
TheHolyGhost:
God was both judge and executioner during the Flood, the killing of the first-born Egyptian sons, in Sodom & Gomorroah, etc. It’s something He has always done on His own. It simply confuses me to no end why He would start to need mere men, all of a sudden, to start being His executioners.
It’s been going on for thousands of years! What do you mean by “all of a sudden”?
Knowing something and allowing it to happen and then bringing about good is entirely different from making something happen so that good comes of it. My understanding is that the Church teaches the ends never justify the means. If the ends ever did justify the means, then abortion would be OK in cases where the mother’s life was at risk, for example.
The ends do not justify the means for us. On the other hand, God not only knows what’s going to happen, but has decreed it, and makes sure that the good He intends will be achieved.
And I’m OK with God doing whatever it is that God does. I just can’t understand Him needing or using men to do something like taking life.
Nothing wrong with not understanding (there’s a lot of things I don’t understand). It’s good that you see that God does this. Now I would recommend prayer and continued study of God’s use of men and nations to carry out His will.
Why only to the NT? The OT is just as true today as it was 2,000 years ago. God’s laws are eternal and God does not change. If we can disregard certain commands from the OT why then can we not disregard the 10 Commandments, for example? Why a preference for one over the other?
I can still use the verses in Deuteronomy to test if a prophet is false, but, as a Christian, I am under the New Covenant, not the Old. Of course, I am still obligated to follow God’s Law (which He has engraved on my heart), and there is plenty of NT Scripture to confirm that adultery is wrong (as well as abortion, lying, and many other things).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top