P
ProVobis
Guest
I thought Richard Proulx and Peter Jones did a good job but then the music became obsoleted with a new translation.
Why? I know you mean well, but your link says it all and what the Catholic church believes in with regards to the importance of music and singing; you know it, I know it, those in ministry know it. It’s too bad that the people do not know what the documents of the church they love say. I sometimes think that so many Catholics attend Mass to receive the true body and blood of our Lord and all the “other stuff” is just their to add fluff and waste their time. Instead of getting upset over the looks of the interiors of churches, let’s worry more about what the Catholic church requests of us at Mass. This thread is so disheartening to read such things.Perhaps you want to speak to a Spiritual Director about the specifics of your question.
I know you know that we are in ministry to provide well rehearsed music in order to provide the most solid leadership to those you serve, but I get your point.We, as self-trained musicians in my circle, say after we totally botch a piece of music: “Well, that was good enough for Catholics”.guitar:
![]()
I agree.That Eastern Church is breathtaking! Although I don’t know how fair it is to take the most bland, uninspiring Latin rite parish one can find and compare it to beautiful Eastern rite parish. (But I understand your pain!)
Stephan did a great job on the Mass of Renewal in my opinion too. We have been singing this one a long time now and the people sing it nicely; through-composed it takes the edge off those who think the Gloria is too long when repeating a “refrain.” Previously, we sang the “Mass of Christ the Savior.” I think the people preferred that one and am considering going back to it for awhile. Schutte was smart: he rewrote the Gloria to be sung either through-composed or with a “refrain.” Smart.It is a challenge, but doable. I will say that I found most “Glorias” done rather poorly, but I like Mass of Renewal.
I fail to see the logic in this statement.The departure from well-rehearsed music usually involves a capo.
Not much logic about it; just a fact. We were talking about being well rehearsed, but have that one guitarist place a capo just slightly off center and you got problems. It’s the easy out for some: put the capo on and play the easy chords. I, more than once, gave that look to a guitarist and off came the capo and we were back in tune with the other instruments!I fail to see the logic in this statement.
I see. Thanks to both of you for the clarification. We do good to have just one musician, except for special occasions. I usually just give the actual key for those, and let everyone figure out what’s best. The piano is electronic and has the same issue, as you can change semitones up and down.I, more than once, gave that look to a guitarist and off came the capo and we were back in tune with the other instruments!
It what ways do you think changing to the vernacular backfired?But didn’t that backfire a bit?
Not really. It just didn’t improve the participation and the engagement in the Mass by the laity as much as it had been hoped that it would.PeterT:![]()
But didn’t that backfire a bit?FloridaCatholic:![]()
It was changed to the vernacular so the laity could more fully engage and participate in the Mass and therefore worship God at Mass more fully and completely.Right but the church has to meet the needs of its people though, right? At least somewhat? That’s why the liturgy was changed into the vernacular
What?!?!?!? They have electric lights? And heat? How can you handle all that modernism?!?!?Again, I am going to an Eastern Catholic Liturgy this weekend and probably more often because I need raw Catholicism. Not Mid-Century Catholicism
Eastern
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)