P
PetraG
Guest
This is a very good treatment of the matter: http://www.ccwatershed.org/media/pdfs/14/06/15/16-28-51_0.pdf
It was written while our current Archbishop Sample was still in Michigan; there is good hope that these norms will be introduced more widely in our archdiocese, as well.
After covering the topics of Gregorian chant and polyphony (which are vastly under-used), in this letter he turns to the topic of “secular” music, which is to say music with melodies that could as easily have been used in a popular or folk song rather than in the sacred liturgy:
The Church recognizes an objective difference between sacred music and secular music. Despite the Churchʼs norms, the idea persists among some that the lyrics alone determine whether a song is sacred or secular, while the music is exempt from any liturgical criteria and may be of any style. This erroneous idea, which was alluded to earlier, is not supported by the Churchʼs norms either before or since the Second Vatican Council.
This does not mean that more modern compositions are not to be admitted into the Mass. However, such compositions must meet the essential and objective criteria for what constitutes sacred music. Following are some useful citations illustrating this point.
First, from before the Second Vatican Council:
It cannot be said that modern music and singing should be entirely excluded from Catholic worship. For, if they are not profane nor unbecoming to the sacredness of the place and function, and do not spring from a desire of achieving extraordinary and unusual effects, then our churches must admit them since they can contribute in no small way to the splendor of the sacred ceremonies, can lift the mind to higher things and foster true devotion of soul. (22)
An exhortation from the Council itself:
Let (composers) produce compositions which have the qualities proper to genuine sacred music. (23)
From Blessed John Paul II:
Today, the meaning of the category ʻsacred musicʼ has been broadened to include repertoires that cannot be part of the celebration without violating the spirit and norms of the Liturgy itself. Not all the expressions of music are able to express adequately the mystery grasped in the fullness of the Church’s faith. Consequently, not all forms of music can be considered suitable for liturgical celebrations. (24)
From our Holy Father Pope Benedict XVI:
As far as the liturgy is concerned, we cannot say that one song is as good as another. Generic improvisation or the introduction of musical genres which fail to respect the meaning of the liturgy should be avoided. As an element of the liturgy, song should be well integrated into the overall celebration. Consequently everything–texts, music, execution–ought to correspond to the meaning of the mystery being celebrated, the structure of the rite and the liturgical seasons. 25
It was written while our current Archbishop Sample was still in Michigan; there is good hope that these norms will be introduced more widely in our archdiocese, as well.
After covering the topics of Gregorian chant and polyphony (which are vastly under-used), in this letter he turns to the topic of “secular” music, which is to say music with melodies that could as easily have been used in a popular or folk song rather than in the sacred liturgy:
The Church recognizes an objective difference between sacred music and secular music. Despite the Churchʼs norms, the idea persists among some that the lyrics alone determine whether a song is sacred or secular, while the music is exempt from any liturgical criteria and may be of any style. This erroneous idea, which was alluded to earlier, is not supported by the Churchʼs norms either before or since the Second Vatican Council.
This does not mean that more modern compositions are not to be admitted into the Mass. However, such compositions must meet the essential and objective criteria for what constitutes sacred music. Following are some useful citations illustrating this point.
First, from before the Second Vatican Council:
It cannot be said that modern music and singing should be entirely excluded from Catholic worship. For, if they are not profane nor unbecoming to the sacredness of the place and function, and do not spring from a desire of achieving extraordinary and unusual effects, then our churches must admit them since they can contribute in no small way to the splendor of the sacred ceremonies, can lift the mind to higher things and foster true devotion of soul. (22)
An exhortation from the Council itself:
Let (composers) produce compositions which have the qualities proper to genuine sacred music. (23)
From Blessed John Paul II:
Today, the meaning of the category ʻsacred musicʼ has been broadened to include repertoires that cannot be part of the celebration without violating the spirit and norms of the Liturgy itself. Not all the expressions of music are able to express adequately the mystery grasped in the fullness of the Church’s faith. Consequently, not all forms of music can be considered suitable for liturgical celebrations. (24)
From our Holy Father Pope Benedict XVI:
As far as the liturgy is concerned, we cannot say that one song is as good as another. Generic improvisation or the introduction of musical genres which fail to respect the meaning of the liturgy should be avoided. As an element of the liturgy, song should be well integrated into the overall celebration. Consequently everything–texts, music, execution–ought to correspond to the meaning of the mystery being celebrated, the structure of the rite and the liturgical seasons. 25
Last edited: