M
metpod1911
Guest
My Question is for Fr. Serpa. I am a protestant who is dating a catholic and has always been interested in the Catholic religion but somethings do not sit right with my conscious, for example, Mary (surprise surprise). In a previous question Fr. Serpa answered a question about the incarnation of Jesus with this response:
“Are we to say that Jesus does not deserve a mother who is free from original sin or who remained a perpetual virgin or whose body was protected from the physical corruption of the grave?”
If Jesus deserved a mother who was free from sin and remained a perpetual virgin, why didn’t he also deserve to be born somewhere elegant and raised in a life of luxury? Now I obviously know why he didn’t (prophesies, to set an example, God’s plan ect) but I just don’t see how this is used as evidence for the importance of Mary. Isn’t the selection of Mary by God just as important as the calling of Moses or Daniel or David?
I’m not saying that Mary was not a holy person. I do believe she very much was. But a lot of the tradition we get about Mary comes from an unreliable document (the protoevangalism of James I think). I just don’t see how it can be certified that the history of Mary according to the above mentioned document or the difference in her status are true.
“Are we to say that Jesus does not deserve a mother who is free from original sin or who remained a perpetual virgin or whose body was protected from the physical corruption of the grave?”
If Jesus deserved a mother who was free from sin and remained a perpetual virgin, why didn’t he also deserve to be born somewhere elegant and raised in a life of luxury? Now I obviously know why he didn’t (prophesies, to set an example, God’s plan ect) but I just don’t see how this is used as evidence for the importance of Mary. Isn’t the selection of Mary by God just as important as the calling of Moses or Daniel or David?
I’m not saying that Mary was not a holy person. I do believe she very much was. But a lot of the tradition we get about Mary comes from an unreliable document (the protoevangalism of James I think). I just don’t see how it can be certified that the history of Mary according to the above mentioned document or the difference in her status are true.