Can you be both Catholic and liberal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lil_flower_luv
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
So basically you vote for pro-abortion candidates, correct?
If only he/she would stop voting for these pro abortion candidates who are forcing our women against their will to abort their children and instead vote for pro life Republicans who are saving these children from being aborted then justice would be restored. Thank you for that insightful post.:rolleyes:

Peace,
David
 
Caring for the more unfortunate members of society does not mean favoring abortion, same sex marriage, or what passes for sex education. It does mean exactly what is says. It means having a safety net for the mother abandoned by her violent partner trying to care for her children, a safety net for the elderly couple who through no fault of their own have no one to look out for them when they are sick and have to decide between heat and medicine. The reality of living in these United States is that sometimes bad things happen to good people and there is no one to help them. The Catholic Church can help a little, but the reality is our country is based on rugged individualism which is not very open to being charitable. Someone must step up and who better than the entire population of the US through our taxes. “Providing for the common good” is something our country was founded on. Why not force the country to live up to it?
:clapping:
 
In my opinion the answer is “of course.” Just as it is possible to be both a Catholic and a Conservative. It’s a matter of degree. Feeding the hungry, sheltering the homeless, visiting the imprisoned and tending to the sick are issues generally championed by liberals. Protecting the life of the unborn is generally championed by conservatives.

And of course, these labels change meaning over time. Christ certainly did not wish to maintain the religious and social status quo of his day, which a conservative probably would have. These labels are too often hurled back and forth like verbal bombshells.
 
What in the blue blazes does ANY of this have to do with healthcare, a socialist nationalized healthcare, and the prospect that eventually, the government could and most likely WOULD geographically distribute doctors possibly telling them where they can and cannot live? And even dictate their pay? Keep your eye on the ball there, scooter…LOL!!!
Oops,sorry to burst your bubble clever boy, since we are talking Catholic and liberal… you know, abortion and all other mentioned subjects , I thought I would just toss a little conservative history your way, after all, you did mentioned the former Rep President. Not too many of us are perfect,and concerning our political leaders you can,most certainly, expect to find the bad and the ugly. Want to learn more of the ugly stuff? it’s history.
Peace, Carlan
 
With all of the things that Liberals promote and stand for, I would see it to be very hypocritical for anyone who supports that ideology to call themselves Catholic.
 
As you can see from some of these posts, Republicanism in the United States is becoming a religion, and Catholics are subordinating their faith to their Republican religion. This accounts for your confusion of Catholicism and political conservatism.
You’re a Catholic the moment the water is sprinkled on your head. You cease to be a Catholic when you’re excommunicated. In the meantime, either you are a good catholic or a bad catholic. Bumper-sticker slogans can’t kick you out of the church.
 
In my opinion the answer is “of course.” Just as it is possible to be both a Catholic and a Conservative. It’s a matter of degree. Feeding the hungry, sheltering the homeless, visiting the imprisoned and tending to the sick are issues generally championed by liberals. Protecting the life of the unborn is generally championed by conservatives.

And of course, these labels change meaning over time. Christ certainly did not wish to maintain the religious and social status quo of his day, which a conservative probably would have. These labels are too often hurled back and forth like verbal bombshells.
Where did you get this utter claptrap? Republicans champion all those issues as well, we just don’t champion making the govt in charge of it. Republicans are much more generous and charitable than Democrats.

Using the incompetence of govt to try to fulfill your Christian duties is failing to be Christian.
 
As you can see from some of these posts, Republicanism in the United States is becoming a religion, and Catholics are subordinating their faith to their Republican religion. This accounts for your confusion of Catholicism and political conservatism.
In fact, both political parties have been radicalized due to a number of factors. We have lost sight of the fact that we are all American at the end of the day, and that we must work together. Instead it has been replaced with the idea that the other guy is the enemy, and that there’s only room for one of us in this nation.

If “republicanism” is a religion, “deomcractism” is no less a religion
You’re a Catholic the moment the water is sprinkled on your head. You cease to be a Catholic when you’re excommunicated.
False, excommunication is a disciplinary measure used to encourage the believer to repent of some grave heresy or public sin. It does not make you “not catholic”, you are not disallowed from attending Mass (as per usual, you are encouraged in fact). Rather, you are cut off from the Sacraments, so you can attend Mass, but you can not receive the Eucharist and you can not even receive reconciliation until the excommunication is lifted.

At no point are you ever made “not Catholic”, this is not possible.
In the meantime, either you are a good catholic or a bad catholic. Bumper-sticker slogans can’t kick you out of the church.
No, but one can not knowingly disregard the non-negotiables, this would be abortion, the right deffinition of Marriage in particular, and perhaps some other issues.

Holy Mother Church is all for social justice, and in that light one migth find more sympathy for democrats. But it is the violation of the non-negotiable that, more often than not, breaks the deal. I have seen some genuinely pro-life Democrats, and ones who support proper marriage. The problem is, hardly any of them will ever make it to high elected office, let alone run for the presidency.
 
Answer this, is there anywhere that the Vatican has EVER said that Pro-Life people can’t be Catholic? Is there? NO. So if the Vatican hasn’t made a decision on this then it is not for you to decide or deem who can be Catholic and who can’t. When you become Pope you can’t put that decision the Catholic people.:eek:

Next, do you even know what Communism is? Have you ever looked up the definition? NO. Because if you did you would know that Communism is an economic system where everyone shares the products of their labor equally. That’s it! If you knew anything about world history you would know that the countries of China and Russia were repressive governments who ALSO used the economic model of Communism. If they had chosen capitalism they would have still been as controlling and repressive. Communism has nothing to do with substituting God with the government. Read history! :mad:

You are obviously uneducated, and don’t bother to educate yourself on world history or you would not being saying such nonsense.
Careful about calling others uneducated. You are showing your own ignorance in this thread. First, the Church has taught since the beginning and continues forcefully today to teach that to be Catholic is to be pro-life. Pro-“choice” is contrary to the teaching of the Church. Second, Pope John Paul II issued a teaching that point blank tells us that communism is contrary to the Catholic Faith, and Catholics may not join or be part of communism or the Communist Party.

Before telling others to educate themselves, I would suggest you first take your advice.
 
The separation of “liberal” from parties, such as “democrat”, is of utmost importance here. There are, for example, liberal republicans. Neither the republican or democrat party is completely in line with the faith, though both have something to offer. I, for instance, am very conservative morally, though quite libertarian fiscally; I see my views as most clearly reflecting the social and moral views of the Church, though I am still studying. The moral issues are usually tied up with the fiscal issues, as you support differing groups by how you handle your finances.

My suggestion is that you continue to study the Church’s teachings, preferably through the Catechism. I am, by the way, myself very pro-peace, and see war as a certainly outdated model for conflict resolution. I hope that these scattered notes may help you! Send me a message if you’d like to discuss details. In the life of Christ - John
 
Caring for the more unfortunate members of society does not mean favoring abortion, same sex marriage, or what passes for sex education. It does mean exactly what is says. It means having a safety net for the mother abandoned by her violent partner trying to care for her children, a safety net for the elderly couple who through no fault of their own have no one to look out for them when they are sick and have to decide between heat and medicine. The reality of living in these United States is that sometimes bad things happen to good people and there is no one to help them. The Catholic Church can help a little, but the reality is our country is based on rugged individualism which is not very open to being charitable. Someone must step up and who better than the entire population of the US through our taxes. “Providing for the common good” is something our country was founded on. Why not force the country to live up to it?
We have a valid political dispute in this country between conservatives and liberals on what the best way to care for for the poor and needy is. The Church neither endorses nor opposes Ivins approach to solving these problems. The problem with being Catholic liberal is of the liberal political philosophy includes abortion, homosexual rights, euthanasia, contraception, cloning etc , as part and parcel of helping the poor and needy. . The truth is it makes it impossible for a liberal Catholic, with few exceptions, to vote in any election of national consequences without forsaking their faith in favor of their politics.
 
,
No, but one can not knowingly disregard the non-negotiables, this would be abortion, the right deffinition of Marriage in particular, and perhaps some other issues.

Holy Mother Church is all for social justice, and in that light one migth find more sympathy for democrats. But it is the violation of the non-negotiable that, more often than not, breaks the deal. I have seen some genuinely pro-life Democrats, and ones who support proper marriage. The problem is, hardly any of them will ever make it to high elected office, let alone run for the presidency.
Yes,and that is sad.Murder of the innocent is the only mortal at the top of the campaigning Rep’s list.
Why not push all mortal sinners in their campaigns to gain the peoples vote. The Adultery, the ones who divorce and remarry and the many who treat so many other very serious social justice issues with indifference and inconvenience. Catholics should not be a one issue only voter. The Bishops say so!
Peace, Carlan
 
Yes,and that is sad.Murder of the innocent is the only mortal at the top of the campaigning Rep’s list.
Why not push all mortal sinners in their campaigns to gain the peoples vote. The Adultery, the ones who divorce and remarry and the many who treat so many other very serious social justice issues with indifference and inconvenience. Catholics should not be a one issue only voter. The Bishops say so!
Peace, Carlan
Support of abortion disqualifies a candidate from receiving the vote of the Catholic. . It is wrong to consider abortion to be a single issue as ones support for abortion cannot help but permeate their views. on everything else. Do you really want to have in a position of leadership, a person who believes a woman has to right to pay someone to kill her child

Neither Adultery, divorce, social justice issues, not individually or combined rise to the level of abortion.
 
Support of abortion disqualifies a candidate from receiving the vote of the Catholic. . It is wrong to consider abortion to be a single issue as ones support for abortion cannot help but permeate their views. on everything else. Do you really want to have in a position of leadership, a person who believes a woman has to right to pay someone to kill her child

Neither Adultery, divorce, social justice issues, not individually or combined rise to the level of abortion.
Of course they do not, but they all contribute to the reasons women and men choose to abort.As a pro-life Catholic I do not vote for candidates who are pro-choice and would kill their own in the womb.When our President campaigned for office I wrote and sent four letters to his Illinois and Washington offices asking if he and his wife would abort their child, he did not respond to my letters.I did not vote for him. I will do the same when he begins his next campaign.
I think the men and women who choose to kill their innocent in the womb do not look to anyone for approval they just do it for what ever reason and since it is the civil law , with no punishment attached in the here and now for their heinous act, their conscience is not bothered. They also choose not to consider the punishment of God.

40years is too long to just keep on with the cheip talk during a campaign!
Peace , Carlan
 
Yes,and that is sad.Murder of the innocent is the only mortal at the top of the campaigning Rep’s list.
Why not push all mortal sinners in their campaigns to gain the peoples vote. The Adultery, the ones who divorce and remarry and the many who treat so many other very serious social justice issues with indifference and inconvenience. Catholics should not be a one issue only voter. The Bishops say so!
Peace, Carlan
No Catholics can not be single issue voters, how ever there are a subset of isses I pointed out (cheifly abortion) which no Catholic may support via the vote for a candidate. We simply can not vote for so called “pro-choicers”. There is no choice when something so fundamentally violates the dignaty of God’s creation.
 
It can be quite an interesting exercise to look at politics around the world and see the positions that Catholics and Catholic dominated political parties take.

For example, in Catholic southern Germany and Bavaria the CDU, a Christian Democratic Party and therefore moderate centre right party is usually returned to power with Catholic support. Likewise in Spain Catholics tend to be vote for right wing parties.

In Ireland both main parties are centre right and the only mainstream leftist party is the Irish Labour Party also Sinn Fein which is both neo-marxist and deeply socially conservative. Catholic support being distributed through all the parties.

In Northern Ireland the nationalist mainly catholic community is represented entirely by Parties of the left - the Social Democratic & Labour Party (SDLP) & Sinn Fein. I think this tells us something about the social position of Catholics within that area.

The same is true in Scotland where the Labour Party has traditionally as a democratic socialist party been the natural home of most catholic voters. And even if they have not voted Labour (as in the last election) they have voted overwhelmingly for leftist parties.

I think there is a general argument that can be made that where the Catholic population is the majority and therefore the establishment they tend to vote for right wing parties which offer a sense of continuation. But where Catholics have arrived as an immigrant population or are regarded as having lower social status they will vote for left wing parties which seek to improve their material means.

I think a look around the world and a zoom out from a somewhat myopic and US centred discussion answers the question of the OP in the affirmative.
 
False, excommunication is a disciplinary measure used to encourage the believer to repent of some grave heresy or public sin. It does not make you “not catholic”…
At no point are you ever made “not Catholic”, this is not possible.
I stand corrected… and I adopt your answer as my response to the original post. Yes, you can be a Catholic and a liberal.
No, but one can not knowingly disregard the non-negotiables, this would be abortion, the right deffinition of Marriage in particular, and perhaps some other issues.
Perhaps, but the question is, “Can you be a Catholic and a Liberal?” and the answer is “yes”, of course.
 
I stand corrected… and I adopt your answer as my response to the original post. Yes, you can be a Catholic and a liberal.

Perhaps, but the question is, “Can you be a Catholic and a Liberal?” and the answer is “yes”, of course.
In, fact, you can be liberal, and not belong to the Democratic Party, just as you can be conservative and not be a member of the Republican Party! It’s a little box I check on the voter registration form called, “Independent.” A plague on both their houses!😃
 
It can be quite an interesting exercise to look at politics around the world and see the positions that Catholics and Catholic dominated political parties take.

For example, in Catholic southern Germany and Bavaria the CDU, a Christian Democratic Party and therefore moderate centre right party is usually returned to power with Catholic support. Likewise in Spain Catholics tend to be vote for right wing parties.

In Ireland both main parties are centre right and the only mainstream leftist party is the Irish Labour Party also Sinn Fein which is both neo-marxist and deeply socially conservative. Catholic support being distributed through all the parties.

In Northern Ireland the nationalist mainly catholic community is represented entirely by Parties of the left - the Social Democratic & Labour Party (SDLP) & Sinn Fein. I think this tells us something about the social position of Catholics within that area.

The same is true in Scotland where the Labour Party has traditionally as a democratic socialist party been the natural home of most catholic voters. And even if they have not voted Labour (as in the last election) they have voted overwhelmingly for leftist parties.

I think there is a general argument that can be made that where the Catholic population is the majority and therefore the establishment they tend to vote for right wing parties which offer a sense of continuation. But where Catholics have arrived as an immigrant population or are regarded as having lower social status they will vote for left wing parties which seek to improve their material means.

I think a look around the world and a zoom out from a somewhat myopic and US centred discussion answers the question of the OP in the affirmative.
Interesting post averagejoe. And are you implying that America is not the capital of the world and not necessarily the center of attention for everyone else in the world? Say it ain’t so, Joe!😉
 
“You are very factually challenged. First, you can’t be pro-“choice” and be a faithful Catholic. Period. Abortion is evil and MUST be opposed. You tacitly approve (at best) supporting evil and oppose the Church if you are pro-“choice”.”

Did the the Pope EVER say that you can’t be Pro-Choice and Catholic? NO. You did, but you are not the Pope. Therefore, you can’t make that call. PERIOD.

“Second, the Pope did NOT approve condoms. He only said that a prostitute who used a condom to protect someone MIGHT be seeing the first inklings of God’s presence in their lives and might be slowly turning to God. He did NOT approve condoms. Please do not continue to spread this huge error.”

You are obviously uninformed, "In the book, Benedict said condoms were not “a real or moral solution” to the AIDS epidemic, adding, “that can really lie only in a humanization of sexuality.” But he also said that “there may be a basis in the case of some individuals, as perhaps when a male prostitute uses a condom, where this can be a first step in the direction of a moralization, a first assumption of responsibility.”

If the Pope said a male prostitute can use a condom as an inkling of responsibility. Excuse, me he just said it’s okay for a male hooker to use a condom reduce the risk of AIDS.

“What blessing for divorced people during Mass? Are you talking about the blessing at the end for everyone who is at Mass and has been around since the first century? Or are you talking about the illicit blessings that are given out during Communion in opposition to Church instruction?What blessing for divorced people during Mass? Are you talking about the blessing at the end for everyone who is at Mass and has been around since the first century? Or are you talking about the illicit blessings that are given out during Communion in opposition to Church instruction?”

The one that’s given at Communion to divorced people, that one. Did the Pope forbid that the Blessing too? No. Is that because he is unaware of it? No. If he is against it then why doesn’t he say so? St. Jude’s in San Francisco gives Blessings to divorced people. And St. Jude’s in San Francisco also has an actual relic of St. Jude that is passed to Church members. No one has yet taken away their relic. I would think if their giving of the Blessing was that bad they would not be allowed to hold the St. Jude relic.

The Catholic Church leaves a lot of grey areas and leaves it up to it’s members to understand. Ex: It’s okay for a gay prostitute to use condoms, albeit in the hopes of that it leads to moral life, but why does the Pope specify a gay prostitute? There are more women prostitutes serving straight men? What is distinct about gay hookers that is less prevalent in women prostitutes servicing men? Well, male prostitutes servicing men are more likely to get and spread HIV. So could preventing the spread of HIV be a key component here? And if not what else could be the reason?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top