A
abb
Guest
Simple question, can I be a police officer and have the possibility of killing someone, as we all know it might come down to that, and consider myself Catholic still? Thanks.
Andrew
Andrew
I hope so, otherwise I’m damned because of my profession. Soldiers, law enforcement, etc. CAN still consider themselves Catholic. Why? First, because I know of NO ONE in these professions that WANT to kill another human being. Second, because if the situation requires the use of deadly force on the part of a soldier or law enforcement officer, it is most likely justified. The Church allows for JUST wars. Wars have a lot of killing in them. Therefore, one can be assured that God’s Church (the “Pillar of Truth”) includes members of these professions in their pews and that they need not worry about damnation simply because of their profession.Simple question, can I be a police officer and have the possibility of killing someone, as we all know it might come down to that, and consider myself Catholic still? Thanks.
Andrew
I deleted this thread and have no idea why it came up again, sorry for the inconvience.Didn’t you ask this question before in another thread? :ehh:
In the “foot or hands or whatever…” Are you serious? With all do respect, who among us is so good a shot that they can hit a moving “foot”, “Hands”, or “whatever”? Aim center mass or it will be the police officer who ends being buried. As to a police woman pulling bank robbers out of cars (unarmed)… That is an acception. Do you think she could go out tomorrow and do it again? She was lucky. As for the “bad guys” where you live making American criminals look like wimps… People are the same everywhere. Perhaps where you are they seem more tough, but maybe that is because they know that your cops aren’t carrying.Why do you have to shoot to kill. Shoot them in the foot or hands or whatever…
In this country the police are unarmed, and while back a police woman singlehandedly stopped a bank raider, pulled him out of his car & took his gun from him… And the bad guys in this place make american criminals look like wimps…
Okay, I’m sorry. I wasn’t thinking. You are from a place where guns are illegal, so you probably have no clue how difficult it would be to shoot someone in the hand when he’s waving a knife at you. Incidentally, no one who has any type of training “aims for the heart.” Law enforcement and military for that matter are trained to aim center mass. The torso is the largest part of an individual and thereby the easiest to hit.Yes I’m serious.
Which would explain why law enforcement in your country don’t carry. Sorry, I know that wasn’t charitable but it’s no worse than your comment insinuating that the law enforcement community in the U.S. shouldn’t carry if they are unable to shoot a criminal in the hand.Police have no business being armed if they’re not able to shoot.
You truly have no clue what you are talking about. Law enforcement in the U.S. do not shoot fleeing suspects. If a weapon is drawn, it is in self-defense or the defense of another. I thought that the criminals in your country made our criminals look like “wimps.” If that is the case, how is it you assume that I am speaking of shooting a fleeing suspect? Maybe they always run where you are from but that is certainly not the case here.Its just as easy to aim for legs as it is to aim for the heart - and why would you be shooting at a moving target anyway - is the target running away from you, ie. not being a threat.
a. It’s possible the suspect may be running toward you.Yes I’m serious. Police have no business being armed if they’re not able to shoot. Its just as easy to aim for legs as it is to aim for the heart - and why would you be shooting at a moving target anyway - is the target running away from you, ie. not being a threat.
I agree.a. It’s possible the suspect may be running toward you.
b. If the suspect has a gun and has threatened to kill someone with it, he most certainly is a threat to everyone around him, no matter what direction he is running in.
As Tietjen pointed out, police are taught to aim for center body mass because the torso is the largest part of the body. In most shooting situations the police officer does not have time to slow down, get in a “proper” firing position and take careful aim. It is not like what you see on TV.
The goal is to incapacitate the suspect. Shooting center body mass does not necessarily kill someone. Shooting a suspect in the leg or hand (if you’re lucky enough to make the shot), leaves the suspect quite capable of shooting back at you.
This is indeed one of the most ridiculous threads I’ve ever read.Shooting someone in ’ centre body mass ’ as ye so quaintly put it does not prevent the person from either running or shooting, either. And it probably means multiple shots must be fired before the person falls, allowing for a wonderful amount of damage to be caused to any or all vital organs.
A shot to an elbow or knee prevents a person from either running or shooting back, and the wounds are never life threatening. I think your garden variety shooter will quickly look for cover if he sees someone waving a gun at him, giving you lots of time to take aim. And I have never heard of someone with a gun running towards someone else who is pointing a gun at them - but perhaps it happens.
I’m going to guess that you’ve never shot a handgun.Why do you have to shoot to kill. Shoot them in the foot or hands or whatever…
Ok…heres the solution, if shooting someone with a handgun is a real hit or miss thing - think metaphorical kneecap - if you hit the stomach thats fine, - just an accident. I’ve no problem with police shooting somebody but try to see Christ in the man you’re aiming at, and don’t panic in a difficult spot - we are all dying.
**
Were you ever under duress while aiming that longbow at the bullseye? Was your life being threatened? Was the life of your child, or mother? I have never been in that situation either, and until you or I are, I don’t think we should tell the police officers that it should be easy for them to non-lethally incapacitate a suspect.
Police officers are really only capable of thinking one thing when confronted with a volatile situation in which they might have to shoot a suspect–that one thing should be “incapacitate this person ASAP so that no innocent life is harmed”. Their main priority is not preserving the life of the armed aggressor, but saving the lives of the innocent people he is threatening. This does not mean that we aren’t ‘seeing Christ’ in the criminal, but rather preserving the basic rights of the citizen against those who would violate those rights. We see Christ in him by recognizing that he has a rational soul, the ability to choose his actions, and we hold him accountable for those actions.
**
Wow - you really have no clue. A long bow? Are you serious?
It’s difficult enough to aim a handgun, especially a very high powered weapon, and shoot well, not to mention controlling the massive amount of adrenaline pumped into your body at the same time. I give a ton of credit to anyone who can do it, and our police officers are some of the best shooters there are.
I’ve spent a decent amount of time on the range, I’m a VERY good shot with handguns, and I have an extreme appreciation for those who have to do it in a stressful or chaotic situation. I don’t think I ever could.
Long bow. Gimme a break.
~Liza